KUBTY Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Japan Food Tech Holdings has a net margin of 5.8% compared to Kubota's net margin of -1471.96%. Kubota's return on equity of 9.61% beat Japan Food Tech Holdings's return on equity of -241.02%.

Kubota has a consensus price target of $62.80, signalling upside risk potential of 12.8%. On the other hand Japan Food Tech Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Kubota has higher upside potential than Japan Food Tech Holdings, analysts believe Kubota is more attractive than Japan Food Tech Holdings.

Kubota has a beta of 1.030, which suggesting that the stock is 3.027% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Japan Food Tech Holdings has a beta of 45.515, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 4451.471%.

Kubota has a quarterly dividend of $0.83 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.03%. Japan Food Tech Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Kubota pays 24.99% of its earnings as a dividend. Japan Food Tech Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Kubota's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Kubota quarterly revenues are $4.7B, which are larger than Japan Food Tech Holdings quarterly revenues of $5.5K. Kubota's net income of $271.1M is higher than Japan Food Tech Holdings's net income of -$81.3K. Notably, Kubota's price-to-earnings ratio is 7.94x while Japan Food Tech Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Kubota is 0.64x versus 0.81x for Japan Food Tech Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Kyocera has a net margin of 5.8% compared to Kubota's net margin of -3.6%. Kubota's return on equity of 9.61% beat Kyocera's return on equity of 0.75%.

Kubota has a consensus price target of $62.80, signalling upside risk potential of 12.8%. On the other hand Kyocera has an analysts' consensus of $12.32 which suggests that it could grow by 3.78%. Given that Kubota has higher upside potential than Kyocera, analysts believe Kubota is more attractive than Kyocera.

Kubota has a beta of 1.030, which suggesting that the stock is 3.027% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kyocera has a beta of 0.326, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 67.401%.

Kubota has a quarterly dividend of $0.83 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.03%. Kyocera offers a yield of 2.71% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share. Kubota pays 24.99% of its earnings as a dividend. Kyocera pays out 304.23% of its earnings as a dividend. Kubota's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Kyocera's is not.

Kubota quarterly revenues are $4.7B, which are larger than Kyocera quarterly revenues of $3.2B. Kubota's net income of $271.1M is higher than Kyocera's net income of -$116.4M. Notably, Kubota's price-to-earnings ratio is 7.94x while Kyocera's PE ratio is 101.75x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Kubota is 0.64x versus 1.25x for Kyocera. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

LogProstyle has a net margin of 5.8% compared to Kubota's net margin of --. Kubota's return on equity of 9.61% beat LogProstyle's return on equity of --.

Kubota has a consensus price target of $62.80, signalling upside risk potential of 12.8%. On the other hand LogProstyle has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Kubota has higher upside potential than LogProstyle, analysts believe Kubota is more attractive than LogProstyle.

Kubota has a beta of 1.030, which suggesting that the stock is 3.027% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison LogProstyle has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Kubota has a quarterly dividend of $0.83 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.03%. LogProstyle offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Kubota pays 24.99% of its earnings as a dividend. LogProstyle pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Kubota's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Kubota quarterly revenues are $4.7B, which are larger than LogProstyle quarterly revenues of --. Kubota's net income of $271.1M is higher than LogProstyle's net income of --. Notably, Kubota's price-to-earnings ratio is 7.94x while LogProstyle's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Kubota is 0.64x versus -- for LogProstyle. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

SECOM has a net margin of 5.8% compared to Kubota's net margin of 9.53%. Kubota's return on equity of 9.61% beat SECOM's return on equity of 7.58%.

Kubota has a consensus price target of $62.80, signalling upside risk potential of 12.8%. On the other hand SECOM has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Kubota has higher upside potential than SECOM, analysts believe Kubota is more attractive than SECOM.

Kubota has a beta of 1.030, which suggesting that the stock is 3.027% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison SECOM has a beta of 0.471, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 52.9%.

Kubota has a quarterly dividend of $0.83 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.03%. SECOM offers a yield of 1.71% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share. Kubota pays 24.99% of its earnings as a dividend. SECOM pays out 36.72% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Kubota quarterly revenues are $4.7B, which are larger than SECOM quarterly revenues of $2B. Kubota's net income of $271.1M is higher than SECOM's net income of $190.3M. Notably, Kubota's price-to-earnings ratio is 7.94x while SECOM's PE ratio is 27.18x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Kubota is 0.64x versus 2.81x for SECOM. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.