VST Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Duke Energy has a net margin of -6.81% compared to Vistra's net margin of 16.72%. Vistra's return on equity of 36.03% beat Duke Energy's return on equity of 9.35%.

Vistra has a consensus price target of $167.08, signalling upside risk potential of 0.46%. On the other hand Duke Energy has an analysts' consensus of $127.08 which suggests that it could grow by 9.22%. Given that Duke Energy has higher upside potential than Vistra, analysts believe Duke Energy is more attractive than Vistra.

Vistra has a beta of 1.225, which suggesting that the stock is 22.537% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Duke Energy has a beta of 0.373, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 62.695%.

Vistra has a quarterly dividend of $0.22 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.53%. Duke Energy offers a yield of 3.59% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.05 per share. Vistra pays 17.98% of its earnings as a dividend. Duke Energy pays out 71.02% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Vistra quarterly revenues are $3.9B, which are smaller than Duke Energy quarterly revenues of $8.2B. Vistra's net income of -$268M is lower than Duke Energy's net income of $1.4B. Notably, Vistra's price-to-earnings ratio is 26.22x while Duke Energy's PE ratio is 19.30x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Vistra is 3.21x versus 2.91x for Duke Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

NRG Energy has a net margin of -6.81% compared to Vistra's net margin of 8.74%. Vistra's return on equity of 36.03% beat NRG Energy's return on equity of 46.41%.

Vistra has a consensus price target of $167.08, signalling upside risk potential of 0.46%. On the other hand NRG Energy has an analysts' consensus of $146.15 which suggests that it could fall by -1.96%. Given that Vistra has higher upside potential than NRG Energy, analysts believe Vistra is more attractive than NRG Energy.

Vistra has a beta of 1.225, which suggesting that the stock is 22.537% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison NRG Energy has a beta of 1.135, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 13.545%.

Vistra has a quarterly dividend of $0.22 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.53%. NRG Energy offers a yield of 1.14% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.44 per share. Vistra pays 17.98% of its earnings as a dividend. NRG Energy pays out 36% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Vistra quarterly revenues are $3.9B, which are smaller than NRG Energy quarterly revenues of $8.6B. Vistra's net income of -$268M is lower than NRG Energy's net income of $750M. Notably, Vistra's price-to-earnings ratio is 26.22x while NRG Energy's PE ratio is 24.20x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Vistra is 3.21x versus 1.06x for NRG Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Oklo has a net margin of -6.81% compared to Vistra's net margin of --. Vistra's return on equity of 36.03% beat Oklo's return on equity of --.

Vistra has a consensus price target of $167.08, signalling upside risk potential of 0.46%. On the other hand Oklo has an analysts' consensus of $55.93 which suggests that it could fall by -17.79%. Given that Vistra has higher upside potential than Oklo, analysts believe Vistra is more attractive than Oklo.

Vistra has a beta of 1.225, which suggesting that the stock is 22.537% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Oklo has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Vistra has a quarterly dividend of $0.22 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.53%. Oklo offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Vistra pays 17.98% of its earnings as a dividend. Oklo pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Vistra's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Vistra quarterly revenues are $3.9B, which are larger than Oklo quarterly revenues of --. Vistra's net income of -$268M is lower than Oklo's net income of -$9.8M. Notably, Vistra's price-to-earnings ratio is 26.22x while Oklo's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Vistra is 3.21x versus -- for Oklo. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Talen Energy has a net margin of -6.81% compared to Vistra's net margin of -21.4%. Vistra's return on equity of 36.03% beat Talen Energy's return on equity of 30.01%.

Vistra has a consensus price target of $167.08, signalling upside risk potential of 0.46%. On the other hand Talen Energy has an analysts' consensus of $280.89 which suggests that it could fall by -4.34%. Given that Vistra has higher upside potential than Talen Energy, analysts believe Vistra is more attractive than Talen Energy.

Vistra has a beta of 1.225, which suggesting that the stock is 22.537% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Talen Energy has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Vistra has a quarterly dividend of $0.22 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.53%. Talen Energy offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Vistra pays 17.98% of its earnings as a dividend. Talen Energy pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Vistra's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Vistra quarterly revenues are $3.9B, which are larger than Talen Energy quarterly revenues of $631M. Vistra's net income of -$268M is lower than Talen Energy's net income of -$135M. Notably, Vistra's price-to-earnings ratio is 26.22x while Talen Energy's PE ratio is 28.54x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Vistra is 3.21x versus 6.96x for Talen Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.