Why Did David Tepper Sell NVIDIA Stock?
In Q1, billionaire David Tepper of Appaloosa Management sold nearly…
Buy
74
BHKLY Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$95.52
Seasonality move
:
1.64%
Day range:
$91.47 - $97.20
52-week range:
$55.74 - $97.20
Dividend yield:
5.38%
P/E ratio:
9.57x
P/S ratio:
5.09x
P/B ratio:
1.16x
Volume:
2.3K
Avg. volume:
4.4K
1-year change:
55.96%
Market cap:
$50.5B
Revenue:
$9.2B
EPS (TTM):
$9.28
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
BHKLY
BOC Hong Kong Holdings
|
$2.4B | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
FUTU
Futu Holdings
|
$592.9M | $1.94 | 24.73% | 47.13% | $146.01 |
|
MATH
Metalpha Technology Holding
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
MEGL
Magic Empire Global
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
TOP
TOP Financial Group
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
TROO
TROOPS
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
BHKLY
BOC Hong Kong Holdings
|
$95.52 | -- | $50.5B | 9.57x | $0.74 | 5.38% | 5.09x |
|
FUTU
Futu Holdings
|
$121.23 | $146.01 | $16.9B | 20.21x | $2.00 | 0% | 8.45x |
|
MATH
Metalpha Technology Holding
|
$2.96 | -- | $113.6M | 11.24x | $0.00 | 0% | 3.58x |
|
MEGL
Magic Empire Global
|
$1.58 | -- | $6.4M | -- | $0.01 | 0% | 4.88x |
|
TOP
TOP Financial Group
|
$1.24 | -- | $45.9M | 61.61x | $0.00 | 0% | 15.11x |
|
TROO
TROOPS
|
$0.68 | -- | $76.1M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 6.87x |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
BHKLY
BOC Hong Kong Holdings
|
18.85% | -1.213 | 29.53% | 4.60x |
|
FUTU
Futu Holdings
|
26.33% | 0.919 | 9.77% | 0.58x |
|
MATH
Metalpha Technology Holding
|
22.88% | 0.076 | 9.26% | 0.30x |
|
MEGL
Magic Empire Global
|
-- | 1.636 | -- | 56.19x |
|
TOP
TOP Financial Group
|
-- | 0.903 | -- | 3.64x |
|
TROO
TROOPS
|
18.45% | 5.158 | 6.4% | 2.30x |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
BHKLY
BOC Hong Kong Holdings
|
-- | -- | 9.33% | 11.52% | -- | -- |
|
FUTU
Futu Holdings
|
$507.1M | $345.1M | 19.05% | 23.51% | 57.2% | -- |
|
MATH
Metalpha Technology Holding
|
-- | -- | -27.01% | -30.78% | -- | -- |
|
MEGL
Magic Empire Global
|
-- | -- | -0.43% | -0.43% | -- | -- |
|
TOP
TOP Financial Group
|
-- | -- | 2.73% | 2.73% | -- | -- |
|
TROO
TROOPS
|
-- | -- | -3.12% | -3.38% | -- | -- |
BOC Hong Kong Holdings vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns BHKLY or FUTU?
Futu Holdings has a net margin of -- compared to BOC Hong Kong Holdings's net margin of 45.7%. BOC Hong Kong Holdings's return on equity of 11.52% beat Futu Holdings's return on equity of 23.51%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital BHKLYBOC Hong Kong Holdings-- -- $54.2B FUTUFutu Holdings84.05% $1.96 $5.3B -
What do Analysts Say About BHKLY or FUTU?
BOC Hong Kong Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Futu Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $146.01 which suggests that it could grow by 20.45%. Given that Futu Holdings has higher upside potential than BOC Hong Kong Holdings, analysts believe Futu Holdings is more attractive than BOC Hong Kong Holdings.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings BHKLYBOC Hong Kong Holdings0 0 0 FUTUFutu Holdings10 2 0 -
Is BHKLY or FUTU More Risky?
BOC Hong Kong Holdings has a beta of -0.077, which suggesting that the stock is 107.728% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Futu Holdings has a beta of 0.583, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 41.736%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock BHKLY or FUTU?
