SKFRY Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Atlas Copco AB has a net margin of 7.49% compared to SKF AB's net margin of 15.44%. SKF AB's return on equity of 10.6% beat Atlas Copco AB's return on equity of 27.18%.

SKF AB has a consensus price target of $22.40, signalling upside risk potential of 3.56%. On the other hand Atlas Copco AB has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that SKF AB has higher upside potential than Atlas Copco AB, analysts believe SKF AB is more attractive than Atlas Copco AB.

SKF AB has a beta of 1.157, which suggesting that the stock is 15.656% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Atlas Copco AB has a beta of 1.377, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 37.667%.

SKF AB has a quarterly dividend of $0.77 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.58%. Atlas Copco AB offers a yield of 1.86% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.16 per share. SKF AB pays 59.19% of its earnings as a dividend. Atlas Copco AB pays out 45.82% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

SKF AB quarterly revenues are $2.2B, which are smaller than Atlas Copco AB quarterly revenues of $4B. SKF AB's net income of $168.4M is lower than Atlas Copco AB's net income of $618.6M. Notably, SKF AB's price-to-earnings ratio is 16.39x while Atlas Copco AB's PE ratio is 27.49x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for SKF AB is 1.07x versus 4.55x for Atlas Copco AB. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Husqvarna AB has a net margin of 7.49% compared to SKF AB's net margin of 6.6%. SKF AB's return on equity of 10.6% beat Husqvarna AB's return on equity of 3.85%.

SKF AB has a consensus price target of $22.40, signalling upside risk potential of 3.56%. On the other hand Husqvarna AB has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that SKF AB has higher upside potential than Husqvarna AB, analysts believe SKF AB is more attractive than Husqvarna AB.

SKF AB has a beta of 1.157, which suggesting that the stock is 15.656% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Husqvarna AB has a beta of 1.777, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 77.739%.

SKF AB has a quarterly dividend of $0.77 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.58%. Husqvarna AB offers a yield of 4.76% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share. SKF AB pays 59.19% of its earnings as a dividend. Husqvarna AB pays out 129.43% of its earnings as a dividend. SKF AB's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Husqvarna AB's is not.

SKF AB quarterly revenues are $2.2B, which are larger than Husqvarna AB quarterly revenues of $1.4B. SKF AB's net income of $168.4M is higher than Husqvarna AB's net income of $90.9M. Notably, SKF AB's price-to-earnings ratio is 16.39x while Husqvarna AB's PE ratio is 31.63x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for SKF AB is 1.07x versus 0.64x for Husqvarna AB. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Precise Biometrics AB has a net margin of 7.49% compared to SKF AB's net margin of --. SKF AB's return on equity of 10.6% beat Precise Biometrics AB's return on equity of --.

SKF AB has a consensus price target of $22.40, signalling upside risk potential of 3.56%. On the other hand Precise Biometrics AB has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that SKF AB has higher upside potential than Precise Biometrics AB, analysts believe SKF AB is more attractive than Precise Biometrics AB.

SKF AB has a beta of 1.157, which suggesting that the stock is 15.656% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Precise Biometrics AB has a beta of -0.188, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 118.757%.

SKF AB has a quarterly dividend of $0.77 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.58%. Precise Biometrics AB offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. SKF AB pays 59.19% of its earnings as a dividend. Precise Biometrics AB pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. SKF AB's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

SKF AB quarterly revenues are $2.2B, which are larger than Precise Biometrics AB quarterly revenues of --. SKF AB's net income of $168.4M is higher than Precise Biometrics AB's net income of --. Notably, SKF AB's price-to-earnings ratio is 16.39x while Precise Biometrics AB's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for SKF AB is 1.07x versus 2.25x for Precise Biometrics AB. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Sandvik AB has a net margin of 7.49% compared to SKF AB's net margin of 12.75%. SKF AB's return on equity of 10.6% beat Sandvik AB's return on equity of 15.69%.

SKF AB has a consensus price target of $22.40, signalling upside risk potential of 3.56%. On the other hand Sandvik AB has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that SKF AB has higher upside potential than Sandvik AB, analysts believe SKF AB is more attractive than Sandvik AB.

SKF AB has a beta of 1.157, which suggesting that the stock is 15.656% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Sandvik AB has a beta of 1.496, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 49.626%.

SKF AB has a quarterly dividend of $0.77 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.58%. Sandvik AB offers a yield of 2.76% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.60 per share. SKF AB pays 59.19% of its earnings as a dividend. Sandvik AB pays out 56.2% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

SKF AB quarterly revenues are $2.2B, which are smaller than Sandvik AB quarterly revenues of $2.7B. SKF AB's net income of $168.4M is lower than Sandvik AB's net income of $350.3M. Notably, SKF AB's price-to-earnings ratio is 16.39x while Sandvik AB's PE ratio is 19.64x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for SKF AB is 1.07x versus 2.35x for Sandvik AB. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.