Will Tesla Go Up or Down in 2025?
The last few months have been exciting for Tesla and…
Sell
33
KBA Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$23.82
Seasonality move
:
-0.53%
Day range:
$23.79 - $23.87
52-week range:
$18.67 - $31.19
Dividend yield:
2.15%
P/E ratio:
--
P/S ratio:
--
P/B ratio:
--
Volume:
46K
Avg. volume:
136.7K
1-year change:
19.1%
Market cap:
--
Revenue:
--
EPS (TTM):
--
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
KBA
KraneShares Bosera MSCI China A 50 Connect Idx ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CXSE
WisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises Fund
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
FLCH
Franklin FTSE China ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
GXC
SPDR S&P China ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
PGJ
Invesco Golden Dragon China ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
KBA
KraneShares Bosera MSCI China A 50 Connect Idx ETF
|
$23.82 | -- | -- | -- | $0.51 | 2.15% | -- |
|
CXSE
WisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises Fund
|
$30.39 | -- | -- | -- | $0.09 | 1.68% | -- |
|
FLCH
Franklin FTSE China ETF
|
$18.75 | -- | -- | -- | $0.41 | 2.82% | -- |
|
GXC
SPDR S&P China ETF
|
$77.07 | -- | -- | -- | $1.50 | 2.76% | -- |
|
PGJ
Invesco Golden Dragon China ETF
|
$26.58 | -- | -- | -- | $0.07 | 4.63% | -- |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
KBA
KraneShares Bosera MSCI China A 50 Connect Idx ETF
|
-- | 0.988 | -- | -- |
|
CXSE
WisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises Fund
|
-- | 1.276 | -- | -- |
|
FLCH
Franklin FTSE China ETF
|
-- | 1.014 | -- | -- |
|
GXC
SPDR S&P China ETF
|
-- | 1.002 | -- | -- |
|
PGJ
Invesco Golden Dragon China ETF
|
-- | 1.607 | -- | -- |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
KBA
KraneShares Bosera MSCI China A 50 Connect Idx ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CXSE
WisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises Fund
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
FLCH
Franklin FTSE China ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
GXC
SPDR S&P China ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
PGJ
Invesco Golden Dragon China ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
KraneShares Bosera MSCI China A 50 Connect Idx ETF vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns KBA or CXSE?
WisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises Fund has a net margin of -- compared to KraneShares Bosera MSCI China A 50 Connect Idx ETF's net margin of --. KraneShares Bosera MSCI China A 50 Connect Idx ETF's return on equity of -- beat WisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises Fund's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital KBAKraneShares Bosera MSCI China A 50 Connect Idx ETF-- -- -- CXSEWisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises Fund-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About KBA or CXSE?
KraneShares Bosera MSCI China A 50 Connect Idx ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand WisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises Fund has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that KraneShares Bosera MSCI China A 50 Connect Idx ETF has higher upside potential than WisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises Fund, analysts believe KraneShares Bosera MSCI China A 50 Connect Idx ETF is more attractive than WisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises Fund.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings KBAKraneShares Bosera MSCI China A 50 Connect Idx ETF0 0 0 CXSEWisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises Fund0 0 0 -
Is KBA or CXSE More Risky?
KraneShares Bosera MSCI China A 50 Connect Idx ETF has a beta of 0.643, which suggesting that the stock is 35.657% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison WisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises Fund has a beta of 0.867, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 13.322%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock KBA or CXSE?
KraneShares Bosera MSCI China A 50 Connect Idx ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.51 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.15%. WisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises Fund offers a yield of 1.68% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.09 per share. KraneShares Bosera MSCI China A 50 Connect Idx ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. WisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises Fund pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios KBA or CXSE?
KraneShares Bosera MSCI China A 50 Connect Idx ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than WisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises Fund quarterly revenues of --. KraneShares Bosera MSCI China A 50 Connect Idx ETF's net income of -- is lower than WisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises Fund's net income of --. Notably, KraneShares Bosera MSCI China A 50 Connect Idx ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while WisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises Fund's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for KraneShares Bosera MSCI China A 50 Connect Idx ETF is -- versus -- for WisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises Fund. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income KBAKraneShares Bosera MSCI China A 50 Connect Idx ETF-- -- -- -- CXSEWisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises Fund-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns KBA or FLCH?
Franklin FTSE China ETF has a net margin of -- compared to KraneShares Bosera MSCI China A 50 Connect Idx ETF's net margin of --. KraneShares Bosera MSCI China A 50 Connect Idx ETF's return on equity of -- beat Franklin FTSE China ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital KBAKraneShares Bosera MSCI China A 50 Connect Idx ETF-- -- -- FLCHFranklin FTSE China ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About KBA or FLCH?
KraneShares Bosera MSCI China A 50 Connect Idx ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Franklin FTSE China ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that KraneShares Bosera MSCI China A 50 Connect Idx ETF has higher upside potential than Franklin FTSE China ETF, analysts believe KraneShares Bosera MSCI China A 50 Connect Idx ETF is more attractive than Franklin FTSE China ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings KBAKraneShares Bosera MSCI China A 50 Connect Idx ETF0 0 0 FLCHFranklin FTSE China ETF0 0 0 -
Is KBA or FLCH More Risky?
KraneShares Bosera MSCI China A 50 Connect Idx ETF has a beta of 0.643, which suggesting that the stock is 35.657% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Franklin FTSE China ETF has a beta of 0.814, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 18.601%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock KBA or FLCH?
KraneShares Bosera MSCI China A 50 Connect Idx ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.51 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.15%. Franklin FTSE China ETF offers a yield of 2.82% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.41 per share. KraneShares Bosera MSCI China A 50 Connect Idx ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Franklin FTSE China ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios KBA or FLCH?