BOC Hong Kong Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.74 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.38%. Futu Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $2.00 per share. BOC Hong Kong Holdings pays 47.43% of its earnings as a dividend. Futu Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. BOC Hong Kong Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios BHKLY or FUTU?
BOC Hong Kong Holdings quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Futu Holdings quarterly revenues of $603.4M. BOC Hong Kong Holdings's net income of -- is lower than Futu Holdings's net income of $275.7M. Notably, BOC Hong Kong Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 9.57x while Futu Holdings's PE ratio is 20.21x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for BOC Hong Kong Holdings is 5.09x versus 8.45x for Futu Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income BHKLYBOC Hong Kong Holdings5.09x 9.57x -- -- FUTUFutu Holdings8.45x 20.21x $603.4M $275.7M
-
Which has Higher Returns BHKLY or MATH?
Metalpha Technology Holding has a net margin of -- compared to BOC Hong Kong Holdings's net margin of --. BOC Hong Kong Holdings's return on equity of 11.52% beat Metalpha Technology Holding's return on equity of -30.78%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital BHKLYBOC Hong Kong Holdings-- -- $54.2B MATHMetalpha Technology Holding-- -- $21.9M -
What do Analysts Say About BHKLY or MATH?
BOC Hong Kong Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Metalpha Technology Holding has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that BOC Hong Kong Holdings has higher upside potential than Metalpha Technology Holding, analysts believe BOC Hong Kong Holdings is more attractive than Metalpha Technology Holding.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings BHKLYBOC Hong Kong Holdings0 0 0 MATHMetalpha Technology Holding0 0 0 -
Is BHKLY or MATH More Risky?
BOC Hong Kong Holdings has a beta of -0.077, which suggesting that the stock is 107.728% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Metalpha Technology Holding has a beta of -0.990, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 199.004%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock BHKLY or MATH?
BOC Hong Kong Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.74 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.38%. Metalpha Technology Holding offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. BOC Hong Kong Holdings pays 47.43% of its earnings as a dividend. Metalpha Technology Holding pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. BOC Hong Kong Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios BHKLY or MATH?
BOC Hong Kong Holdings quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Metalpha Technology Holding quarterly revenues of --. BOC Hong Kong Holdings's net income of -- is lower than Metalpha Technology Holding's net income of --. Notably, BOC Hong Kong Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 9.57x while Metalpha Technology Holding's PE ratio is 11.24x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for BOC Hong Kong Holdings is 5.09x versus 3.58x for Metalpha Technology Holding. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income BHKLYBOC Hong Kong Holdings5.09x 9.57x -- -- MATHMetalpha Technology Holding3.58x 11.24x -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns BHKLY or MEGL?
Magic Empire Global has a net margin of -- compared to BOC Hong Kong Holdings's net margin of --. BOC Hong Kong Holdings's return on equity of 11.52% beat Magic Empire Global's return on equity of -0.43%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital BHKLYBOC Hong Kong Holdings-- -- $54.2B MEGLMagic Empire Global-- -- $17.3M -
What do Analysts Say About BHKLY or MEGL?
BOC Hong Kong Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Magic Empire Global has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that BOC Hong Kong Holdings has higher upside potential than Magic Empire Global, analysts believe BOC Hong Kong Holdings is more attractive than Magic Empire Global.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings BHKLYBOC Hong Kong Holdings0 0 0 MEGLMagic Empire Global0 0 0 -
Is BHKLY or MEGL More Risky?
BOC Hong Kong Holdings has a beta of -0.077, which suggesting that the stock is 107.728% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Magic Empire Global has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock BHKLY or MEGL?
BOC Hong Kong Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.74 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.38%. Magic Empire Global offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share. BOC Hong Kong Holdings pays 47.43% of its earnings as a dividend. Magic Empire Global pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. BOC Hong Kong Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios BHKLY or MEGL?
BOC Hong Kong Holdings quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Magic Empire Global quarterly revenues of --. BOC Hong Kong Holdings's net income of -- is lower than Magic Empire Global's net income of --. Notably, BOC Hong Kong Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 9.57x while Magic Empire Global's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for BOC Hong Kong Holdings is 5.09x versus 4.88x for Magic Empire Global. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income BHKLYBOC Hong Kong Holdings5.09x 9.57x -- -- MEGLMagic Empire Global4.88x -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns BHKLY or TOP?
