UHAL Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

DriveItAway Holdings has a net margin of 11.27% compared to U-Haul Holding's net margin of -479.76%. U-Haul Holding's return on equity of 6.65% beat DriveItAway Holdings's return on equity of --.

U-Haul Holding has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 40.09%. On the other hand DriveItAway Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that U-Haul Holding has higher upside potential than DriveItAway Holdings, analysts believe U-Haul Holding is more attractive than DriveItAway Holdings.

U-Haul Holding has a beta of 1.091, which suggesting that the stock is 9.09% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison DriveItAway Holdings has a beta of -5.913, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 691.252%.

U-Haul Holding has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. DriveItAway Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. U-Haul Holding pays 5.05% of its earnings as a dividend. DriveItAway Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. U-Haul Holding's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

U-Haul Holding quarterly revenues are $1.7B, which are larger than DriveItAway Holdings quarterly revenues of $110.4K. U-Haul Holding's net income of $186.8M is higher than DriveItAway Holdings's net income of -$529.7K. Notably, U-Haul Holding's price-to-earnings ratio is 30.99x while DriveItAway Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for U-Haul Holding is 2.44x versus 5.13x for DriveItAway Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Hertz Global Holdings has a net margin of 11.27% compared to U-Haul Holding's net margin of -51.71%. U-Haul Holding's return on equity of 6.65% beat Hertz Global Holdings's return on equity of -114.43%.

U-Haul Holding has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 40.09%. On the other hand Hertz Global Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $8.57 which suggests that it could fall by -0.2%. Given that U-Haul Holding has higher upside potential than Hertz Global Holdings, analysts believe U-Haul Holding is more attractive than Hertz Global Holdings.

U-Haul Holding has a beta of 1.091, which suggesting that the stock is 9.09% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Hertz Global Holdings has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

U-Haul Holding has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Hertz Global Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. U-Haul Holding pays 5.05% of its earnings as a dividend. Hertz Global Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. U-Haul Holding's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

U-Haul Holding quarterly revenues are $1.7B, which are smaller than Hertz Global Holdings quarterly revenues of $2.6B. U-Haul Holding's net income of $186.8M is higher than Hertz Global Holdings's net income of -$1.3B. Notably, U-Haul Holding's price-to-earnings ratio is 30.99x while Hertz Global Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for U-Haul Holding is 2.44x versus 0.12x for Hertz Global Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Ryder System has a net margin of 11.27% compared to U-Haul Holding's net margin of 4.46%. U-Haul Holding's return on equity of 6.65% beat Ryder System's return on equity of 15.55%.

U-Haul Holding has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 40.09%. On the other hand Ryder System has an analysts' consensus of $168.70 which suggests that it could grow by 6.73%. Given that U-Haul Holding has higher upside potential than Ryder System, analysts believe U-Haul Holding is more attractive than Ryder System.

U-Haul Holding has a beta of 1.091, which suggesting that the stock is 9.09% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Ryder System has a beta of 1.298, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 29.778%.

U-Haul Holding has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Ryder System offers a yield of 1.92% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.81 per share. U-Haul Holding pays 5.05% of its earnings as a dividend. Ryder System pays out 31.53% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

U-Haul Holding quarterly revenues are $1.7B, which are smaller than Ryder System quarterly revenues of $3.2B. U-Haul Holding's net income of $186.8M is higher than Ryder System's net income of $142M. Notably, U-Haul Holding's price-to-earnings ratio is 30.99x while Ryder System's PE ratio is 14.79x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for U-Haul Holding is 2.44x versus 0.56x for Ryder System. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

United Rentals has a net margin of 11.27% compared to U-Haul Holding's net margin of 17.74%. U-Haul Holding's return on equity of 6.65% beat United Rentals's return on equity of 31.38%.

U-Haul Holding has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 40.09%. On the other hand United Rentals has an analysts' consensus of $856.32 which suggests that it could grow by 17.72%. Given that U-Haul Holding has higher upside potential than United Rentals, analysts believe U-Haul Holding is more attractive than United Rentals.

U-Haul Holding has a beta of 1.091, which suggesting that the stock is 9.09% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison United Rentals has a beta of 1.658, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 65.812%.

U-Haul Holding has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. United Rentals offers a yield of 0.9% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.63 per share. U-Haul Holding pays 5.05% of its earnings as a dividend. United Rentals pays out 16.75% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

U-Haul Holding quarterly revenues are $1.7B, which are smaller than United Rentals quarterly revenues of $4B. U-Haul Holding's net income of $186.8M is lower than United Rentals's net income of $708M. Notably, U-Haul Holding's price-to-earnings ratio is 30.99x while United Rentals's PE ratio is 19.01x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for U-Haul Holding is 2.44x versus 3.26x for United Rentals. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.