SAABY Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Atlas Copco AB has a net margin of 8.03% compared to Saab AB's net margin of 15.44%. Saab AB's return on equity of 12.84% beat Atlas Copco AB's return on equity of 27.18%.

Saab AB has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Atlas Copco AB has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Saab AB has higher upside potential than Atlas Copco AB, analysts believe Saab AB is more attractive than Atlas Copco AB.

Saab AB has a beta of 0.124, which suggesting that the stock is 87.599% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Atlas Copco AB has a beta of 1.355, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 35.541%.

Saab AB has a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.36%. Atlas Copco AB offers a yield of 1.73% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.16 per share. Saab AB pays 20.52% of its earnings as a dividend. Atlas Copco AB pays out 45.82% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Saab AB quarterly revenues are $1.5B, which are smaller than Atlas Copco AB quarterly revenues of $4B. Saab AB's net income of $118.9M is lower than Atlas Copco AB's net income of $618.6M. Notably, Saab AB's price-to-earnings ratio is 61.18x while Atlas Copco AB's PE ratio is 29.48x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Saab AB is 4.37x versus 4.88x for Atlas Copco AB. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Husqvarna AB has a net margin of 8.03% compared to Saab AB's net margin of 6.6%. Saab AB's return on equity of 12.84% beat Husqvarna AB's return on equity of 3.85%.

Saab AB has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Husqvarna AB has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Saab AB has higher upside potential than Husqvarna AB, analysts believe Saab AB is more attractive than Husqvarna AB.

Saab AB has a beta of 0.124, which suggesting that the stock is 87.599% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Husqvarna AB has a beta of 1.766, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 76.629%.

Saab AB has a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.36%. Husqvarna AB offers a yield of 4.28% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share. Saab AB pays 20.52% of its earnings as a dividend. Husqvarna AB pays out 129.43% of its earnings as a dividend. Saab AB's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Husqvarna AB's is not.

Saab AB quarterly revenues are $1.5B, which are larger than Husqvarna AB quarterly revenues of $1.4B. Saab AB's net income of $118.9M is higher than Husqvarna AB's net income of $90.9M. Notably, Saab AB's price-to-earnings ratio is 61.18x while Husqvarna AB's PE ratio is 35.20x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Saab AB is 4.37x versus 0.71x for Husqvarna AB. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Sandvik AB has a net margin of 8.03% compared to Saab AB's net margin of 12.75%. Saab AB's return on equity of 12.84% beat Sandvik AB's return on equity of 15.69%.

Saab AB has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Sandvik AB has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Saab AB has higher upside potential than Sandvik AB, analysts believe Saab AB is more attractive than Sandvik AB.

Saab AB has a beta of 0.124, which suggesting that the stock is 87.599% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Sandvik AB has a beta of 1.484, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 48.437%.

Saab AB has a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.36%. Sandvik AB offers a yield of 2.54% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.60 per share. Saab AB pays 20.52% of its earnings as a dividend. Sandvik AB pays out 56.2% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Saab AB quarterly revenues are $1.5B, which are smaller than Sandvik AB quarterly revenues of $2.7B. Saab AB's net income of $118.9M is lower than Sandvik AB's net income of $350.3M. Notably, Saab AB's price-to-earnings ratio is 61.18x while Sandvik AB's PE ratio is 21.35x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Saab AB is 4.37x versus 2.55x for Sandvik AB. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

SKF AB has a net margin of 8.03% compared to Saab AB's net margin of 7.49%. Saab AB's return on equity of 12.84% beat SKF AB's return on equity of 10.6%.

Saab AB has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand SKF AB has an analysts' consensus of $22.40 which suggests that it could fall by -2.82%. Given that SKF AB has higher upside potential than Saab AB, analysts believe SKF AB is more attractive than Saab AB.

Saab AB has a beta of 0.124, which suggesting that the stock is 87.599% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison SKF AB has a beta of 1.150, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 15.014%.

Saab AB has a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.36%. SKF AB offers a yield of 3.36% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.77 per share. Saab AB pays 20.52% of its earnings as a dividend. SKF AB pays out 59.19% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Saab AB quarterly revenues are $1.5B, which are smaller than SKF AB quarterly revenues of $2.2B. Saab AB's net income of $118.9M is lower than SKF AB's net income of $168.4M. Notably, Saab AB's price-to-earnings ratio is 61.18x while SKF AB's PE ratio is 17.46x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Saab AB is 4.37x versus 1.14x for SKF AB. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.