CAR Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

H&E Equipment Services has a net margin of 6.89% compared to Avis Budget Group's net margin of 8.07%. Avis Budget Group's return on equity of -- beat H&E Equipment Services's return on equity of 26.17%.

Avis Budget Group has a consensus price target of $171.88, signalling upside risk potential of 51.74%. On the other hand H&E Equipment Services has an analysts' consensus of $69.40 which suggests that it could grow by 28.46%. Given that Avis Budget Group has higher upside potential than H&E Equipment Services, analysts believe Avis Budget Group is more attractive than H&E Equipment Services.

Avis Budget Group has a beta of 2.201, which suggesting that the stock is 120.09% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison H&E Equipment Services has a beta of 1.844, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 84.439%.

Avis Budget Group has a quarterly dividend of $10.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. H&E Equipment Services offers a yield of 2.19% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.28 per share. Avis Budget Group pays 21.75% of its earnings as a dividend. H&E Equipment Services pays out 23.65% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Avis Budget Group quarterly revenues are $3.4B, which are larger than H&E Equipment Services quarterly revenues of $384.9M. Avis Budget Group's net income of $237M is higher than H&E Equipment Services's net income of $31.1M. Notably, Avis Budget Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 7.43x while H&E Equipment Services's PE ratio is 12.74x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Avis Budget Group is 0.25x versus 1.21x for H&E Equipment Services. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Hertz Global Holdings has a net margin of 6.89% compared to Avis Budget Group's net margin of -51.71%. Avis Budget Group's return on equity of -- beat Hertz Global Holdings's return on equity of -114.43%.

Avis Budget Group has a consensus price target of $171.88, signalling upside risk potential of 51.74%. On the other hand Hertz Global Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $8.57 which suggests that it could fall by -0.2%. Given that Avis Budget Group has higher upside potential than Hertz Global Holdings, analysts believe Avis Budget Group is more attractive than Hertz Global Holdings.

Avis Budget Group has a beta of 2.201, which suggesting that the stock is 120.09% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Hertz Global Holdings has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Avis Budget Group has a quarterly dividend of $10.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Hertz Global Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Avis Budget Group pays 21.75% of its earnings as a dividend. Hertz Global Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Avis Budget Group's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Avis Budget Group quarterly revenues are $3.4B, which are larger than Hertz Global Holdings quarterly revenues of $2.6B. Avis Budget Group's net income of $237M is higher than Hertz Global Holdings's net income of -$1.3B. Notably, Avis Budget Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 7.43x while Hertz Global Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Avis Budget Group is 0.25x versus 0.12x for Hertz Global Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Ryder System has a net margin of 6.89% compared to Avis Budget Group's net margin of 4.46%. Avis Budget Group's return on equity of -- beat Ryder System's return on equity of 15.55%.

Avis Budget Group has a consensus price target of $171.88, signalling upside risk potential of 51.74%. On the other hand Ryder System has an analysts' consensus of $168.70 which suggests that it could grow by 6.73%. Given that Avis Budget Group has higher upside potential than Ryder System, analysts believe Avis Budget Group is more attractive than Ryder System.

Avis Budget Group has a beta of 2.201, which suggesting that the stock is 120.09% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Ryder System has a beta of 1.298, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 29.778%.

Avis Budget Group has a quarterly dividend of $10.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Ryder System offers a yield of 1.92% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.81 per share. Avis Budget Group pays 21.75% of its earnings as a dividend. Ryder System pays out 31.53% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Avis Budget Group quarterly revenues are $3.4B, which are larger than Ryder System quarterly revenues of $3.2B. Avis Budget Group's net income of $237M is higher than Ryder System's net income of $142M. Notably, Avis Budget Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 7.43x while Ryder System's PE ratio is 14.79x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Avis Budget Group is 0.25x versus 0.56x for Ryder System. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

U-Haul Holding has a net margin of 6.89% compared to Avis Budget Group's net margin of 11.27%. Avis Budget Group's return on equity of -- beat U-Haul Holding's return on equity of 6.65%.

Avis Budget Group has a consensus price target of $171.88, signalling upside risk potential of 51.74%. On the other hand U-Haul Holding has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 40.09%. Given that Avis Budget Group has higher upside potential than U-Haul Holding, analysts believe Avis Budget Group is more attractive than U-Haul Holding.

Avis Budget Group has a beta of 2.201, which suggesting that the stock is 120.09% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison U-Haul Holding has a beta of 1.091, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 9.09%.

Avis Budget Group has a quarterly dividend of $10.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. U-Haul Holding offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Avis Budget Group pays 21.75% of its earnings as a dividend. U-Haul Holding pays out 5.05% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Avis Budget Group quarterly revenues are $3.4B, which are larger than U-Haul Holding quarterly revenues of $1.7B. Avis Budget Group's net income of $237M is higher than U-Haul Holding's net income of $186.8M. Notably, Avis Budget Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 7.43x while U-Haul Holding's PE ratio is 30.99x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Avis Budget Group is 0.25x versus 2.44x for U-Haul Holding. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.