Financhill
Sell
49

SNLAY Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Last price:
$5.73
Seasonality move :
-5.85%
Day range:
$5.50 - $5.65
52-week range:
$4.50 - $5.90
Dividend yield:
6.59%
P/E ratio:
19.76x
P/S ratio:
9.94x
P/B ratio:
0.48x
Volume:
9.4K
Avg. volume:
1.5K
1-year change:
7.62%
Market cap:
$10.3B
Revenue:
$1.1B
EPS (TTM):
$0.27

Price Performance History

Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks

SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS

GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS

Competitors

Company Revenue Forecast Earnings Forecast Revenue Growth Forecast Earnings Growth Forecast Analyst Price Target Median
SNLAY
Sino Land
-- -- -- -- --
KRYPY
Kerry Properties
-- -- -- -- --
PHKIF
Poly Property Group
-- -- -- -- --
SUHJY
Sun Hung Kai Properties
-- -- -- -- --
TIACF
Tian An China Investments
-- -- -- -- --
WARFY
The Wharf (Holdings)
-- -- -- -- --
Company Price Analyst Target Market Cap P/E Ratio Dividend per Share Dividend Yield Price / LTM Sales
SNLAY
Sino Land
$5.65 -- $10.3B 19.76x $0.10 6.59% 9.94x
KRYPY
Kerry Properties
$12.50 -- $3.6B 36.57x $0.60 6.88% 1.45x
PHKIF
Poly Property Group
$0.17 -- $652.3M 25.62x $0.00 7.79% 0.12x
SUHJY
Sun Hung Kai Properties
$11.54 -- $33.4B 15.46x $0.12 4.17% 3.11x
TIACF
Tian An China Investments
$0.49 -- $722.6M 7.16x $0.01 7.79% 1.87x
WARFY
The Wharf (Holdings)
$6.39 -- $9.8B 80.35x $0.05 1.61% 6.29x
Company Total Debt / Total Capital Beta Debt to Equity Quick Ratio
SNLAY
Sino Land
1.79% 0.284 4.35% 6.16x
KRYPY
Kerry Properties
36.58% -1.869 159.68% 0.61x
PHKIF
Poly Property Group
67.32% 0.805 384.13% 0.52x
SUHJY
Sun Hung Kai Properties
16.81% 0.534 55.99% 0.56x
TIACF
Tian An China Investments
23.41% -0.176 117.2% 0.58x
WARFY
The Wharf (Holdings)
12.54% 0.005 26.2% 0.56x
Company Gross Profit Operating Income Return on Invested Capital Return on Common Equity EBIT Margin Free Cash Flow
SNLAY
Sino Land
-- -- 2.14% 2.17% -- --
KRYPY
Kerry Properties
-- -- 0.46% 0.68% -- -$181.1K
PHKIF
Poly Property Group
-- -- 0.16% 0.4% -- --
SUHJY
Sun Hung Kai Properties
-- -- 2.36% 2.86% -- --
TIACF
Tian An China Investments
-- -- -0.57% -0.73% -- --
WARFY
The Wharf (Holdings)
-- -- -1.43% -1.64% -- --

Sino Land vs. Competitors

  • Which has Higher Returns SNLAY or KRYPY?

    Kerry Properties has a net margin of -- compared to Sino Land's net margin of --. Sino Land's return on equity of 2.17% beat Kerry Properties's return on equity of 0.68%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    SNLAY
    Sino Land
    -- -- $21.9B
    KRYPY
    Kerry Properties
    -- -- $22.7B
  • What do Analysts Say About SNLAY or KRYPY?

    Sino Land has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Kerry Properties has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Sino Land has higher upside potential than Kerry Properties, analysts believe Sino Land is more attractive than Kerry Properties.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    SNLAY
    Sino Land
    0 0 0
    KRYPY
    Kerry Properties
    0 0 0
  • Is SNLAY or KRYPY More Risky?

    Sino Land has a beta of 0.304, which suggesting that the stock is 69.608% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kerry Properties has a beta of 0.117, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 88.271%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock SNLAY or KRYPY?

    Sino Land has a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.59%. Kerry Properties offers a yield of 6.88% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.60 per share. Sino Land pays 21.54% of its earnings as a dividend. Kerry Properties pays out 242.45% of its earnings as a dividend. Sino Land's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Kerry Properties's is not.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios SNLAY or KRYPY?

