CLF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Nucor has a net margin of -10.69% compared to Cleveland-Cliffs's net margin of 1.99%. Cleveland-Cliffs's return on equity of -16.75% beat Nucor's return on equity of 6.22%.

Cleveland-Cliffs has a consensus price target of $8.79, signalling upside risk potential of 18.03%. On the other hand Nucor has an analysts' consensus of $146.60 which suggests that it could grow by 12.24%. Given that Cleveland-Cliffs has higher upside potential than Nucor, analysts believe Cleveland-Cliffs is more attractive than Nucor.

Cleveland-Cliffs has a beta of 1.849, which suggesting that the stock is 84.859% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Nucor has a beta of 1.674, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 67.393%.

Cleveland-Cliffs has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Nucor offers a yield of 1.67% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.55 per share. Cleveland-Cliffs pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Nucor pays out 25.75% of its earnings as a dividend. Nucor's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Cleveland-Cliffs quarterly revenues are $4.6B, which are smaller than Nucor quarterly revenues of $7.8B. Cleveland-Cliffs's net income of -$495M is lower than Nucor's net income of $156M. Notably, Cleveland-Cliffs's price-to-earnings ratio is 175.97x while Nucor's PE ratio is 23.24x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cleveland-Cliffs is 0.19x versus 1.01x for Nucor. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Steel Dynamics has a net margin of -10.69% compared to Cleveland-Cliffs's net margin of 4.97%. Cleveland-Cliffs's return on equity of -16.75% beat Steel Dynamics's return on equity of 13%.

Cleveland-Cliffs has a consensus price target of $8.79, signalling upside risk potential of 18.03%. On the other hand Steel Dynamics has an analysts' consensus of $147.37 which suggests that it could grow by 12.07%. Given that Cleveland-Cliffs has higher upside potential than Steel Dynamics, analysts believe Cleveland-Cliffs is more attractive than Steel Dynamics.

Cleveland-Cliffs has a beta of 1.849, which suggesting that the stock is 84.859% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Steel Dynamics has a beta of 1.379, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 37.919%.

Cleveland-Cliffs has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Steel Dynamics offers a yield of 1.43% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share. Cleveland-Cliffs pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Steel Dynamics pays out 18.39% of its earnings as a dividend. Steel Dynamics's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Cleveland-Cliffs quarterly revenues are $4.6B, which are larger than Steel Dynamics quarterly revenues of $4.4B. Cleveland-Cliffs's net income of -$495M is lower than Steel Dynamics's net income of $217.2M. Notably, Cleveland-Cliffs's price-to-earnings ratio is 175.97x while Steel Dynamics's PE ratio is 17.37x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cleveland-Cliffs is 0.19x versus 1.18x for Steel Dynamics. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Worthington Steel has a net margin of -10.69% compared to Cleveland-Cliffs's net margin of 2.01%. Cleveland-Cliffs's return on equity of -16.75% beat Worthington Steel's return on equity of 9.63%.

Cleveland-Cliffs has a consensus price target of $8.79, signalling upside risk potential of 18.03%. On the other hand Worthington Steel has an analysts' consensus of $32.00 which suggests that it could grow by 21.86%. Given that Worthington Steel has higher upside potential than Cleveland-Cliffs, analysts believe Worthington Steel is more attractive than Cleveland-Cliffs.

Cleveland-Cliffs has a beta of 1.849, which suggesting that the stock is 84.859% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Worthington Steel has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Cleveland-Cliffs has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Worthington Steel offers a yield of 2.44% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.16 per share. Cleveland-Cliffs pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Worthington Steel pays out 102.07% of its earnings as a dividend.

Cleveland-Cliffs quarterly revenues are $4.6B, which are larger than Worthington Steel quarterly revenues of $687.4M. Cleveland-Cliffs's net income of -$495M is lower than Worthington Steel's net income of $13.8M. Notably, Cleveland-Cliffs's price-to-earnings ratio is 175.97x while Worthington Steel's PE ratio is 12.27x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cleveland-Cliffs is 0.19x versus 0.42x for Worthington Steel. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.