MARUY Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Kubota has a net margin of 10.23% compared to Marubeni's net margin of 5.8%. Marubeni's return on equity of 13.47% beat Kubota's return on equity of 9.61%.

Marubeni has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Kubota has an analysts' consensus of $62.80 which suggests that it could grow by 10.87%. Given that Kubota has higher upside potential than Marubeni, analysts believe Kubota is more attractive than Marubeni.

Marubeni has a beta of 0.783, which suggesting that the stock is 21.74% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kubota has a beta of 1.009, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 0.919%.

Marubeni has a quarterly dividend of $3.49 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.19%. Kubota offers a yield of 2.98% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.83 per share. Marubeni pays 29.32% of its earnings as a dividend. Kubota pays out 24.99% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Marubeni quarterly revenues are $12B, which are larger than Kubota quarterly revenues of $4.7B. Marubeni's net income of $1.2B is higher than Kubota's net income of $271.1M. Notably, Marubeni's price-to-earnings ratio is 10.12x while Kubota's PE ratio is 8.08x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Marubeni is 0.65x versus 0.65x for Kubota. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Kyocera has a net margin of 10.23% compared to Marubeni's net margin of -3.6%. Marubeni's return on equity of 13.47% beat Kyocera's return on equity of 0.75%.

Marubeni has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Kyocera has an analysts' consensus of $12.32 which suggests that it could grow by 4.52%. Given that Kyocera has higher upside potential than Marubeni, analysts believe Kyocera is more attractive than Marubeni.

Marubeni has a beta of 0.783, which suggesting that the stock is 21.74% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kyocera has a beta of 0.307, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 69.335%.

Marubeni has a quarterly dividend of $3.49 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.19%. Kyocera offers a yield of 2.87% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share. Marubeni pays 29.32% of its earnings as a dividend. Kyocera pays out 304.23% of its earnings as a dividend. Marubeni's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Kyocera's is not.

Marubeni quarterly revenues are $12B, which are larger than Kyocera quarterly revenues of $3.2B. Marubeni's net income of $1.2B is higher than Kyocera's net income of -$116.4M. Notably, Marubeni's price-to-earnings ratio is 10.12x while Kyocera's PE ratio is 101.03x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Marubeni is 0.65x versus 1.24x for Kyocera. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

LogProstyle has a net margin of 10.23% compared to Marubeni's net margin of --. Marubeni's return on equity of 13.47% beat LogProstyle's return on equity of --.

Marubeni has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand LogProstyle has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Marubeni has higher upside potential than LogProstyle, analysts believe Marubeni is more attractive than LogProstyle.

Marubeni has a beta of 0.783, which suggesting that the stock is 21.74% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison LogProstyle has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Marubeni has a quarterly dividend of $3.49 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.19%. LogProstyle offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Marubeni pays 29.32% of its earnings as a dividend. LogProstyle pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Marubeni's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Marubeni quarterly revenues are $12B, which are larger than LogProstyle quarterly revenues of --. Marubeni's net income of $1.2B is higher than LogProstyle's net income of --. Notably, Marubeni's price-to-earnings ratio is 10.12x while LogProstyle's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Marubeni is 0.65x versus -- for LogProstyle. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.