HTHIF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Kubota has a net margin of 5.77% compared to Hitachi's net margin of 5.8%. Hitachi's return on equity of 10.37% beat Kubota's return on equity of 9.61%.

Hitachi has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Kubota has an analysts' consensus of $62.80 which suggests that it could grow by 13.54%. Given that Kubota has higher upside potential than Hitachi, analysts believe Kubota is more attractive than Hitachi.

Hitachi has a beta of 0.750, which suggesting that the stock is 24.977% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kubota has a beta of 1.030, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 3.027%.

Hitachi has a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.03%. Kubota offers a yield of 3.05% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.83 per share. Hitachi pays 24.47% of its earnings as a dividend. Kubota pays out 24.99% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Hitachi quarterly revenues are $16.9B, which are larger than Kubota quarterly revenues of $4.7B. Hitachi's net income of $975.7M is higher than Kubota's net income of $271.1M. Notably, Hitachi's price-to-earnings ratio is 5.48x while Kubota's PE ratio is 7.89x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Hitachi is 0.78x versus 0.64x for Kubota. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Kyocera has a net margin of 5.77% compared to Hitachi's net margin of -3.6%. Hitachi's return on equity of 10.37% beat Kyocera's return on equity of 0.75%.

Hitachi has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Kyocera has an analysts' consensus of $11.97 which suggests that it could grow by 0.57%. Given that Kyocera has higher upside potential than Hitachi, analysts believe Kyocera is more attractive than Hitachi.

Hitachi has a beta of 0.750, which suggesting that the stock is 24.977% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kyocera has a beta of 0.326, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 67.401%.

Hitachi has a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.03%. Kyocera offers a yield of 2.7% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share. Hitachi pays 24.47% of its earnings as a dividend. Kyocera pays out 304.23% of its earnings as a dividend. Hitachi's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Kyocera's is not.

Hitachi quarterly revenues are $16.9B, which are larger than Kyocera quarterly revenues of $3.2B. Hitachi's net income of $975.7M is higher than Kyocera's net income of -$116.4M. Notably, Hitachi's price-to-earnings ratio is 5.48x while Kyocera's PE ratio is 102.04x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Hitachi is 0.78x versus 1.25x for Kyocera. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

LogProstyle has a net margin of 5.77% compared to Hitachi's net margin of --. Hitachi's return on equity of 10.37% beat LogProstyle's return on equity of --.

Hitachi has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand LogProstyle has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Hitachi has higher upside potential than LogProstyle, analysts believe Hitachi is more attractive than LogProstyle.

Hitachi has a beta of 0.750, which suggesting that the stock is 24.977% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison LogProstyle has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Hitachi has a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.03%. LogProstyle offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Hitachi pays 24.47% of its earnings as a dividend. LogProstyle pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Hitachi's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Hitachi quarterly revenues are $16.9B, which are larger than LogProstyle quarterly revenues of --. Hitachi's net income of $975.7M is higher than LogProstyle's net income of --. Notably, Hitachi's price-to-earnings ratio is 5.48x while LogProstyle's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Hitachi is 0.78x versus -- for LogProstyle. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

SECOM has a net margin of 5.77% compared to Hitachi's net margin of 9.53%. Hitachi's return on equity of 10.37% beat SECOM's return on equity of 7.5%.

Hitachi has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand SECOM has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Hitachi has higher upside potential than SECOM, analysts believe Hitachi is more attractive than SECOM.

Hitachi has a beta of 0.750, which suggesting that the stock is 24.977% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison SECOM has a beta of 0.471, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 52.9%.

Hitachi has a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.03%. SECOM offers a yield of 1.68% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share. Hitachi pays 24.47% of its earnings as a dividend. SECOM pays out 36.72% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Hitachi quarterly revenues are $16.9B, which are larger than SECOM quarterly revenues of $2B. Hitachi's net income of $975.7M is higher than SECOM's net income of $190.3M. Notably, Hitachi's price-to-earnings ratio is 5.48x while SECOM's PE ratio is 27.56x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Hitachi is 0.78x versus 2.85x for SECOM. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.