    Sino Land quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Kerry Properties quarterly revenues of --. Sino Land's net income of -- is lower than Kerry Properties's net income of --. Notably, Sino Land's price-to-earnings ratio is 19.76x while Kerry Properties's PE ratio is 36.57x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Sino Land is 9.94x versus 1.45x for Kerry Properties. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    SNLAY
    Sino Land
    9.94x 19.76x -- --
    KRYPY
    Kerry Properties
    1.45x 36.57x -- --
  • Which has Higher Returns SNLAY or PHKIF?

    Poly Property Group has a net margin of -- compared to Sino Land's net margin of --. Sino Land's return on equity of 2.17% beat Poly Property Group's return on equity of 0.4%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    SNLAY
    Sino Land
    -- -- $21.9B
    PHKIF
    Poly Property Group
    -- -- $16B
  • What do Analysts Say About SNLAY or PHKIF?

    Sino Land has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Poly Property Group has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Sino Land has higher upside potential than Poly Property Group, analysts believe Sino Land is more attractive than Poly Property Group.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    SNLAY
    Sino Land
    0 0 0
    PHKIF
    Poly Property Group
    0 0 0
  • Is SNLAY or PHKIF More Risky?

    Sino Land has a beta of 0.304, which suggesting that the stock is 69.608% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Poly Property Group has a beta of 0.106, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 89.377%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock SNLAY or PHKIF?

    Sino Land has a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.59%. Poly Property Group offers a yield of 7.79% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Sino Land pays 21.54% of its earnings as a dividend. Poly Property Group pays out 159.56% of its earnings as a dividend. Sino Land's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Poly Property Group's is not.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios SNLAY or PHKIF?

    Sino Land quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Poly Property Group quarterly revenues of --. Sino Land's net income of -- is lower than Poly Property Group's net income of --. Notably, Sino Land's price-to-earnings ratio is 19.76x while Poly Property Group's PE ratio is 25.62x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Sino Land is 9.94x versus 0.12x for Poly Property Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    SNLAY
    Sino Land
    9.94x 19.76x -- --
    PHKIF
    Poly Property Group
    0.12x 25.62x -- --
  • Which has Higher Returns SNLAY or SUHJY?

    Sun Hung Kai Properties has a net margin of -- compared to Sino Land's net margin of --. Sino Land's return on equity of 2.17% beat Sun Hung Kai Properties's return on equity of 2.86%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    SNLAY
    Sino Land
    -- -- $21.9B
    SUHJY
    Sun Hung Kai Properties
    -- -- $94.2B
  • What do Analysts Say About SNLAY or SUHJY?

    Sino Land has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Sun Hung Kai Properties has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Sino Land has higher upside potential than Sun Hung Kai Properties, analysts believe Sino Land is more attractive than Sun Hung Kai Properties.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    SNLAY
    Sino Land
    0 0 0
    SUHJY
    Sun Hung Kai Properties
    0 0 0
  • Is SNLAY or SUHJY More Risky?

    Sino Land has a beta of 0.304, which suggesting that the stock is 69.608% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Sun Hung Kai Properties has a beta of 0.450, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 54.985%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock SNLAY or SUHJY?

    Sino Land has a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.59%. Sun Hung Kai Properties offers a yield of 4.17% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.12 per share. Sino Land pays 21.54% of its earnings as a dividend. Sun Hung Kai Properties pays out 70.75% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios SNLAY or SUHJY?

    Sino Land quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Sun Hung Kai Properties quarterly revenues of --. Sino Land's net income of -- is lower than Sun Hung Kai Properties's net income of --. Notably, Sino Land's price-to-earnings ratio is 19.76x while Sun Hung Kai Properties's PE ratio is 15.46x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Sino Land is 9.94x versus 3.11x for Sun Hung Kai Properties. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    SNLAY
    Sino Land
    9.94x 19.76x -- --
    SUHJY
    Sun Hung Kai Properties
    3.11x 15.46x -- --
  • Which has Higher Returns SNLAY or TIACF?

    Tian An China Investments has a net margin of -- compared to Sino Land's net margin of --. Sino Land's return on equity of 2.17% beat Tian An China Investments's return on equity of -0.73%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    SNLAY
    Sino Land
    -- -- $21.9B
    TIACF
    Tian An China Investments
    -- -- $4.7B
  • What do Analysts Say About SNLAY or TIACF?

