DWAY Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

H&E Equipment Services has a net margin of -212.64% compared to DriveItAway Holdings's net margin of -1.94%. DriveItAway Holdings's return on equity of -- beat H&E Equipment Services's return on equity of 15.4%.

DriveItAway Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand H&E Equipment Services has an analysts' consensus of $85.00 which suggests that it could fall by -10.19%. Given that H&E Equipment Services has higher upside potential than DriveItAway Holdings, analysts believe H&E Equipment Services is more attractive than DriveItAway Holdings.

DriveItAway Holdings has a beta of -6.873, which suggesting that the stock is 787.315% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison H&E Equipment Services has a beta of 1.869, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 86.927%.

DriveItAway Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. H&E Equipment Services offers a yield of 1.16% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.28 per share. DriveItAway Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. H&E Equipment Services pays out 32.7% of its earnings as a dividend. H&E Equipment Services's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

DriveItAway Holdings quarterly revenues are $210.7K, which are smaller than H&E Equipment Services quarterly revenues of $319.5M. DriveItAway Holdings's net income of -$448K is higher than H&E Equipment Services's net income of -$6.2M. Notably, DriveItAway Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while H&E Equipment Services's PE ratio is 38.01x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for DriveItAway Holdings is 21.55x versus 2.36x for H&E Equipment Services. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Hertz Global Holdings has a net margin of -212.64% compared to DriveItAway Holdings's net margin of -24.44%. DriveItAway Holdings's return on equity of -- beat Hertz Global Holdings's return on equity of -291.93%.

DriveItAway Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Hertz Global Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $3.81 which suggests that it could fall by -45.9%. Given that Hertz Global Holdings has higher upside potential than DriveItAway Holdings, analysts believe Hertz Global Holdings is more attractive than DriveItAway Holdings.

DriveItAway Holdings has a beta of -6.873, which suggesting that the stock is 787.315% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Hertz Global Holdings has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

DriveItAway Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Hertz Global Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. DriveItAway Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Hertz Global Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

DriveItAway Holdings quarterly revenues are $210.7K, which are smaller than Hertz Global Holdings quarterly revenues of $1.8B. DriveItAway Holdings's net income of -$448K is higher than Hertz Global Holdings's net income of -$443M. Notably, DriveItAway Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Hertz Global Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for DriveItAway Holdings is 21.55x versus 0.25x for Hertz Global Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Ryder System has a net margin of -212.64% compared to DriveItAway Holdings's net margin of 3.12%. DriveItAway Holdings's return on equity of -- beat Ryder System's return on equity of 16.38%.

DriveItAway Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Ryder System has an analysts' consensus of $161.49 which suggests that it could grow by 8.18%. Given that Ryder System has higher upside potential than DriveItAway Holdings, analysts believe Ryder System is more attractive than DriveItAway Holdings.

DriveItAway Holdings has a beta of -6.873, which suggesting that the stock is 787.315% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Ryder System has a beta of 0.947, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 5.336%.

DriveItAway Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Ryder System offers a yield of 2.17% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.81 per share. DriveItAway Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Ryder System pays out 27.61% of its earnings as a dividend. Ryder System's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

DriveItAway Holdings quarterly revenues are $210.7K, which are smaller than Ryder System quarterly revenues of $3.1B. DriveItAway Holdings's net income of -$448K is lower than Ryder System's net income of $98M. Notably, DriveItAway Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Ryder System's PE ratio is 13.01x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for DriveItAway Holdings is 21.55x versus 0.51x for Ryder System. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

U-Haul Holding has a net margin of -212.64% compared to DriveItAway Holdings's net margin of 4.84%. DriveItAway Holdings's return on equity of -- beat U-Haul Holding's return on equity of 6.1%.

DriveItAway Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand U-Haul Holding has an analysts' consensus of $91.86 which suggests that it could grow by 48.19%. Given that U-Haul Holding has higher upside potential than DriveItAway Holdings, analysts believe U-Haul Holding is more attractive than DriveItAway Holdings.

DriveItAway Holdings has a beta of -6.873, which suggesting that the stock is 787.315% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison U-Haul Holding has a beta of 1.268, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 26.84%.

DriveItAway Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. U-Haul Holding offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. DriveItAway Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. U-Haul Holding pays out 5.05% of its earnings as a dividend. U-Haul Holding's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

DriveItAway Holdings quarterly revenues are $210.7K, which are smaller than U-Haul Holding quarterly revenues of $1.4B. DriveItAway Holdings's net income of -$448K is lower than U-Haul Holding's net income of $67.2M. Notably, DriveItAway Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while U-Haul Holding's PE ratio is 29.38x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for DriveItAway Holdings is 21.55x versus 2.14x for U-Haul Holding. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.