KraneShares Bosera MSCI China A 50 Connect Idx ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Franklin FTSE China ETF quarterly revenues of --. KraneShares Bosera MSCI China A 50 Connect Idx ETF's net income of -- is lower than Franklin FTSE China ETF's net income of --. Notably, KraneShares Bosera MSCI China A 50 Connect Idx ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Franklin FTSE China ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for KraneShares Bosera MSCI China A 50 Connect Idx ETF is -- versus -- for Franklin FTSE China ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income KBAKraneShares Bosera MSCI China A 50 Connect Idx ETF-- -- -- -- FLCHFranklin FTSE China ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns KBA or GXC?
SPDR S&P China ETF has a net margin of -- compared to KraneShares Bosera MSCI China A 50 Connect Idx ETF's net margin of --. KraneShares Bosera MSCI China A 50 Connect Idx ETF's return on equity of -- beat SPDR S&P China ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital KBAKraneShares Bosera MSCI China A 50 Connect Idx ETF-- -- -- GXCSPDR S&P China ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About KBA or GXC?
KraneShares Bosera MSCI China A 50 Connect Idx ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand SPDR S&P China ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that KraneShares Bosera MSCI China A 50 Connect Idx ETF has higher upside potential than SPDR S&P China ETF, analysts believe KraneShares Bosera MSCI China A 50 Connect Idx ETF is more attractive than SPDR S&P China ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings KBAKraneShares Bosera MSCI China A 50 Connect Idx ETF0 0 0 GXCSPDR S&P China ETF0 0 0 -
Is KBA or GXC More Risky?
KraneShares Bosera MSCI China A 50 Connect Idx ETF has a beta of 0.643, which suggesting that the stock is 35.657% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison SPDR S&P China ETF has a beta of 0.802, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 19.751%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock KBA or GXC?
KraneShares Bosera MSCI China A 50 Connect Idx ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.51 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.15%. SPDR S&P China ETF offers a yield of 2.76% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.50 per share. KraneShares Bosera MSCI China A 50 Connect Idx ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. SPDR S&P China ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios KBA or GXC?
KraneShares Bosera MSCI China A 50 Connect Idx ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than SPDR S&P China ETF quarterly revenues of --. KraneShares Bosera MSCI China A 50 Connect Idx ETF's net income of -- is lower than SPDR S&P China ETF's net income of --. Notably, KraneShares Bosera MSCI China A 50 Connect Idx ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while SPDR S&P China ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for KraneShares Bosera MSCI China A 50 Connect Idx ETF is -- versus -- for SPDR S&P China ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income KBAKraneShares Bosera MSCI China A 50 Connect Idx ETF-- -- -- -- GXCSPDR S&P China ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns KBA or PGJ?
Invesco Golden Dragon China ETF has a net margin of -- compared to KraneShares Bosera MSCI China A 50 Connect Idx ETF's net margin of --. KraneShares Bosera MSCI China A 50 Connect Idx ETF's return on equity of -- beat Invesco Golden Dragon China ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital KBAKraneShares Bosera MSCI China A 50 Connect Idx ETF-- -- -- PGJInvesco Golden Dragon China ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About KBA or PGJ?
KraneShares Bosera MSCI China A 50 Connect Idx ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Invesco Golden Dragon China ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that KraneShares Bosera MSCI China A 50 Connect Idx ETF has higher upside potential than Invesco Golden Dragon China ETF, analysts believe KraneShares Bosera MSCI China A 50 Connect Idx ETF is more attractive than Invesco Golden Dragon China ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings KBAKraneShares Bosera MSCI China A 50 Connect Idx ETF0 0 0 PGJInvesco Golden Dragon China ETF0 0 0 -
Is KBA or PGJ More Risky?
KraneShares Bosera MSCI China A 50 Connect Idx ETF has a beta of 0.643, which suggesting that the stock is 35.657% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Invesco Golden Dragon China ETF has a beta of 1.061, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 6.144%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock KBA or PGJ?
KraneShares Bosera MSCI China A 50 Connect Idx ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.51 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.15%. Invesco Golden Dragon China ETF offers a yield of 4.63% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.07 per share. KraneShares Bosera MSCI China A 50 Connect Idx ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Invesco Golden Dragon China ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios KBA or PGJ?
KraneShares Bosera MSCI China A 50 Connect Idx ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Invesco Golden Dragon China ETF quarterly revenues of --. KraneShares Bosera MSCI China A 50 Connect Idx ETF's net income of -- is lower than Invesco Golden Dragon China ETF's net income of --. Notably, KraneShares Bosera MSCI China A 50 Connect Idx ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Invesco Golden Dragon China ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for KraneShares Bosera MSCI China A 50 Connect Idx ETF is -- versus -- for Invesco Golden Dragon China ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income KBAKraneShares Bosera MSCI China A 50 Connect Idx ETF-- -- -- -- PGJInvesco Golden Dragon China ETF-- -- -- --
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Why Is Coinbase Stock Going Down?
Every way you look at it, Coinbase has had a…
Is Uber Stock a Buy on the Dip?
Shares of Uber Technologies (NYSE:UBER) have been fading fast in…
Stock Ideas
Buy
64
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.9T
P/E Ratio: 42x
Buy
52
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.4T
P/E Ratio: 115x
Buy
54
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.2T
P/E Ratio: 36x
Alerts
Sell
50
LMND alert for Dec 28
Lemonade [LMND] is down 10.69% over the past day.
Sell
50
TSLL alert for Dec 28
Direxion Daily TSLA Bull 2X Shares [TSLL] is down 9.92% over the past day.
Buy
63
SMLR alert for Dec 28
Semler Scientific [SMLR] is down 9.65% over the past day.
