FRCOY Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Honda Motor has a net margin of 15.24% compared to Fast Retailing's net margin of 1.86%. Fast Retailing's return on equity of 18.84% beat Honda Motor's return on equity of 7.55%.

Fast Retailing has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Honda Motor has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 54.01%. Given that Honda Motor has higher upside potential than Fast Retailing, analysts believe Honda Motor is more attractive than Fast Retailing.

Fast Retailing has a beta of 0.819, which suggesting that the stock is 18.087% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Honda Motor has a beta of 0.614, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 38.619%.

Fast Retailing has a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.77%. Honda Motor offers a yield of 5.21% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.67 per share. Fast Retailing pays 28.03% of its earnings as a dividend. Honda Motor pays out 21.85% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Fast Retailing quarterly revenues are $5B, which are smaller than Honda Motor quarterly revenues of $36.3B. Fast Retailing's net income of $763.6M is higher than Honda Motor's net income of $673.4M. Notably, Fast Retailing's price-to-earnings ratio is 41.85x while Honda Motor's PE ratio is 6.72x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Fast Retailing is 5.02x versus 0.30x for Honda Motor. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Nissan Motor has a net margin of 15.24% compared to Fast Retailing's net margin of 0.95%. Fast Retailing's return on equity of 18.84% beat Nissan Motor's return on equity of 5.65%.

Fast Retailing has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Nissan Motor has an analysts' consensus of $7.26 which suggests that it could grow by 19.34%. Given that Nissan Motor has higher upside potential than Fast Retailing, analysts believe Nissan Motor is more attractive than Fast Retailing.

Fast Retailing has a beta of 0.819, which suggesting that the stock is 18.087% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Nissan Motor has a beta of 0.977, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 2.305%.

Fast Retailing has a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.77%. Nissan Motor offers a yield of 4.19% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.19 per share. Fast Retailing pays 28.03% of its earnings as a dividend. Nissan Motor pays out 13.77% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Fast Retailing quarterly revenues are $5B, which are smaller than Nissan Motor quarterly revenues of $19.2B. Fast Retailing's net income of $763.6M is higher than Nissan Motor's net income of $183.2M. Notably, Fast Retailing's price-to-earnings ratio is 41.85x while Nissan Motor's PE ratio is 4.91x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Fast Retailing is 5.02x versus 0.13x for Nissan Motor. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Ryohin Keikaku has a net margin of 15.24% compared to Fast Retailing's net margin of 10.09%. Fast Retailing's return on equity of 18.84% beat Ryohin Keikaku's return on equity of 13.04%.

Fast Retailing has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Ryohin Keikaku has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Fast Retailing has higher upside potential than Ryohin Keikaku, analysts believe Fast Retailing is more attractive than Ryohin Keikaku.

Fast Retailing has a beta of 0.819, which suggesting that the stock is 18.087% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Ryohin Keikaku has a beta of 0.816, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 18.448%.

Fast Retailing has a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.77%. Ryohin Keikaku offers a yield of 1.12% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share. Fast Retailing pays 28.03% of its earnings as a dividend. Ryohin Keikaku pays out 26.57% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Fast Retailing quarterly revenues are $5B, which are larger than Ryohin Keikaku quarterly revenues of $1.1B. Fast Retailing's net income of $763.6M is higher than Ryohin Keikaku's net income of $115.8M. Notably, Fast Retailing's price-to-earnings ratio is 41.85x while Ryohin Keikaku's PE ratio is 22.06x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Fast Retailing is 5.02x versus 1.38x for Ryohin Keikaku. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Toyota Motor has a net margin of 15.24% compared to Fast Retailing's net margin of 5.01%. Fast Retailing's return on equity of 18.84% beat Toyota Motor's return on equity of 12.15%.

Fast Retailing has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Toyota Motor has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 27.84%. Given that Toyota Motor has higher upside potential than Fast Retailing, analysts believe Toyota Motor is more attractive than Fast Retailing.

Fast Retailing has a beta of 0.819, which suggesting that the stock is 18.087% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Toyota Motor has a beta of 0.667, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 33.329%.

Fast Retailing has a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.77%. Toyota Motor offers a yield of 3.01% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $2.60 per share. Fast Retailing pays 28.03% of its earnings as a dividend. Toyota Motor pays out 17.8% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Fast Retailing quarterly revenues are $5B, which are smaller than Toyota Motor quarterly revenues of $77B. Fast Retailing's net income of $763.6M is lower than Toyota Motor's net income of $3.9B. Notably, Fast Retailing's price-to-earnings ratio is 41.85x while Toyota Motor's PE ratio is 8.61x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Fast Retailing is 5.02x versus 0.79x for Toyota Motor. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.