    Sino Land has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Tian An China Investments has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Sino Land has higher upside potential than Tian An China Investments, analysts believe Sino Land is more attractive than Tian An China Investments.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    SNLAY
    Sino Land
    0 0 0
    TIACF
    Tian An China Investments
    0 0 0
  • Is SNLAY or TIACF More Risky?

    Sino Land has a beta of 0.304, which suggesting that the stock is 69.608% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Tian An China Investments has a beta of -0.030, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 103.009%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock SNLAY or TIACF?

    Sino Land has a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.59%. Tian An China Investments offers a yield of 7.79% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share. Sino Land pays 21.54% of its earnings as a dividend. Tian An China Investments pays out -141.59% of its earnings as a dividend. Sino Land's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios SNLAY or TIACF?

    Sino Land quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Tian An China Investments quarterly revenues of --. Sino Land's net income of -- is lower than Tian An China Investments's net income of --. Notably, Sino Land's price-to-earnings ratio is 19.76x while Tian An China Investments's PE ratio is 7.16x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Sino Land is 9.94x versus 1.87x for Tian An China Investments. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    SNLAY
    Sino Land
    9.94x 19.76x -- --
    TIACF
    Tian An China Investments
    1.87x 7.16x -- --
  • Which has Higher Returns SNLAY or WARFY?

    The Wharf (Holdings) has a net margin of -- compared to Sino Land's net margin of --. Sino Land's return on equity of 2.17% beat The Wharf (Holdings)'s return on equity of -1.64%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    SNLAY
    Sino Land
    -- -- $21.9B
    WARFY
    The Wharf (Holdings)
    -- -- $20.4B
  • What do Analysts Say About SNLAY or WARFY?

    Sino Land has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand The Wharf (Holdings) has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Sino Land has higher upside potential than The Wharf (Holdings), analysts believe Sino Land is more attractive than The Wharf (Holdings).

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    SNLAY
    Sino Land
    0 0 0
    WARFY
    The Wharf (Holdings)
    0 0 0
  • Is SNLAY or WARFY More Risky?

    Sino Land has a beta of 0.304, which suggesting that the stock is 69.608% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison The Wharf (Holdings) has a beta of 0.197, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 80.286%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock SNLAY or WARFY?

    Sino Land has a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.59%. The Wharf (Holdings) offers a yield of 1.61% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share. Sino Land pays 21.54% of its earnings as a dividend. The Wharf (Holdings) pays out -37.9% of its earnings as a dividend. Sino Land's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios SNLAY or WARFY?

    Sino Land quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than The Wharf (Holdings) quarterly revenues of --. Sino Land's net income of -- is lower than The Wharf (Holdings)'s net income of --. Notably, Sino Land's price-to-earnings ratio is 19.76x while The Wharf (Holdings)'s PE ratio is 80.35x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Sino Land is 9.94x versus 6.29x for The Wharf (Holdings). Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    SNLAY
    Sino Land
    9.94x 19.76x -- --
    WARFY
    The Wharf (Holdings)
    6.29x 80.35x -- --

SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS

GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS

Popular

Will Oklo Stock Double?
Will Oklo Stock Double?

Oklo (NYSE: OKLO) is only a year removed from its SPAC‑enabled debut,…

Why a $5 Stock Is Suddenly a Cash Machine
Why a $5 Stock Is Suddenly a Cash Machine

If you stopped tracking Grab Holdings (NASDAQ: GRAB) after its 2021 SPAC…

Is Roku Stock Undervalued Now?
Is Roku Stock Undervalued Now?

At roughly $89 a share, Roku (NASDAQ: ROKU) trades for barely…

Stock Ideas

Buy
69
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $4T
P/E Ratio: 56x

Buy
62
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $3.7T
P/E Ratio: 43x

Sell
45
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $3.2T
P/E Ratio: 35x

Alerts

Buy
58
INKT alert for Jul 14

MiNK Therapeutics [INKT] is down 36.03% over the past day.

Buy
51
NEGG alert for Jul 14

Newegg Commerce [NEGG] is down 26.42% over the past day.

Buy
68
ATRO alert for Jul 14

Astronics [ATRO] is down 1.02% over the past day.

THE #1 STOCK ANALYSIS TOOL
TO MAKE SMARTER BUY AND SELL DECISIONS

Show me the best stock