FXCOF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Himax Technologies has a net margin of 4.79% compared to Foxconn Technology's net margin of 5.86%. Foxconn Technology's return on equity of 3.49% beat Himax Technologies's return on equity of 9.08%.

Foxconn Technology has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Himax Technologies has an analysts' consensus of $6.40 which suggests that it could grow by 33.99%. Given that Himax Technologies has higher upside potential than Foxconn Technology, analysts believe Himax Technologies is more attractive than Foxconn Technology.

Foxconn Technology has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Himax Technologies has a beta of 2.067, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 106.663%.

Foxconn Technology has a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.62%. Himax Technologies offers a yield of 3.58% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.29 per share. Foxconn Technology pays 53.12% of its earnings as a dividend. Himax Technologies pays out 165.7% of its earnings as a dividend. Foxconn Technology's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Himax Technologies's is not.

Foxconn Technology quarterly revenues are $626.9M, which are larger than Himax Technologies quarterly revenues of $222.4M. Foxconn Technology's net income of $30M is higher than Himax Technologies's net income of $13M. Notably, Foxconn Technology's price-to-earnings ratio is 21.39x while Himax Technologies's PE ratio is 18.35x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Foxconn Technology is 1.47x versus 1.53x for Himax Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Hon Hai Precision Industry has a net margin of 4.79% compared to Foxconn Technology's net margin of 2.66%. Foxconn Technology's return on equity of 3.49% beat Hon Hai Precision Industry's return on equity of 9.23%.

Foxconn Technology has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Hon Hai Precision Industry has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Foxconn Technology has higher upside potential than Hon Hai Precision Industry, analysts believe Foxconn Technology is more attractive than Hon Hai Precision Industry.

Foxconn Technology has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Hon Hai Precision Industry has a beta of 0.657, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 34.28%.

Foxconn Technology has a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.62%. Hon Hai Precision Industry offers a yield of 2.9% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.33 per share. Foxconn Technology pays 53.12% of its earnings as a dividend. Hon Hai Precision Industry pays out 56.81% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Foxconn Technology quarterly revenues are $626.9M, which are smaller than Hon Hai Precision Industry quarterly revenues of $57.5B. Foxconn Technology's net income of $30M is lower than Hon Hai Precision Industry's net income of $1.5B. Notably, Foxconn Technology's price-to-earnings ratio is 21.39x while Hon Hai Precision Industry's PE ratio is 15.95x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Foxconn Technology is 1.47x versus 0.39x for Hon Hai Precision Industry. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

NVIDIA has a net margin of 4.79% compared to Foxconn Technology's net margin of 55.04%. Foxconn Technology's return on equity of 3.49% beat NVIDIA's return on equity of 126.43%.

Foxconn Technology has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand NVIDIA has an analysts' consensus of $172.80 which suggests that it could grow by 23.24%. Given that NVIDIA has higher upside potential than Foxconn Technology, analysts believe NVIDIA is more attractive than Foxconn Technology.

Foxconn Technology has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison NVIDIA has a beta of 1.635, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 63.477%.

Foxconn Technology has a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.62%. NVIDIA offers a yield of 0.02% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share. Foxconn Technology pays 53.12% of its earnings as a dividend. NVIDIA pays out 1.33% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Foxconn Technology quarterly revenues are $626.9M, which are smaller than NVIDIA quarterly revenues of $35.1B. Foxconn Technology's net income of $30M is lower than NVIDIA's net income of $19.3B. Notably, Foxconn Technology's price-to-earnings ratio is 21.39x while NVIDIA's PE ratio is 55.18x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Foxconn Technology is 1.47x versus 30.78x for NVIDIA. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Semilux International has a net margin of 4.79% compared to Foxconn Technology's net margin of --. Foxconn Technology's return on equity of 3.49% beat Semilux International's return on equity of --.

Foxconn Technology has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Semilux International has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Foxconn Technology has higher upside potential than Semilux International, analysts believe Foxconn Technology is more attractive than Semilux International.

Foxconn Technology has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Semilux International has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Foxconn Technology has a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.62%. Semilux International offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Foxconn Technology pays 53.12% of its earnings as a dividend. Semilux International pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Foxconn Technology's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Foxconn Technology quarterly revenues are $626.9M, which are larger than Semilux International quarterly revenues of --. Foxconn Technology's net income of $30M is higher than Semilux International's net income of --. Notably, Foxconn Technology's price-to-earnings ratio is 21.39x while Semilux International's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Foxconn Technology is 1.47x versus -- for Semilux International. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.