FUTU Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Metalpha Technology Holding has a net margin of 38.45% compared to Futu Holdings's net margin of --. Futu Holdings's return on equity of 17.23% beat Metalpha Technology Holding's return on equity of -30.78%.

Futu Holdings has a consensus price target of $83.90, signalling upside risk potential of 34.72%. On the other hand Metalpha Technology Holding has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Futu Holdings has higher upside potential than Metalpha Technology Holding, analysts believe Futu Holdings is more attractive than Metalpha Technology Holding.

Futu Holdings has a beta of 0.717, which suggesting that the stock is 28.28% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Metalpha Technology Holding has a beta of -0.825, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 182.528%.

Futu Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $2.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Metalpha Technology Holding offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Futu Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Metalpha Technology Holding pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Futu Holdings quarterly revenues are $440.5M, which are larger than Metalpha Technology Holding quarterly revenues of --. Futu Holdings's net income of $169.4M is higher than Metalpha Technology Holding's net income of --. Notably, Futu Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 21.35x while Metalpha Technology Holding's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Futu Holdings is 8.24x versus 2.05x for Metalpha Technology Holding. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Magic Empire Global has a net margin of 38.45% compared to Futu Holdings's net margin of --. Futu Holdings's return on equity of 17.23% beat Magic Empire Global's return on equity of -0.43%.

Futu Holdings has a consensus price target of $83.90, signalling upside risk potential of 34.72%. On the other hand Magic Empire Global has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Futu Holdings has higher upside potential than Magic Empire Global, analysts believe Futu Holdings is more attractive than Magic Empire Global.

Futu Holdings has a beta of 0.717, which suggesting that the stock is 28.28% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Magic Empire Global has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Futu Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $2.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Magic Empire Global offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share. Futu Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Magic Empire Global pays out -326.97% of its earnings as a dividend.

Futu Holdings quarterly revenues are $440.5M, which are larger than Magic Empire Global quarterly revenues of --. Futu Holdings's net income of $169.4M is higher than Magic Empire Global's net income of --. Notably, Futu Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 21.35x while Magic Empire Global's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Futu Holdings is 8.24x versus 4.82x for Magic Empire Global. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Prestige Wealth has a net margin of 38.45% compared to Futu Holdings's net margin of --. Futu Holdings's return on equity of 17.23% beat Prestige Wealth's return on equity of --.

Futu Holdings has a consensus price target of $83.90, signalling upside risk potential of 34.72%. On the other hand Prestige Wealth has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Futu Holdings has higher upside potential than Prestige Wealth, analysts believe Futu Holdings is more attractive than Prestige Wealth.

Futu Holdings has a beta of 0.717, which suggesting that the stock is 28.28% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Prestige Wealth has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Futu Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $2.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Prestige Wealth offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Futu Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Prestige Wealth pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Futu Holdings quarterly revenues are $440.5M, which are larger than Prestige Wealth quarterly revenues of --. Futu Holdings's net income of $169.4M is higher than Prestige Wealth's net income of --. Notably, Futu Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 21.35x while Prestige Wealth's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Futu Holdings is 8.24x versus -- for Prestige Wealth. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

TOP Financial Group has a net margin of 38.45% compared to Futu Holdings's net margin of --. Futu Holdings's return on equity of 17.23% beat TOP Financial Group's return on equity of 2.73%.

Futu Holdings has a consensus price target of $83.90, signalling upside risk potential of 34.72%. On the other hand TOP Financial Group has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Futu Holdings has higher upside potential than TOP Financial Group, analysts believe Futu Holdings is more attractive than TOP Financial Group.

Futu Holdings has a beta of 0.717, which suggesting that the stock is 28.28% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison TOP Financial Group has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Futu Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $2.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. TOP Financial Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Futu Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. TOP Financial Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Futu Holdings quarterly revenues are $440.5M, which are larger than TOP Financial Group quarterly revenues of --. Futu Holdings's net income of $169.4M is higher than TOP Financial Group's net income of --. Notably, Futu Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 21.35x while TOP Financial Group's PE ratio is 61.61x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Futu Holdings is 8.24x versus 6.23x for TOP Financial Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.