STLD Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Cleveland-Cliffs has a net margin of 4.97% compared to Steel Dynamics's net margin of -10.69%. Steel Dynamics's return on equity of 13% beat Cleveland-Cliffs's return on equity of -16.75%.

Steel Dynamics has a consensus price target of $146.84, signalling upside risk potential of 14.06%. On the other hand Cleveland-Cliffs has an analysts' consensus of $9.59 which suggests that it could grow by 50.25%. Given that Cleveland-Cliffs has higher upside potential than Steel Dynamics, analysts believe Cleveland-Cliffs is more attractive than Steel Dynamics.

Steel Dynamics has a beta of 1.442, which suggesting that the stock is 44.234% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Cleveland-Cliffs has a beta of 2.035, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 103.452%.

Steel Dynamics has a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.46%. Cleveland-Cliffs offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Steel Dynamics pays 18.39% of its earnings as a dividend. Cleveland-Cliffs pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Steel Dynamics's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Steel Dynamics quarterly revenues are $4.4B, which are smaller than Cleveland-Cliffs quarterly revenues of $4.6B. Steel Dynamics's net income of $217.2M is higher than Cleveland-Cliffs's net income of -$495M. Notably, Steel Dynamics's price-to-earnings ratio is 17.01x while Cleveland-Cliffs's PE ratio is 175.97x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Steel Dynamics is 1.15x versus 0.16x for Cleveland-Cliffs. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Commercial Metals has a net margin of 4.97% compared to Steel Dynamics's net margin of 1.45%. Steel Dynamics's return on equity of 13% beat Commercial Metals's return on equity of 1.76%.

Steel Dynamics has a consensus price target of $146.84, signalling upside risk potential of 14.06%. On the other hand Commercial Metals has an analysts' consensus of $51.95 which suggests that it could grow by 6.28%. Given that Steel Dynamics has higher upside potential than Commercial Metals, analysts believe Steel Dynamics is more attractive than Commercial Metals.

Steel Dynamics has a beta of 1.442, which suggesting that the stock is 44.234% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Commercial Metals has a beta of 1.292, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 29.238%.

Steel Dynamics has a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.46%. Commercial Metals offers a yield of 1.47% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.18 per share. Steel Dynamics pays 18.39% of its earnings as a dividend. Commercial Metals pays out 16.25% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Steel Dynamics quarterly revenues are $4.4B, which are larger than Commercial Metals quarterly revenues of $1.8B. Steel Dynamics's net income of $217.2M is higher than Commercial Metals's net income of $25.5M. Notably, Steel Dynamics's price-to-earnings ratio is 17.01x while Commercial Metals's PE ratio is 81.47x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Steel Dynamics is 1.15x versus 0.73x for Commercial Metals. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Nucor has a net margin of 4.97% compared to Steel Dynamics's net margin of 1.99%. Steel Dynamics's return on equity of 13% beat Nucor's return on equity of 6.22%.

Steel Dynamics has a consensus price target of $146.84, signalling upside risk potential of 14.06%. On the other hand Nucor has an analysts' consensus of $146.74 which suggests that it could grow by 34.15%. Given that Nucor has higher upside potential than Steel Dynamics, analysts believe Nucor is more attractive than Steel Dynamics.

Steel Dynamics has a beta of 1.442, which suggesting that the stock is 44.234% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Nucor has a beta of 1.733, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 73.341%.

Steel Dynamics has a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.46%. Nucor offers a yield of 1.99% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.55 per share. Steel Dynamics pays 18.39% of its earnings as a dividend. Nucor pays out 25.75% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Steel Dynamics quarterly revenues are $4.4B, which are smaller than Nucor quarterly revenues of $7.8B. Steel Dynamics's net income of $217.2M is higher than Nucor's net income of $156M. Notably, Steel Dynamics's price-to-earnings ratio is 17.01x while Nucor's PE ratio is 19.46x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Steel Dynamics is 1.15x versus 0.85x for Nucor. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Reliance has a net margin of 4.97% compared to Steel Dynamics's net margin of 5.73%. Steel Dynamics's return on equity of 13% beat Reliance's return on equity of 10.35%.

Steel Dynamics has a consensus price target of $146.84, signalling upside risk potential of 14.06%. On the other hand Reliance has an analysts' consensus of $327.03 which suggests that it could grow by 8.92%. Given that Steel Dynamics has higher upside potential than Reliance, analysts believe Steel Dynamics is more attractive than Reliance.

Steel Dynamics has a beta of 1.442, which suggesting that the stock is 44.234% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Reliance has a beta of 0.913, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 8.721%.

Steel Dynamics has a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.46%. Reliance offers a yield of 1.53% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.20 per share. Steel Dynamics pays 18.39% of its earnings as a dividend. Reliance pays out 28.53% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Steel Dynamics quarterly revenues are $4.4B, which are larger than Reliance quarterly revenues of $3.5B. Steel Dynamics's net income of $217.2M is higher than Reliance's net income of $199.7M. Notably, Steel Dynamics's price-to-earnings ratio is 17.01x while Reliance's PE ratio is 21.52x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Steel Dynamics is 1.15x versus 1.21x for Reliance. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.