Why Is Coinbase Stock Going Down?
Every way you look at it, Coinbase has had a…
Sell
37
PGJ Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$26.56
Seasonality move
:
1.81%
Day range:
$26.39 - $26.65
52-week range:
$19.97 - $31.97
Dividend yield:
4.63%
P/E ratio:
--
P/S ratio:
--
P/B ratio:
--
Volume:
67.8K
Avg. volume:
68.4K
1-year change:
5.73%
Market cap:
--
Revenue:
--
EPS (TTM):
--
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
PGJ
Invesco Golden Dragon China ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CXSE
WisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises Fund
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
FLCH
Franklin FTSE China ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
GXC
SPDR S&P China ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
KBA
KraneShares Bosera MSCI China A 50 Connect Idx ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
PGJ
Invesco Golden Dragon China ETF
|
$26.58 | -- | -- | -- | $0.07 | 4.63% | -- |
|
CXSE
WisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises Fund
|
$30.39 | -- | -- | -- | $0.09 | 1.68% | -- |
|
FLCH
Franklin FTSE China ETF
|
$18.75 | -- | -- | -- | $0.41 | 2.82% | -- |
|
GXC
SPDR S&P China ETF
|
$77.07 | -- | -- | -- | $1.50 | 2.76% | -- |
|
KBA
KraneShares Bosera MSCI China A 50 Connect Idx ETF
|
$23.82 | -- | -- | -- | $0.51 | 2.15% | -- |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
PGJ
Invesco Golden Dragon China ETF
|
-- | 1.607 | -- | -- |
|
CXSE
WisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises Fund
|
-- | 1.276 | -- | -- |
|
FLCH
Franklin FTSE China ETF
|
-- | 1.014 | -- | -- |
|
GXC
SPDR S&P China ETF
|
-- | 1.002 | -- | -- |
|
KBA
KraneShares Bosera MSCI China A 50 Connect Idx ETF
|
-- | 0.988 | -- | -- |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
PGJ
Invesco Golden Dragon China ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CXSE
WisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises Fund
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
FLCH
Franklin FTSE China ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
GXC
SPDR S&P China ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
KBA
KraneShares Bosera MSCI China A 50 Connect Idx ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
Invesco Golden Dragon China ETF vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns PGJ or CXSE?
WisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises Fund has a net margin of -- compared to Invesco Golden Dragon China ETF's net margin of --. Invesco Golden Dragon China ETF's return on equity of -- beat WisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises Fund's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital PGJInvesco Golden Dragon China ETF-- -- -- CXSEWisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises Fund-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About PGJ or CXSE?
Invesco Golden Dragon China ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand WisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises Fund has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Invesco Golden Dragon China ETF has higher upside potential than WisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises Fund, analysts believe Invesco Golden Dragon China ETF is more attractive than WisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises Fund.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings PGJInvesco Golden Dragon China ETF0 0 0 CXSEWisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises Fund0 0 0 -
Is PGJ or CXSE More Risky?
Invesco Golden Dragon China ETF has a beta of 1.061, which suggesting that the stock is 6.144% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison WisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises Fund has a beta of 0.867, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 13.322%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock PGJ or CXSE?
Invesco Golden Dragon China ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.07 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.63%. WisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises Fund offers a yield of 1.68% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.09 per share. Invesco Golden Dragon China ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. WisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises Fund pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios PGJ or CXSE?
Invesco Golden Dragon China ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than WisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises Fund quarterly revenues of --. Invesco Golden Dragon China ETF's net income of -- is lower than WisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises Fund's net income of --. Notably, Invesco Golden Dragon China ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while WisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises Fund's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Invesco Golden Dragon China ETF is -- versus -- for WisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises Fund. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income PGJInvesco Golden Dragon China ETF-- -- -- -- CXSEWisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises Fund-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns PGJ or FLCH?
Franklin FTSE China ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Invesco Golden Dragon China ETF's net margin of --. Invesco Golden Dragon China ETF's return on equity of -- beat Franklin FTSE China ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital PGJInvesco Golden Dragon China ETF-- -- -- FLCHFranklin FTSE China ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About PGJ or FLCH?
Invesco Golden Dragon China ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Franklin FTSE China ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Invesco Golden Dragon China ETF has higher upside potential than Franklin FTSE China ETF, analysts believe Invesco Golden Dragon China ETF is more attractive than Franklin FTSE China ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings PGJInvesco Golden Dragon China ETF0 0 0 FLCHFranklin FTSE China ETF0 0 0 -
Is PGJ or FLCH More Risky?
Invesco Golden Dragon China ETF has a beta of 1.061, which suggesting that the stock is 6.144% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Franklin FTSE China ETF has a beta of 0.814, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 18.601%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock PGJ or FLCH?
Invesco Golden Dragon China ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.07 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.63%. Franklin FTSE China ETF offers a yield of 2.82% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.41 per share. Invesco Golden Dragon China ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Franklin FTSE China ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios PGJ or FLCH?