TOP Financial Group has a net margin of -- compared to BOC Hong Kong Holdings's net margin of --. BOC Hong Kong Holdings's return on equity of 11.52% beat TOP Financial Group's return on equity of 2.73%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital BHKLYBOC Hong Kong Holdings-- -- $54.2B TOPTOP Financial Group-- -- $40.5M -
What do Analysts Say About BHKLY or TOP?
BOC Hong Kong Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand TOP Financial Group has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that BOC Hong Kong Holdings has higher upside potential than TOP Financial Group, analysts believe BOC Hong Kong Holdings is more attractive than TOP Financial Group.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings BHKLYBOC Hong Kong Holdings0 0 0 TOPTOP Financial Group0 0 0 -
Is BHKLY or TOP More Risky?
BOC Hong Kong Holdings has a beta of -0.077, which suggesting that the stock is 107.728% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison TOP Financial Group has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock BHKLY or TOP?
BOC Hong Kong Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.74 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.38%. TOP Financial Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. BOC Hong Kong Holdings pays 47.43% of its earnings as a dividend. TOP Financial Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. BOC Hong Kong Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios BHKLY or TOP?
BOC Hong Kong Holdings quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than TOP Financial Group quarterly revenues of --. BOC Hong Kong Holdings's net income of -- is lower than TOP Financial Group's net income of --. Notably, BOC Hong Kong Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 9.57x while TOP Financial Group's PE ratio is 61.61x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for BOC Hong Kong Holdings is 5.09x versus 15.11x for TOP Financial Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income BHKLYBOC Hong Kong Holdings5.09x 9.57x -- -- TOPTOP Financial Group15.11x 61.61x -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns BHKLY or TROO?
TROOPS has a net margin of -- compared to BOC Hong Kong Holdings's net margin of --. BOC Hong Kong Holdings's return on equity of 11.52% beat TROOPS's return on equity of -3.38%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital BHKLYBOC Hong Kong Holdings-- -- $54.2B TROOTROOPS-- -- $72.6M -
What do Analysts Say About BHKLY or TROO?
BOC Hong Kong Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand TROOPS has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that BOC Hong Kong Holdings has higher upside potential than TROOPS, analysts believe BOC Hong Kong Holdings is more attractive than TROOPS.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings BHKLYBOC Hong Kong Holdings0 0 0 TROOTROOPS0 0 0 -
Is BHKLY or TROO More Risky?
BOC Hong Kong Holdings has a beta of -0.077, which suggesting that the stock is 107.728% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison TROOPS has a beta of 2.606, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 160.553%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock BHKLY or TROO?
BOC Hong Kong Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.74 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.38%. TROOPS offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. BOC Hong Kong Holdings pays 47.43% of its earnings as a dividend. TROOPS pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. BOC Hong Kong Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios BHKLY or TROO?
BOC Hong Kong Holdings quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than TROOPS quarterly revenues of --. BOC Hong Kong Holdings's net income of -- is lower than TROOPS's net income of --. Notably, BOC Hong Kong Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 9.57x while TROOPS's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for BOC Hong Kong Holdings is 5.09x versus 6.87x for TROOPS. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income BHKLYBOC Hong Kong Holdings5.09x 9.57x -- -- TROOTROOPS6.87x -- -- --
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Why Is Planet Labs Stock Up Today?
Planet Labs (NYSE: PL) opened Friday trading with an unmistakable…
Is Coherent Stock Breaking Out?
Coherent (NYSE: COHR) has spent the better part of two years…
Stock Ideas
Buy
65
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.8T
P/E Ratio: 54x
Buy
67
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.7T
P/E Ratio: 42x
Sell
45
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3T
P/E Ratio: 33x
Alerts
Sell
49
NKE alert for Jun 28
Nike [NKE] is up 15.29% over the past day.
Buy
81
KTOS alert for Jun 28
Kratos Defense & Security Solutions [KTOS] is up 10.89% over the past day.
Sell
44
GDXU alert for Jun 28
MicroSectors Gold Miners 3X Leveraged ETN [GDXU] is down 10.89% over the past day.
