What Is The Long-term Outlook for AMC Stock?
Meme stock extraordinaire AMC Entertainment Holdings, Inc. (NYSE:AMC) has long…
Buy
51
GXC Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$87.72
Seasonality move
:
0.28%
Day range:
$87.70 - $88.21
52-week range:
$64.69 - $97.17
Dividend yield:
2.85%
P/E ratio:
--
P/S ratio:
--
P/B ratio:
--
Volume:
13.9K
Avg. volume:
16.1K
1-year change:
26.37%
Market cap:
--
Revenue:
--
EPS (TTM):
--
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
GXC
SPDR S&P China ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
ASHR
Xtrackers Hvst CSI 300 China A-Shs ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
ASHS
Xtrackers Hvst CSI500 China A-Shs SC ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
EWD
iShares MSCI Sweden ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
EWH
iShares MSCI Hong Kong ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
EWQ
iShares MSCI France ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
GXC
SPDR S&P China ETF
|
$87.82 | -- | -- | -- | $1.00 | 2.85% | -- |
|
ASHR
Xtrackers Hvst CSI 300 China A-Shs ETF
|
$27.69 | -- | -- | -- | $0.30 | 1.08% | -- |
|
ASHS
Xtrackers Hvst CSI500 China A-Shs SC ETF
|
$29.40 | -- | -- | -- | $0.19 | 0.65% | -- |
|
EWD
iShares MSCI Sweden ETF
|
$44.67 | -- | -- | -- | $1.01 | 2.26% | -- |
|
EWH
iShares MSCI Hong Kong ETF
|
$20.06 | -- | -- | -- | $0.42 | 3.8% | -- |
|
EWQ
iShares MSCI France ETF
|
$41.89 | -- | -- | -- | $0.95 | 2.93% | -- |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
GXC
SPDR S&P China ETF
|
-- | 0.728 | -- | -- |
|
ASHR
Xtrackers Hvst CSI 300 China A-Shs ETF
|
-- | 0.731 | -- | -- |
|
ASHS
Xtrackers Hvst CSI500 China A-Shs SC ETF
|
-- | 0.600 | -- | -- |
|
EWD
iShares MSCI Sweden ETF
|
-- | 1.580 | -- | -- |
|
EWH
iShares MSCI Hong Kong ETF
|
-- | 1.246 | -- | -- |
|
EWQ
iShares MSCI France ETF
|
-- | 1.249 | -- | -- |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
GXC
SPDR S&P China ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
ASHR
Xtrackers Hvst CSI 300 China A-Shs ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
ASHS
Xtrackers Hvst CSI500 China A-Shs SC ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
EWD
iShares MSCI Sweden ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
EWH
iShares MSCI Hong Kong ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
EWQ
iShares MSCI France ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
SPDR S&P China ETF vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns GXC or ASHR?
Xtrackers Hvst CSI 300 China A-Shs ETF has a net margin of -- compared to SPDR S&P China ETF's net margin of --. SPDR S&P China ETF's return on equity of -- beat Xtrackers Hvst CSI 300 China A-Shs ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital GXCSPDR S&P China ETF-- -- -- ASHRXtrackers Hvst CSI 300 China A-Shs ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About GXC or ASHR?
SPDR S&P China ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Xtrackers Hvst CSI 300 China A-Shs ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that SPDR S&P China ETF has higher upside potential than Xtrackers Hvst CSI 300 China A-Shs ETF, analysts believe SPDR S&P China ETF is more attractive than Xtrackers Hvst CSI 300 China A-Shs ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings GXCSPDR S&P China ETF0 0 0 ASHRXtrackers Hvst CSI 300 China A-Shs ETF0 0 0 -
Is GXC or ASHR More Risky?
SPDR S&P China ETF has a beta of 0.885, which suggesting that the stock is 11.477% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Xtrackers Hvst CSI 300 China A-Shs ETF has a beta of 0.737, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 26.33%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock GXC or ASHR?
SPDR S&P China ETF has a quarterly dividend of $1.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.85%. Xtrackers Hvst CSI 300 China A-Shs ETF offers a yield of 1.08% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share. SPDR S&P China ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Xtrackers Hvst CSI 300 China A-Shs ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios GXC or ASHR?
