TROO Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Futu Holdings has a net margin of -- compared to TROOPS's net margin of 42.23%. TROOPS's return on equity of -3.38% beat Futu Holdings's return on equity of 20.37%.

TROOPS has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Futu Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $138.40 which suggests that it could grow by 29.49%. Given that Futu Holdings has higher upside potential than TROOPS, analysts believe Futu Holdings is more attractive than TROOPS.

TROOPS has a beta of 2.440, which suggesting that the stock is 144.036% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Futu Holdings has a beta of 0.672, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 32.772%.

TROOPS has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Futu Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $2.00 per share. TROOPS pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Futu Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

TROOPS quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Futu Holdings quarterly revenues of $570.1M. TROOPS's net income of -- is lower than Futu Holdings's net income of $240.7M. Notably, TROOPS's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Futu Holdings's PE ratio is 21.44x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for TROOPS is 7.00x versus 8.59x for Futu Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Metalpha Technology Holding has a net margin of -- compared to TROOPS's net margin of --. TROOPS's return on equity of -3.38% beat Metalpha Technology Holding's return on equity of -30.78%.

TROOPS has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Metalpha Technology Holding has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that TROOPS has higher upside potential than Metalpha Technology Holding, analysts believe TROOPS is more attractive than Metalpha Technology Holding.

TROOPS has a beta of 2.440, which suggesting that the stock is 144.036% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Metalpha Technology Holding has a beta of -1.244, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 224.417%.

TROOPS has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Metalpha Technology Holding offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. TROOPS pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Metalpha Technology Holding pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

TROOPS quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Metalpha Technology Holding quarterly revenues of --. TROOPS's net income of -- is lower than Metalpha Technology Holding's net income of --. Notably, TROOPS's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Metalpha Technology Holding's PE ratio is 11.24x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for TROOPS is 7.00x versus 3.41x for Metalpha Technology Holding. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Magic Empire Global has a net margin of -- compared to TROOPS's net margin of --. TROOPS's return on equity of -3.38% beat Magic Empire Global's return on equity of -0.43%.

TROOPS has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Magic Empire Global has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that TROOPS has higher upside potential than Magic Empire Global, analysts believe TROOPS is more attractive than Magic Empire Global.

TROOPS has a beta of 2.440, which suggesting that the stock is 144.036% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Magic Empire Global has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

TROOPS has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Magic Empire Global offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share. TROOPS pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Magic Empire Global pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

TROOPS quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Magic Empire Global quarterly revenues of --. TROOPS's net income of -- is lower than Magic Empire Global's net income of --. Notably, TROOPS's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Magic Empire Global's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for TROOPS is 7.00x versus 4.14x for Magic Empire Global. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

TOP Financial Group has a net margin of -- compared to TROOPS's net margin of --. TROOPS's return on equity of -3.38% beat TOP Financial Group's return on equity of 2.73%.

TROOPS has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand TOP Financial Group has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that TROOPS has higher upside potential than TOP Financial Group, analysts believe TROOPS is more attractive than TOP Financial Group.

TROOPS has a beta of 2.440, which suggesting that the stock is 144.036% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison TOP Financial Group has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

TROOPS has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. TOP Financial Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. TROOPS pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. TOP Financial Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

TROOPS quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than TOP Financial Group quarterly revenues of --. TROOPS's net income of -- is lower than TOP Financial Group's net income of --. Notably, TROOPS's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while TOP Financial Group's PE ratio is 61.61x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for TROOPS is 7.00x versus 15.54x for TOP Financial Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.