HLDCY Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Sino Land has a net margin of -- compared to Henderson Land Development's net margin of --. Henderson Land Development's return on equity of 1.84% beat Sino Land's return on equity of 2.17%.

Henderson Land Development has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Sino Land has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Henderson Land Development has higher upside potential than Sino Land, analysts believe Henderson Land Development is more attractive than Sino Land.

Henderson Land Development has a beta of 0.569, which suggesting that the stock is 43.115% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Sino Land has a beta of 0.334, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 66.649%.

Henderson Land Development has a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.64%. Sino Land offers a yield of 7.12% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share. Henderson Land Development pays 138.42% of its earnings as a dividend. Sino Land pays out 21.54% of its earnings as a dividend. Sino Land's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Henderson Land Development's is not.

Henderson Land Development quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Sino Land quarterly revenues of --. Henderson Land Development's net income of -- is lower than Sino Land's net income of --. Notably, Henderson Land Development's price-to-earnings ratio is 20.81x while Sino Land's PE ratio is 19.58x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Henderson Land Development is 5.18x versus 9.19x for Sino Land. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Sun Hung Kai Properties has a net margin of -- compared to Henderson Land Development's net margin of --. Henderson Land Development's return on equity of 1.84% beat Sun Hung Kai Properties's return on equity of 2.86%.

Henderson Land Development has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Sun Hung Kai Properties has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Henderson Land Development has higher upside potential than Sun Hung Kai Properties, analysts believe Henderson Land Development is more attractive than Sun Hung Kai Properties.

Henderson Land Development has a beta of 0.569, which suggesting that the stock is 43.115% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Sun Hung Kai Properties has a beta of 0.443, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 55.673%.

Henderson Land Development has a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.64%. Sun Hung Kai Properties offers a yield of 4.16% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.12 per share. Henderson Land Development pays 138.42% of its earnings as a dividend. Sun Hung Kai Properties pays out 70.75% of its earnings as a dividend. Sun Hung Kai Properties's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Henderson Land Development's is not.

Henderson Land Development quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Sun Hung Kai Properties quarterly revenues of --. Henderson Land Development's net income of -- is lower than Sun Hung Kai Properties's net income of --. Notably, Henderson Land Development's price-to-earnings ratio is 20.81x while Sun Hung Kai Properties's PE ratio is 15.01x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Henderson Land Development is 5.18x versus 3.12x for Sun Hung Kai Properties. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Tian An China Investments has a net margin of -- compared to Henderson Land Development's net margin of --. Henderson Land Development's return on equity of 1.84% beat Tian An China Investments's return on equity of -0.73%.

Henderson Land Development has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Tian An China Investments has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Henderson Land Development has higher upside potential than Tian An China Investments, analysts believe Henderson Land Development is more attractive than Tian An China Investments.

Henderson Land Development has a beta of 0.569, which suggesting that the stock is 43.115% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Tian An China Investments has a beta of -0.026, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 102.559%.

Henderson Land Development has a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.64%. Tian An China Investments offers a yield of 7.79% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share. Henderson Land Development pays 138.42% of its earnings as a dividend. Tian An China Investments pays out -141.59% of its earnings as a dividend.

Henderson Land Development quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Tian An China Investments quarterly revenues of --. Henderson Land Development's net income of -- is lower than Tian An China Investments's net income of --. Notably, Henderson Land Development's price-to-earnings ratio is 20.81x while Tian An China Investments's PE ratio is 7.16x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Henderson Land Development is 5.18x versus 1.87x for Tian An China Investments. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

The Wharf (Holdings) has a net margin of -- compared to Henderson Land Development's net margin of --. Henderson Land Development's return on equity of 1.84% beat The Wharf (Holdings)'s return on equity of -1.64%.

Henderson Land Development has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand The Wharf (Holdings) has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Henderson Land Development has higher upside potential than The Wharf (Holdings), analysts believe Henderson Land Development is more attractive than The Wharf (Holdings).

Henderson Land Development has a beta of 0.569, which suggesting that the stock is 43.115% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison The Wharf (Holdings) has a beta of 0.174, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 82.555%.

Henderson Land Development has a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.64%. The Wharf (Holdings) offers a yield of 1.71% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share. Henderson Land Development pays 138.42% of its earnings as a dividend. The Wharf (Holdings) pays out -37.9% of its earnings as a dividend.

Henderson Land Development quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than The Wharf (Holdings) quarterly revenues of --. Henderson Land Development's net income of -- is lower than The Wharf (Holdings)'s net income of --. Notably, Henderson Land Development's price-to-earnings ratio is 20.81x while The Wharf (Holdings)'s PE ratio is 80.35x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Henderson Land Development is 5.18x versus 5.91x for The Wharf (Holdings). Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.