SPDR S&P China ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Xtrackers Hvst CSI 300 China A-Shs ETF quarterly revenues of --. SPDR S&P China ETF's net income of -- is lower than Xtrackers Hvst CSI 300 China A-Shs ETF's net income of --. Notably, SPDR S&P China ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Xtrackers Hvst CSI 300 China A-Shs ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for SPDR S&P China ETF is -- versus -- for Xtrackers Hvst CSI 300 China A-Shs ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income GXCSPDR S&P China ETF-- -- -- -- ASHRXtrackers Hvst CSI 300 China A-Shs ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns GXC or ASHS?
Xtrackers Hvst CSI500 China A-Shs SC ETF has a net margin of -- compared to SPDR S&P China ETF's net margin of --. SPDR S&P China ETF's return on equity of -- beat Xtrackers Hvst CSI500 China A-Shs SC ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital GXCSPDR S&P China ETF-- -- -- ASHSXtrackers Hvst CSI500 China A-Shs SC ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About GXC or ASHS?
SPDR S&P China ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Xtrackers Hvst CSI500 China A-Shs SC ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that SPDR S&P China ETF has higher upside potential than Xtrackers Hvst CSI500 China A-Shs SC ETF, analysts believe SPDR S&P China ETF is more attractive than Xtrackers Hvst CSI500 China A-Shs SC ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings GXCSPDR S&P China ETF0 0 0 ASHSXtrackers Hvst CSI500 China A-Shs SC ETF0 0 0 -
Is GXC or ASHS More Risky?
SPDR S&P China ETF has a beta of 0.885, which suggesting that the stock is 11.477% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Xtrackers Hvst CSI500 China A-Shs SC ETF has a beta of 0.683, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 31.661%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock GXC or ASHS?
SPDR S&P China ETF has a quarterly dividend of $1.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.85%. Xtrackers Hvst CSI500 China A-Shs SC ETF offers a yield of 0.65% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.19 per share. SPDR S&P China ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Xtrackers Hvst CSI500 China A-Shs SC ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios GXC or ASHS?
SPDR S&P China ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Xtrackers Hvst CSI500 China A-Shs SC ETF quarterly revenues of --. SPDR S&P China ETF's net income of -- is lower than Xtrackers Hvst CSI500 China A-Shs SC ETF's net income of --. Notably, SPDR S&P China ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Xtrackers Hvst CSI500 China A-Shs SC ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for SPDR S&P China ETF is -- versus -- for Xtrackers Hvst CSI500 China A-Shs SC ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income GXCSPDR S&P China ETF-- -- -- -- ASHSXtrackers Hvst CSI500 China A-Shs SC ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns GXC or EWD?
iShares MSCI Sweden ETF has a net margin of -- compared to SPDR S&P China ETF's net margin of --. SPDR S&P China ETF's return on equity of -- beat iShares MSCI Sweden ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital GXCSPDR S&P China ETF-- -- -- EWDiShares MSCI Sweden ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About GXC or EWD?
SPDR S&P China ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand iShares MSCI Sweden ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that SPDR S&P China ETF has higher upside potential than iShares MSCI Sweden ETF, analysts believe SPDR S&P China ETF is more attractive than iShares MSCI Sweden ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings GXCSPDR S&P China ETF0 0 0 EWDiShares MSCI Sweden ETF0 0 0 -
Is GXC or EWD More Risky?
SPDR S&P China ETF has a beta of 0.885, which suggesting that the stock is 11.477% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison iShares MSCI Sweden ETF has a beta of 1.340, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 33.958%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock GXC or EWD?
SPDR S&P China ETF has a quarterly dividend of $1.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.85%. iShares MSCI Sweden ETF offers a yield of 2.26% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.01 per share. SPDR S&P China ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. iShares MSCI Sweden ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios GXC or EWD?