Invesco Golden Dragon China ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Franklin FTSE China ETF quarterly revenues of --. Invesco Golden Dragon China ETF's net income of -- is lower than Franklin FTSE China ETF's net income of --. Notably, Invesco Golden Dragon China ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Franklin FTSE China ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Invesco Golden Dragon China ETF is -- versus -- for Franklin FTSE China ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income PGJInvesco Golden Dragon China ETF-- -- -- -- FLCHFranklin FTSE China ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns PGJ or GXC?
SPDR S&P China ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Invesco Golden Dragon China ETF's net margin of --. Invesco Golden Dragon China ETF's return on equity of -- beat SPDR S&P China ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital PGJInvesco Golden Dragon China ETF-- -- -- GXCSPDR S&P China ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About PGJ or GXC?
Invesco Golden Dragon China ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand SPDR S&P China ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Invesco Golden Dragon China ETF has higher upside potential than SPDR S&P China ETF, analysts believe Invesco Golden Dragon China ETF is more attractive than SPDR S&P China ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings PGJInvesco Golden Dragon China ETF0 0 0 GXCSPDR S&P China ETF0 0 0 -
Is PGJ or GXC More Risky?
Invesco Golden Dragon China ETF has a beta of 1.061, which suggesting that the stock is 6.144% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison SPDR S&P China ETF has a beta of 0.802, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 19.751%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock PGJ or GXC?
Invesco Golden Dragon China ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.07 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.63%. SPDR S&P China ETF offers a yield of 2.76% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.50 per share. Invesco Golden Dragon China ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. SPDR S&P China ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios PGJ or GXC?
Invesco Golden Dragon China ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than SPDR S&P China ETF quarterly revenues of --. Invesco Golden Dragon China ETF's net income of -- is lower than SPDR S&P China ETF's net income of --. Notably, Invesco Golden Dragon China ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while SPDR S&P China ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Invesco Golden Dragon China ETF is -- versus -- for SPDR S&P China ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income PGJInvesco Golden Dragon China ETF-- -- -- -- GXCSPDR S&P China ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns PGJ or KBA?
KraneShares Bosera MSCI China A 50 Connect Idx ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Invesco Golden Dragon China ETF's net margin of --. Invesco Golden Dragon China ETF's return on equity of -- beat KraneShares Bosera MSCI China A 50 Connect Idx ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital PGJInvesco Golden Dragon China ETF-- -- -- KBAKraneShares Bosera MSCI China A 50 Connect Idx ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About PGJ or KBA?
Invesco Golden Dragon China ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand KraneShares Bosera MSCI China A 50 Connect Idx ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Invesco Golden Dragon China ETF has higher upside potential than KraneShares Bosera MSCI China A 50 Connect Idx ETF, analysts believe Invesco Golden Dragon China ETF is more attractive than KraneShares Bosera MSCI China A 50 Connect Idx ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings PGJInvesco Golden Dragon China ETF0 0 0 KBAKraneShares Bosera MSCI China A 50 Connect Idx ETF0 0 0 -
Is PGJ or KBA More Risky?
Invesco Golden Dragon China ETF has a beta of 1.061, which suggesting that the stock is 6.144% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison KraneShares Bosera MSCI China A 50 Connect Idx ETF has a beta of 0.643, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 35.657%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock PGJ or KBA?
Invesco Golden Dragon China ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.07 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.63%. KraneShares Bosera MSCI China A 50 Connect Idx ETF offers a yield of 2.15% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.51 per share. Invesco Golden Dragon China ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. KraneShares Bosera MSCI China A 50 Connect Idx ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios PGJ or KBA?
Invesco Golden Dragon China ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than KraneShares Bosera MSCI China A 50 Connect Idx ETF quarterly revenues of --. Invesco Golden Dragon China ETF's net income of -- is lower than KraneShares Bosera MSCI China A 50 Connect Idx ETF's net income of --. Notably, Invesco Golden Dragon China ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while KraneShares Bosera MSCI China A 50 Connect Idx ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Invesco Golden Dragon China ETF is -- versus -- for KraneShares Bosera MSCI China A 50 Connect Idx ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income PGJInvesco Golden Dragon China ETF-- -- -- -- KBAKraneShares Bosera MSCI China A 50 Connect Idx ETF-- -- -- --
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Is Uber Stock a Buy on the Dip?
Shares of Uber Technologies (NYSE:UBER) have been fading fast in…
Is AMD Stock an All-Time Buy?
Advanced Micro Devices (NASDAQ:AMD) is a high-growth AI stock that…
Stock Ideas
Buy
64
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.9T
P/E Ratio: 42x
Buy
52
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.4T
P/E Ratio: 115x
Buy
54
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.2T
P/E Ratio: 36x
Alerts
Sell
50
LMND alert for Dec 28
Lemonade [LMND] is down 10.69% over the past day.
Sell
50
TSLL alert for Dec 28
Direxion Daily TSLA Bull 2X Shares [TSLL] is down 9.92% over the past day.
Buy
63
SMLR alert for Dec 28
Semler Scientific [SMLR] is down 9.65% over the past day.
