ITOCF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Kyocera has a net margin of 6.35% compared to ITOCHU's net margin of -3.6%. ITOCHU's return on equity of 14.08% beat Kyocera's return on equity of 0.75%.

ITOCHU has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Kyocera has an analysts' consensus of $11.57 which suggests that it could fall by -5.76%. Given that Kyocera has higher upside potential than ITOCHU, analysts believe Kyocera is more attractive than ITOCHU.

ITOCHU has a beta of 0.853, which suggesting that the stock is 14.666% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kyocera has a beta of 0.320, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 67.954%.

ITOCHU has a quarterly dividend of $0.66 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.6%. Kyocera offers a yield of 2.62% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share. ITOCHU pays 29.38% of its earnings as a dividend. Kyocera pays out 304.23% of its earnings as a dividend. ITOCHU's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Kyocera's is not.

ITOCHU quarterly revenues are $24.6B, which are larger than Kyocera quarterly revenues of $3.2B. ITOCHU's net income of $1.6B is higher than Kyocera's net income of -$116.4M. Notably, ITOCHU's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.70x while Kyocera's PE ratio is 105.25x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ITOCHU is 0.76x versus 1.29x for Kyocera. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

LogProstyle has a net margin of 6.35% compared to ITOCHU's net margin of --. ITOCHU's return on equity of 14.08% beat LogProstyle's return on equity of --.

ITOCHU has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand LogProstyle has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that ITOCHU has higher upside potential than LogProstyle, analysts believe ITOCHU is more attractive than LogProstyle.

ITOCHU has a beta of 0.853, which suggesting that the stock is 14.666% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison LogProstyle has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

ITOCHU has a quarterly dividend of $0.66 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.6%. LogProstyle offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. ITOCHU pays 29.38% of its earnings as a dividend. LogProstyle pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. ITOCHU's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

ITOCHU quarterly revenues are $24.6B, which are larger than LogProstyle quarterly revenues of --. ITOCHU's net income of $1.6B is higher than LogProstyle's net income of --. Notably, ITOCHU's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.70x while LogProstyle's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ITOCHU is 0.76x versus -- for LogProstyle. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Marubeni has a net margin of 6.35% compared to ITOCHU's net margin of 10.23%. ITOCHU's return on equity of 14.08% beat Marubeni's return on equity of 13.65%.

ITOCHU has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Marubeni has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that ITOCHU has higher upside potential than Marubeni, analysts believe ITOCHU is more attractive than Marubeni.

ITOCHU has a beta of 0.853, which suggesting that the stock is 14.666% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Marubeni has a beta of 0.772, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 22.845%.

ITOCHU has a quarterly dividend of $0.66 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.6%. Marubeni offers a yield of 3% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $3.00 per share. ITOCHU pays 29.38% of its earnings as a dividend. Marubeni pays out 29.32% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

ITOCHU quarterly revenues are $24.6B, which are larger than Marubeni quarterly revenues of $12B. ITOCHU's net income of $1.6B is higher than Marubeni's net income of $1.2B. Notably, ITOCHU's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.70x while Marubeni's PE ratio is 9.58x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ITOCHU is 0.76x versus 0.62x for Marubeni. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Sumitomo has a net margin of 6.35% compared to ITOCHU's net margin of 9.02%. ITOCHU's return on equity of 14.08% beat Sumitomo's return on equity of 11.68%.

ITOCHU has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Sumitomo has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that ITOCHU has higher upside potential than Sumitomo, analysts believe ITOCHU is more attractive than Sumitomo.

ITOCHU has a beta of 0.853, which suggesting that the stock is 14.666% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Sumitomo has a beta of 0.638, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 36.174%.

ITOCHU has a quarterly dividend of $0.66 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.6%. Sumitomo offers a yield of 3.22% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.43 per share. ITOCHU pays 29.38% of its earnings as a dividend. Sumitomo pays out 27.59% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

ITOCHU quarterly revenues are $24.6B, which are larger than Sumitomo quarterly revenues of $11.8B. ITOCHU's net income of $1.6B is higher than Sumitomo's net income of $1.1B. Notably, ITOCHU's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.70x while Sumitomo's PE ratio is 8.33x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ITOCHU is 0.76x versus 0.64x for Sumitomo. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.