FXCOF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Himax Technologies has a net margin of 3.18% compared to Foxconn Technology's net margin of 9.29%. Foxconn Technology's return on equity of 3.39% beat Himax Technologies's return on equity of 9.89%.

Foxconn Technology has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Himax Technologies has an analysts' consensus of $9.94 which suggests that it could grow by 6.42%. Given that Himax Technologies has higher upside potential than Foxconn Technology, analysts believe Himax Technologies is more attractive than Foxconn Technology.

Foxconn Technology has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Himax Technologies has a beta of 2.155, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 115.532%.

Foxconn Technology has a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.72%. Himax Technologies offers a yield of 3.96% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.37 per share. Foxconn Technology pays 59.19% of its earnings as a dividend. Himax Technologies pays out 63.82% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Foxconn Technology quarterly revenues are $911.9M, which are larger than Himax Technologies quarterly revenues of $215.1M. Foxconn Technology's net income of $29M is higher than Himax Technologies's net income of $20M. Notably, Foxconn Technology's price-to-earnings ratio is 22.06x while Himax Technologies's PE ratio is 15.29x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Foxconn Technology is 0.84x versus 1.57x for Himax Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Hon Hai Precision Industry has a net margin of 3.18% compared to Foxconn Technology's net margin of 2.56%. Foxconn Technology's return on equity of 3.39% beat Hon Hai Precision Industry's return on equity of 9.71%.

Foxconn Technology has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Hon Hai Precision Industry has an analysts' consensus of $14.00 which suggests that it could grow by 27.81%. Given that Hon Hai Precision Industry has higher upside potential than Foxconn Technology, analysts believe Hon Hai Precision Industry is more attractive than Foxconn Technology.

Foxconn Technology has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Hon Hai Precision Industry has a beta of 0.738, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 26.163%.

Foxconn Technology has a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.72%. Hon Hai Precision Industry offers a yield of 3.54% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.39 per share. Foxconn Technology pays 59.19% of its earnings as a dividend. Hon Hai Precision Industry pays out 54.44% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Foxconn Technology quarterly revenues are $911.9M, which are smaller than Hon Hai Precision Industry quarterly revenues of $50B. Foxconn Technology's net income of $29M is lower than Hon Hai Precision Industry's net income of $1.3B. Notably, Foxconn Technology's price-to-earnings ratio is 22.06x while Hon Hai Precision Industry's PE ratio is 14.53x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Foxconn Technology is 0.84x versus 0.35x for Hon Hai Precision Industry. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Semilux International has a net margin of 3.18% compared to Foxconn Technology's net margin of --. Foxconn Technology's return on equity of 3.39% beat Semilux International's return on equity of --.

Foxconn Technology has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Semilux International has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Foxconn Technology has higher upside potential than Semilux International, analysts believe Foxconn Technology is more attractive than Semilux International.

Foxconn Technology has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Semilux International has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Foxconn Technology has a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.72%. Semilux International offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Foxconn Technology pays 59.19% of its earnings as a dividend. Semilux International pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Foxconn Technology's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Foxconn Technology quarterly revenues are $911.9M, which are larger than Semilux International quarterly revenues of --. Foxconn Technology's net income of $29M is higher than Semilux International's net income of --. Notably, Foxconn Technology's price-to-earnings ratio is 22.06x while Semilux International's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Foxconn Technology is 0.84x versus -- for Semilux International. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing has a net margin of 3.18% compared to Foxconn Technology's net margin of 42.98%. Foxconn Technology's return on equity of 3.39% beat Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing's return on equity of 32.1%.

Foxconn Technology has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing has an analysts' consensus of $233.09 which suggests that it could grow by 1.93%. Given that Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing has higher upside potential than Foxconn Technology, analysts believe Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing is more attractive than Foxconn Technology.

Foxconn Technology has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing has a beta of 1.289, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 28.85%.

Foxconn Technology has a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.72%. Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing offers a yield of 1.18% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.78 per share. Foxconn Technology pays 59.19% of its earnings as a dividend. Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing pays out 31.34% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Foxconn Technology quarterly revenues are $911.9M, which are smaller than Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing quarterly revenues of $25.5B. Foxconn Technology's net income of $29M is lower than Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing's net income of $11B. Notably, Foxconn Technology's price-to-earnings ratio is 22.06x while Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing's PE ratio is 29.75x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Foxconn Technology is 0.84x versus 12.26x for Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.