AA Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Cleveland-Cliffs has a net margin of 16.27% compared to Alcoa's net margin of -10.69%. Alcoa's return on equity of 15.83% beat Cleveland-Cliffs's return on equity of -16.75%.

Alcoa has a consensus price target of $36.62, signalling upside risk potential of 26.89%. On the other hand Cleveland-Cliffs has an analysts' consensus of $9.09 which suggests that it could grow by 26.55%. Given that Alcoa has higher upside potential than Cleveland-Cliffs, analysts believe Alcoa is more attractive than Cleveland-Cliffs.

Alcoa has a beta of 2.264, which suggesting that the stock is 126.433% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Cleveland-Cliffs has a beta of 1.849, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 84.859%.

Alcoa has a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.39%. Cleveland-Cliffs offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Alcoa pays 150% of its earnings as a dividend. Cleveland-Cliffs pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Alcoa quarterly revenues are $3.4B, which are smaller than Cleveland-Cliffs quarterly revenues of $4.6B. Alcoa's net income of $548M is higher than Cleveland-Cliffs's net income of -$495M. Notably, Alcoa's price-to-earnings ratio is 8.69x while Cleveland-Cliffs's PE ratio is 175.97x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Alcoa is 0.53x versus 0.19x for Cleveland-Cliffs. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Nucor has a net margin of 16.27% compared to Alcoa's net margin of 1.99%. Alcoa's return on equity of 15.83% beat Nucor's return on equity of 6.22%.

Alcoa has a consensus price target of $36.62, signalling upside risk potential of 26.89%. On the other hand Nucor has an analysts' consensus of $145.37 which suggests that it could grow by 22.73%. Given that Alcoa has higher upside potential than Nucor, analysts believe Alcoa is more attractive than Nucor.

Alcoa has a beta of 2.264, which suggesting that the stock is 126.433% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Nucor has a beta of 1.674, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 67.393%.

Alcoa has a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.39%. Nucor offers a yield of 1.84% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.55 per share. Alcoa pays 150% of its earnings as a dividend. Nucor pays out 25.75% of its earnings as a dividend. Nucor's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Alcoa's is not.

Alcoa quarterly revenues are $3.4B, which are smaller than Nucor quarterly revenues of $7.8B. Alcoa's net income of $548M is higher than Nucor's net income of $156M. Notably, Alcoa's price-to-earnings ratio is 8.69x while Nucor's PE ratio is 21.08x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Alcoa is 0.53x versus 0.92x for Nucor. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Steel Dynamics has a net margin of 16.27% compared to Alcoa's net margin of 4.97%. Alcoa's return on equity of 15.83% beat Steel Dynamics's return on equity of 13%.

Alcoa has a consensus price target of $36.62, signalling upside risk potential of 26.89%. On the other hand Steel Dynamics has an analysts' consensus of $147.22 which suggests that it could grow by 11.66%. Given that Alcoa has higher upside potential than Steel Dynamics, analysts believe Alcoa is more attractive than Steel Dynamics.

Alcoa has a beta of 2.264, which suggesting that the stock is 126.433% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Steel Dynamics has a beta of 1.379, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 37.919%.

Alcoa has a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.39%. Steel Dynamics offers a yield of 1.43% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share. Alcoa pays 150% of its earnings as a dividend. Steel Dynamics pays out 18.39% of its earnings as a dividend. Steel Dynamics's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Alcoa's is not.

Alcoa quarterly revenues are $3.4B, which are smaller than Steel Dynamics quarterly revenues of $4.4B. Alcoa's net income of $548M is higher than Steel Dynamics's net income of $217.2M. Notably, Alcoa's price-to-earnings ratio is 8.69x while Steel Dynamics's PE ratio is 17.42x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Alcoa is 0.53x versus 1.18x for Steel Dynamics. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

United States Steel has a net margin of 16.27% compared to Alcoa's net margin of -3.11%. Alcoa's return on equity of 15.83% beat United States Steel's return on equity of 0.85%.

Alcoa has a consensus price target of $36.62, signalling upside risk potential of 26.89%. On the other hand United States Steel has an analysts' consensus of $48.36 which suggests that it could fall by -9.96%. Given that Alcoa has higher upside potential than United States Steel, analysts believe Alcoa is more attractive than United States Steel.

Alcoa has a beta of 2.264, which suggesting that the stock is 126.433% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison United States Steel has a beta of 1.869, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 86.943%.

Alcoa has a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.39%. United States Steel offers a yield of 0.37% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share. Alcoa pays 150% of its earnings as a dividend. United States Steel pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Alcoa quarterly revenues are $3.4B, which are smaller than United States Steel quarterly revenues of $3.7B. Alcoa's net income of $548M is higher than United States Steel's net income of -$116M. Notably, Alcoa's price-to-earnings ratio is 8.69x while United States Steel's PE ratio is 185.21x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Alcoa is 0.53x versus 0.87x for United States Steel. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.