ZWS Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

LanzaTech Global has a net margin of 10.61% compared to Zurn Elkay Water Solutions's net margin of -577.6%. Zurn Elkay Water Solutions's return on equity of 8.6% beat LanzaTech Global's return on equity of -155.58%.

Zurn Elkay Water Solutions has a consensus price target of $35.29, signalling upside risk potential of 4.25%. On the other hand LanzaTech Global has an analysts' consensus of $3.75 which suggests that it could grow by 134.38%. Given that LanzaTech Global has higher upside potential than Zurn Elkay Water Solutions, analysts believe LanzaTech Global is more attractive than Zurn Elkay Water Solutions.

Zurn Elkay Water Solutions has a beta of 1.158, which suggesting that the stock is 15.793% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison LanzaTech Global has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Zurn Elkay Water Solutions has a quarterly dividend of $0.09 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.87%. LanzaTech Global offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Zurn Elkay Water Solutions pays 44.72% of its earnings as a dividend. LanzaTech Global pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Zurn Elkay Water Solutions's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Zurn Elkay Water Solutions quarterly revenues are $410M, which are larger than LanzaTech Global quarterly revenues of $9.9M. Zurn Elkay Water Solutions's net income of $43.5M is higher than LanzaTech Global's net income of -$57.4M. Notably, Zurn Elkay Water Solutions's price-to-earnings ratio is 47.87x while LanzaTech Global's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Zurn Elkay Water Solutions is 4.27x versus 5.43x for LanzaTech Global. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Perma-Fix Environmental Services has a net margin of 10.61% compared to Zurn Elkay Water Solutions's net margin of -53.41%. Zurn Elkay Water Solutions's return on equity of 8.6% beat Perma-Fix Environmental Services's return on equity of -39.49%.

Zurn Elkay Water Solutions has a consensus price target of $35.29, signalling upside risk potential of 4.25%. On the other hand Perma-Fix Environmental Services has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 107.74%. Given that Perma-Fix Environmental Services has higher upside potential than Zurn Elkay Water Solutions, analysts believe Perma-Fix Environmental Services is more attractive than Zurn Elkay Water Solutions.

Zurn Elkay Water Solutions has a beta of 1.158, which suggesting that the stock is 15.793% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Perma-Fix Environmental Services has a beta of 0.419, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 58.12%.

Zurn Elkay Water Solutions has a quarterly dividend of $0.09 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.87%. Perma-Fix Environmental Services offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Zurn Elkay Water Solutions pays 44.72% of its earnings as a dividend. Perma-Fix Environmental Services pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Zurn Elkay Water Solutions's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Zurn Elkay Water Solutions quarterly revenues are $410M, which are larger than Perma-Fix Environmental Services quarterly revenues of $16.8M. Zurn Elkay Water Solutions's net income of $43.5M is higher than Perma-Fix Environmental Services's net income of -$9M. Notably, Zurn Elkay Water Solutions's price-to-earnings ratio is 47.87x while Perma-Fix Environmental Services's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Zurn Elkay Water Solutions is 4.27x versus 2.28x for Perma-Fix Environmental Services. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Spectaire Holdings has a net margin of 10.61% compared to Zurn Elkay Water Solutions's net margin of --. Zurn Elkay Water Solutions's return on equity of 8.6% beat Spectaire Holdings's return on equity of --.

Zurn Elkay Water Solutions has a consensus price target of $35.29, signalling upside risk potential of 4.25%. On the other hand Spectaire Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 10029.43%. Given that Spectaire Holdings has higher upside potential than Zurn Elkay Water Solutions, analysts believe Spectaire Holdings is more attractive than Zurn Elkay Water Solutions.

Zurn Elkay Water Solutions has a beta of 1.158, which suggesting that the stock is 15.793% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Spectaire Holdings has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Zurn Elkay Water Solutions has a quarterly dividend of $0.09 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.87%. Spectaire Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Zurn Elkay Water Solutions pays 44.72% of its earnings as a dividend. Spectaire Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Zurn Elkay Water Solutions's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Zurn Elkay Water Solutions quarterly revenues are $410M, which are larger than Spectaire Holdings quarterly revenues of --. Zurn Elkay Water Solutions's net income of $43.5M is higher than Spectaire Holdings's net income of $4.5M. Notably, Zurn Elkay Water Solutions's price-to-earnings ratio is 47.87x while Spectaire Holdings's PE ratio is 0.02x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Zurn Elkay Water Solutions is 4.27x versus -- for Spectaire Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Titan Environmental Solutions has a net margin of 10.61% compared to Zurn Elkay Water Solutions's net margin of -349.06%. Zurn Elkay Water Solutions's return on equity of 8.6% beat Titan Environmental Solutions's return on equity of -443.56%.

Zurn Elkay Water Solutions has a consensus price target of $35.29, signalling upside risk potential of 4.25%. On the other hand Titan Environmental Solutions has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Zurn Elkay Water Solutions has higher upside potential than Titan Environmental Solutions, analysts believe Zurn Elkay Water Solutions is more attractive than Titan Environmental Solutions.

Zurn Elkay Water Solutions has a beta of 1.158, which suggesting that the stock is 15.793% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Titan Environmental Solutions has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Zurn Elkay Water Solutions has a quarterly dividend of $0.09 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.87%. Titan Environmental Solutions offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Zurn Elkay Water Solutions pays 44.72% of its earnings as a dividend. Titan Environmental Solutions pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Zurn Elkay Water Solutions's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Zurn Elkay Water Solutions quarterly revenues are $410M, which are larger than Titan Environmental Solutions quarterly revenues of $3.9M. Zurn Elkay Water Solutions's net income of $43.5M is higher than Titan Environmental Solutions's net income of -$13.6M. Notably, Zurn Elkay Water Solutions's price-to-earnings ratio is 47.87x while Titan Environmental Solutions's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Zurn Elkay Water Solutions is 4.27x versus 3.29x for Titan Environmental Solutions. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.