HNHPF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Foxconn Technology has a net margin of 2.56% compared to Hon Hai Precision Industry's net margin of 3.18%. Hon Hai Precision Industry's return on equity of 9.71% beat Foxconn Technology's return on equity of 3.39%.

Hon Hai Precision Industry has a consensus price target of $14.00, signalling upside risk potential of 34.36%. On the other hand Foxconn Technology has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Hon Hai Precision Industry has higher upside potential than Foxconn Technology, analysts believe Hon Hai Precision Industry is more attractive than Foxconn Technology.

Hon Hai Precision Industry has a beta of 0.741, which suggesting that the stock is 25.875% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Foxconn Technology has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Hon Hai Precision Industry has a quarterly dividend of $0.33 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.15%. Foxconn Technology offers a yield of 2.62% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share. Hon Hai Precision Industry pays 54.44% of its earnings as a dividend. Foxconn Technology pays out 59.19% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Hon Hai Precision Industry quarterly revenues are $50B, which are larger than Foxconn Technology quarterly revenues of $911.9M. Hon Hai Precision Industry's net income of $1.3B is higher than Foxconn Technology's net income of $29M. Notably, Hon Hai Precision Industry's price-to-earnings ratio is 13.82x while Foxconn Technology's PE ratio is 22.06x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Hon Hai Precision Industry is 0.33x versus 0.84x for Foxconn Technology. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Himax Technologies has a net margin of 2.56% compared to Hon Hai Precision Industry's net margin of 9.29%. Hon Hai Precision Industry's return on equity of 9.71% beat Himax Technologies's return on equity of 9.89%.

Hon Hai Precision Industry has a consensus price target of $14.00, signalling upside risk potential of 34.36%. On the other hand Himax Technologies has an analysts' consensus of $10.74 which suggests that it could grow by 11.56%. Given that Hon Hai Precision Industry has higher upside potential than Himax Technologies, analysts believe Hon Hai Precision Industry is more attractive than Himax Technologies.

Hon Hai Precision Industry has a beta of 0.741, which suggesting that the stock is 25.875% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Himax Technologies has a beta of 2.165, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 116.52%.

Hon Hai Precision Industry has a quarterly dividend of $0.33 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.15%. Himax Technologies offers a yield of 3.26% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.29 per share. Hon Hai Precision Industry pays 54.44% of its earnings as a dividend. Himax Technologies pays out 63.82% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Hon Hai Precision Industry quarterly revenues are $50B, which are larger than Himax Technologies quarterly revenues of $215.1M. Hon Hai Precision Industry's net income of $1.3B is higher than Himax Technologies's net income of $20M. Notably, Hon Hai Precision Industry's price-to-earnings ratio is 13.82x while Himax Technologies's PE ratio is 14.58x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Hon Hai Precision Industry is 0.33x versus 1.49x for Himax Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Semilux International has a net margin of 2.56% compared to Hon Hai Precision Industry's net margin of --. Hon Hai Precision Industry's return on equity of 9.71% beat Semilux International's return on equity of --.

Hon Hai Precision Industry has a consensus price target of $14.00, signalling upside risk potential of 34.36%. On the other hand Semilux International has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Hon Hai Precision Industry has higher upside potential than Semilux International, analysts believe Hon Hai Precision Industry is more attractive than Semilux International.

Hon Hai Precision Industry has a beta of 0.741, which suggesting that the stock is 25.875% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Semilux International has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Hon Hai Precision Industry has a quarterly dividend of $0.33 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.15%. Semilux International offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Hon Hai Precision Industry pays 54.44% of its earnings as a dividend. Semilux International pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Hon Hai Precision Industry's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Hon Hai Precision Industry quarterly revenues are $50B, which are larger than Semilux International quarterly revenues of --. Hon Hai Precision Industry's net income of $1.3B is higher than Semilux International's net income of --. Notably, Hon Hai Precision Industry's price-to-earnings ratio is 13.82x while Semilux International's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Hon Hai Precision Industry is 0.33x versus -- for Semilux International. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing has a net margin of 2.56% compared to Hon Hai Precision Industry's net margin of 42.98%. Hon Hai Precision Industry's return on equity of 9.71% beat Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing's return on equity of 32.1%.

Hon Hai Precision Industry has a consensus price target of $14.00, signalling upside risk potential of 34.36%. On the other hand Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing has an analysts' consensus of $226.03 which suggests that it could grow by 7.88%. Given that Hon Hai Precision Industry has higher upside potential than Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing, analysts believe Hon Hai Precision Industry is more attractive than Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing.

Hon Hai Precision Industry has a beta of 0.741, which suggesting that the stock is 25.875% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing has a beta of 1.265, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 26.502%.

Hon Hai Precision Industry has a quarterly dividend of $0.33 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.15%. Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing offers a yield of 1.28% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.75 per share. Hon Hai Precision Industry pays 54.44% of its earnings as a dividend. Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing pays out 31.34% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Hon Hai Precision Industry quarterly revenues are $50B, which are larger than Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing quarterly revenues of $25.5B. Hon Hai Precision Industry's net income of $1.3B is lower than Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing's net income of $11B. Notably, Hon Hai Precision Industry's price-to-earnings ratio is 13.82x while Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing's PE ratio is 26.95x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Hon Hai Precision Industry is 0.33x versus 11.23x for Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.