MSBHF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Kyocera has a net margin of 4.56% compared to Mitsubishi's net margin of -3.6%. Mitsubishi's return on equity of 9.29% beat Kyocera's return on equity of 0.75%.

Mitsubishi has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Kyocera has an analysts' consensus of $11.57 which suggests that it could fall by -5.19%. Given that Kyocera has higher upside potential than Mitsubishi, analysts believe Kyocera is more attractive than Mitsubishi.

Mitsubishi has a beta of 0.657, which suggesting that the stock is 34.272% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kyocera has a beta of 0.320, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 67.954%.

Mitsubishi has a quarterly dividend of $0.33 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.3%. Kyocera offers a yield of 2.63% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share. Mitsubishi pays 36% of its earnings as a dividend. Kyocera pays out 304.23% of its earnings as a dividend. Mitsubishi's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Kyocera's is not.

Mitsubishi quarterly revenues are $30.1B, which are larger than Kyocera quarterly revenues of $3.2B. Mitsubishi's net income of $1.4B is higher than Kyocera's net income of -$116.4M. Notably, Mitsubishi's price-to-earnings ratio is 13.03x while Kyocera's PE ratio is 104.62x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Mitsubishi is 0.67x versus 1.28x for Kyocera. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

LogProstyle has a net margin of 4.56% compared to Mitsubishi's net margin of --. Mitsubishi's return on equity of 9.29% beat LogProstyle's return on equity of --.

Mitsubishi has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand LogProstyle has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Mitsubishi has higher upside potential than LogProstyle, analysts believe Mitsubishi is more attractive than LogProstyle.

Mitsubishi has a beta of 0.657, which suggesting that the stock is 34.272% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison LogProstyle has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Mitsubishi has a quarterly dividend of $0.33 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.3%. LogProstyle offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Mitsubishi pays 36% of its earnings as a dividend. LogProstyle pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Mitsubishi's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Mitsubishi quarterly revenues are $30.1B, which are larger than LogProstyle quarterly revenues of --. Mitsubishi's net income of $1.4B is higher than LogProstyle's net income of --. Notably, Mitsubishi's price-to-earnings ratio is 13.03x while LogProstyle's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Mitsubishi is 0.67x versus -- for LogProstyle. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Marubeni has a net margin of 4.56% compared to Mitsubishi's net margin of 10.23%. Mitsubishi's return on equity of 9.29% beat Marubeni's return on equity of 13.65%.

Mitsubishi has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Marubeni has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Mitsubishi has higher upside potential than Marubeni, analysts believe Mitsubishi is more attractive than Marubeni.

Mitsubishi has a beta of 0.657, which suggesting that the stock is 34.272% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Marubeni has a beta of 0.772, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 22.845%.

Mitsubishi has a quarterly dividend of $0.33 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.3%. Marubeni offers a yield of 2.88% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $3.00 per share. Mitsubishi pays 36% of its earnings as a dividend. Marubeni pays out 29.32% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Mitsubishi quarterly revenues are $30.1B, which are larger than Marubeni quarterly revenues of $12B. Mitsubishi's net income of $1.4B is higher than Marubeni's net income of $1.2B. Notably, Mitsubishi's price-to-earnings ratio is 13.03x while Marubeni's PE ratio is 9.99x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Mitsubishi is 0.67x versus 0.64x for Marubeni. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Sumitomo has a net margin of 4.56% compared to Mitsubishi's net margin of 9.02%. Mitsubishi's return on equity of 9.29% beat Sumitomo's return on equity of 11.68%.

Mitsubishi has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Sumitomo has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Mitsubishi has higher upside potential than Sumitomo, analysts believe Mitsubishi is more attractive than Sumitomo.

Mitsubishi has a beta of 0.657, which suggesting that the stock is 34.272% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Sumitomo has a beta of 0.638, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 36.174%.

Mitsubishi has a quarterly dividend of $0.33 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.3%. Sumitomo offers a yield of 3.23% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.43 per share. Mitsubishi pays 36% of its earnings as a dividend. Sumitomo pays out 27.59% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Mitsubishi quarterly revenues are $30.1B, which are larger than Sumitomo quarterly revenues of $11.8B. Mitsubishi's net income of $1.4B is higher than Sumitomo's net income of $1.1B. Notably, Mitsubishi's price-to-earnings ratio is 13.03x while Sumitomo's PE ratio is 8.30x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Mitsubishi is 0.67x versus 0.64x for Sumitomo. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.