SPDR S&P China ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than iShares MSCI Sweden ETF quarterly revenues of --. SPDR S&P China ETF's net income of -- is lower than iShares MSCI Sweden ETF's net income of --. Notably, SPDR S&P China ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while iShares MSCI Sweden ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for SPDR S&P China ETF is -- versus -- for iShares MSCI Sweden ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income GXCSPDR S&P China ETF-- -- -- -- EWDiShares MSCI Sweden ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns GXC or EWH?
iShares MSCI Hong Kong ETF has a net margin of -- compared to SPDR S&P China ETF's net margin of --. SPDR S&P China ETF's return on equity of -- beat iShares MSCI Hong Kong ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital GXCSPDR S&P China ETF-- -- -- EWHiShares MSCI Hong Kong ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About GXC or EWH?
SPDR S&P China ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand iShares MSCI Hong Kong ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that SPDR S&P China ETF has higher upside potential than iShares MSCI Hong Kong ETF, analysts believe SPDR S&P China ETF is more attractive than iShares MSCI Hong Kong ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings GXCSPDR S&P China ETF0 0 0 EWHiShares MSCI Hong Kong ETF0 0 0 -
Is GXC or EWH More Risky?
SPDR S&P China ETF has a beta of 0.885, which suggesting that the stock is 11.477% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison iShares MSCI Hong Kong ETF has a beta of 0.938, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 6.188%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock GXC or EWH?
SPDR S&P China ETF has a quarterly dividend of $1.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.85%. iShares MSCI Hong Kong ETF offers a yield of 3.8% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.42 per share. SPDR S&P China ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. iShares MSCI Hong Kong ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios GXC or EWH?
SPDR S&P China ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than iShares MSCI Hong Kong ETF quarterly revenues of --. SPDR S&P China ETF's net income of -- is lower than iShares MSCI Hong Kong ETF's net income of --. Notably, SPDR S&P China ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while iShares MSCI Hong Kong ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for SPDR S&P China ETF is -- versus -- for iShares MSCI Hong Kong ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income GXCSPDR S&P China ETF-- -- -- -- EWHiShares MSCI Hong Kong ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns GXC or EWQ?
iShares MSCI France ETF has a net margin of -- compared to SPDR S&P China ETF's net margin of --. SPDR S&P China ETF's return on equity of -- beat iShares MSCI France ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital GXCSPDR S&P China ETF-- -- -- EWQiShares MSCI France ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About GXC or EWQ?
SPDR S&P China ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand iShares MSCI France ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that SPDR S&P China ETF has higher upside potential than iShares MSCI France ETF, analysts believe SPDR S&P China ETF is more attractive than iShares MSCI France ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings GXCSPDR S&P China ETF0 0 0 EWQiShares MSCI France ETF0 0 0 -
Is GXC or EWQ More Risky?
SPDR S&P China ETF has a beta of 0.885, which suggesting that the stock is 11.477% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison iShares MSCI France ETF has a beta of 1.237, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 23.723%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock GXC or EWQ?
SPDR S&P China ETF has a quarterly dividend of $1.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.85%. iShares MSCI France ETF offers a yield of 2.93% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.95 per share. SPDR S&P China ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. iShares MSCI France ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios GXC or EWQ?
SPDR S&P China ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than iShares MSCI France ETF quarterly revenues of --. SPDR S&P China ETF's net income of -- is lower than iShares MSCI France ETF's net income of --. Notably, SPDR S&P China ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while iShares MSCI France ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for SPDR S&P China ETF is -- versus -- for iShares MSCI France ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income GXCSPDR S&P China ETF-- -- -- -- EWQiShares MSCI France ETF-- -- -- --
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Is NuScale the Best Nuclear Stock to Buy?
NuScale Power (NYSE:SMR) is a nuclear power startup that has…
Where Will Kestra Medical Stock Be in 1 Year?
Kestra Medical Technologies (NASDAQ:KMTS) is a medical device startup that…
Stock Ideas
Buy
65
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.8T
P/E Ratio: 52x
Buy
67
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.7T
P/E Ratio: 42x
Sell
46
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3T
P/E Ratio: 33x
Alerts
Buy
76
AVAV alert for Jun 26
AeroVironment [AVAV] is up 21.6% over the past day.
Buy
51
SITM alert for Jun 26
SiTime [SITM] is down 15.62% over the past day.
Buy
54
NGVC alert for Jun 26
Natural Grocers by Vitamin Cottage [NGVC] is down 12.33% over the past day.
