UHAL Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

DriveItAway Holdings has a net margin of -6.67% compared to U-Haul Holding's net margin of -212.64%. U-Haul Holding's return on equity of 4.94% beat DriveItAway Holdings's return on equity of --.

U-Haul Holding has a consensus price target of $90.84, signalling upside risk potential of 43.01%. On the other hand DriveItAway Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that U-Haul Holding has higher upside potential than DriveItAway Holdings, analysts believe U-Haul Holding is more attractive than DriveItAway Holdings.

U-Haul Holding has a beta of 1.282, which suggesting that the stock is 28.163% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison DriveItAway Holdings has a beta of -6.886, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 788.573%.

U-Haul Holding has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. DriveItAway Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. U-Haul Holding pays 9.62% of its earnings as a dividend. DriveItAway Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. U-Haul Holding's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

U-Haul Holding quarterly revenues are $1.2B, which are larger than DriveItAway Holdings quarterly revenues of $210.7K. U-Haul Holding's net income of -$82.3M is lower than DriveItAway Holdings's net income of -$448K. Notably, U-Haul Holding's price-to-earnings ratio is 37.36x while DriveItAway Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for U-Haul Holding is 2.14x versus 17.01x for DriveItAway Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Hertz Global Holdings has a net margin of -6.67% compared to U-Haul Holding's net margin of -24.44%. U-Haul Holding's return on equity of 4.94% beat Hertz Global Holdings's return on equity of -291.93%.

U-Haul Holding has a consensus price target of $90.84, signalling upside risk potential of 43.01%. On the other hand Hertz Global Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $3.81 which suggests that it could fall by -39.55%. Given that U-Haul Holding has higher upside potential than Hertz Global Holdings, analysts believe U-Haul Holding is more attractive than Hertz Global Holdings.

U-Haul Holding has a beta of 1.282, which suggesting that the stock is 28.163% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Hertz Global Holdings has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

U-Haul Holding has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Hertz Global Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. U-Haul Holding pays 9.62% of its earnings as a dividend. Hertz Global Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. U-Haul Holding's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

U-Haul Holding quarterly revenues are $1.2B, which are smaller than Hertz Global Holdings quarterly revenues of $1.8B. U-Haul Holding's net income of -$82.3M is higher than Hertz Global Holdings's net income of -$443M. Notably, U-Haul Holding's price-to-earnings ratio is 37.36x while Hertz Global Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for U-Haul Holding is 2.14x versus 0.22x for Hertz Global Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

McGrath RentCorp has a net margin of -6.67% compared to U-Haul Holding's net margin of 14.44%. U-Haul Holding's return on equity of 4.94% beat McGrath RentCorp's return on equity of 22.58%.

U-Haul Holding has a consensus price target of $90.84, signalling upside risk potential of 43.01%. On the other hand McGrath RentCorp has an analysts' consensus of $144.00 which suggests that it could grow by 24.01%. Given that U-Haul Holding has higher upside potential than McGrath RentCorp, analysts believe U-Haul Holding is more attractive than McGrath RentCorp.

U-Haul Holding has a beta of 1.282, which suggesting that the stock is 28.163% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison McGrath RentCorp has a beta of 0.666, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 33.385%.

U-Haul Holding has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. McGrath RentCorp offers a yield of 1.65% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.49 per share. U-Haul Holding pays 9.62% of its earnings as a dividend. McGrath RentCorp pays out 20.18% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

U-Haul Holding quarterly revenues are $1.2B, which are larger than McGrath RentCorp quarterly revenues of $195.4M. U-Haul Holding's net income of -$82.3M is lower than McGrath RentCorp's net income of $28.2M. Notably, U-Haul Holding's price-to-earnings ratio is 37.36x while McGrath RentCorp's PE ratio is 12.03x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for U-Haul Holding is 2.14x versus 3.11x for McGrath RentCorp. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Ryder System has a net margin of -6.67% compared to U-Haul Holding's net margin of 3.12%. U-Haul Holding's return on equity of 4.94% beat Ryder System's return on equity of 16.38%.

U-Haul Holding has a consensus price target of $90.84, signalling upside risk potential of 43.01%. On the other hand Ryder System has an analysts' consensus of $165.56 which suggests that it could grow by 8.18%. Given that U-Haul Holding has higher upside potential than Ryder System, analysts believe U-Haul Holding is more attractive than Ryder System.

U-Haul Holding has a beta of 1.282, which suggesting that the stock is 28.163% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Ryder System has a beta of 0.966, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 3.406%.

U-Haul Holding has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Ryder System offers a yield of 2.12% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.81 per share. U-Haul Holding pays 9.62% of its earnings as a dividend. Ryder System pays out 27.61% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

U-Haul Holding quarterly revenues are $1.2B, which are smaller than Ryder System quarterly revenues of $3.1B. U-Haul Holding's net income of -$82.3M is lower than Ryder System's net income of $98M. Notably, U-Haul Holding's price-to-earnings ratio is 37.36x while Ryder System's PE ratio is 13.34x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for U-Haul Holding is 2.14x versus 0.53x for Ryder System. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.