TIACF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Poly Property Group has a net margin of -- compared to Tian An China Investments's net margin of --. Tian An China Investments's return on equity of -0.73% beat Poly Property Group's return on equity of 0.4%.

Tian An China Investments has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Poly Property Group has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Tian An China Investments has higher upside potential than Poly Property Group, analysts believe Tian An China Investments is more attractive than Poly Property Group.

Tian An China Investments has a beta of -0.030, which suggesting that the stock is 103.009% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Poly Property Group has a beta of 0.106, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 89.377%.

Tian An China Investments has a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share corresponding to a yield of 7.79%. Poly Property Group offers a yield of 7.79% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Tian An China Investments pays -141.59% of its earnings as a dividend. Poly Property Group pays out 159.56% of its earnings as a dividend.

Tian An China Investments quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Poly Property Group quarterly revenues of --. Tian An China Investments's net income of -- is lower than Poly Property Group's net income of --. Notably, Tian An China Investments's price-to-earnings ratio is 7.16x while Poly Property Group's PE ratio is 25.62x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Tian An China Investments is 1.87x versus 0.12x for Poly Property Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Sino Land has a net margin of -- compared to Tian An China Investments's net margin of --. Tian An China Investments's return on equity of -0.73% beat Sino Land's return on equity of 2.17%.

Tian An China Investments has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Sino Land has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Tian An China Investments has higher upside potential than Sino Land, analysts believe Tian An China Investments is more attractive than Sino Land.

Tian An China Investments has a beta of -0.030, which suggesting that the stock is 103.009% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Sino Land has a beta of 0.304, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 69.608%.

Tian An China Investments has a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share corresponding to a yield of 7.79%. Sino Land offers a yield of 6.59% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share. Tian An China Investments pays -141.59% of its earnings as a dividend. Sino Land pays out 21.54% of its earnings as a dividend. Sino Land's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Tian An China Investments quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Sino Land quarterly revenues of --. Tian An China Investments's net income of -- is lower than Sino Land's net income of --. Notably, Tian An China Investments's price-to-earnings ratio is 7.16x while Sino Land's PE ratio is 19.76x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Tian An China Investments is 1.87x versus 9.94x for Sino Land. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Sun Hung Kai Properties has a net margin of -- compared to Tian An China Investments's net margin of --. Tian An China Investments's return on equity of -0.73% beat Sun Hung Kai Properties's return on equity of 2.86%.

Tian An China Investments has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Sun Hung Kai Properties has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Tian An China Investments has higher upside potential than Sun Hung Kai Properties, analysts believe Tian An China Investments is more attractive than Sun Hung Kai Properties.

Tian An China Investments has a beta of -0.030, which suggesting that the stock is 103.009% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Sun Hung Kai Properties has a beta of 0.450, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 54.985%.

Tian An China Investments has a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share corresponding to a yield of 7.79%. Sun Hung Kai Properties offers a yield of 4.17% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.12 per share. Tian An China Investments pays -141.59% of its earnings as a dividend. Sun Hung Kai Properties pays out 70.75% of its earnings as a dividend. Sun Hung Kai Properties's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Tian An China Investments quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Sun Hung Kai Properties quarterly revenues of --. Tian An China Investments's net income of -- is lower than Sun Hung Kai Properties's net income of --. Notably, Tian An China Investments's price-to-earnings ratio is 7.16x while Sun Hung Kai Properties's PE ratio is 15.46x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Tian An China Investments is 1.87x versus 3.11x for Sun Hung Kai Properties. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

The Wharf (Holdings) has a net margin of -- compared to Tian An China Investments's net margin of --. Tian An China Investments's return on equity of -0.73% beat The Wharf (Holdings)'s return on equity of -1.64%.

Tian An China Investments has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand The Wharf (Holdings) has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Tian An China Investments has higher upside potential than The Wharf (Holdings), analysts believe Tian An China Investments is more attractive than The Wharf (Holdings).

Tian An China Investments has a beta of -0.030, which suggesting that the stock is 103.009% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison The Wharf (Holdings) has a beta of 0.197, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 80.286%.

Tian An China Investments has a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share corresponding to a yield of 7.79%. The Wharf (Holdings) offers a yield of 1.61% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share. Tian An China Investments pays -141.59% of its earnings as a dividend. The Wharf (Holdings) pays out -37.9% of its earnings as a dividend.

Tian An China Investments quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than The Wharf (Holdings) quarterly revenues of --. Tian An China Investments's net income of -- is lower than The Wharf (Holdings)'s net income of --. Notably, Tian An China Investments's price-to-earnings ratio is 7.16x while The Wharf (Holdings)'s PE ratio is 80.35x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Tian An China Investments is 1.87x versus 6.29x for The Wharf (Holdings). Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.