PCT Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Casella Waste Systems has a net margin of -- compared to PureCycle Technologies's net margin of -1.15%. PureCycle Technologies's return on equity of -- beat Casella Waste Systems's return on equity of 0.96%.

PureCycle Technologies has a consensus price target of $14.33, signalling downside risk potential of -8.65%. On the other hand Casella Waste Systems has an analysts' consensus of $127.01 which suggests that it could grow by 13.45%. Given that Casella Waste Systems has higher upside potential than PureCycle Technologies, analysts believe Casella Waste Systems is more attractive than PureCycle Technologies.

PureCycle Technologies has a beta of 1.904, which suggesting that the stock is 90.371% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Casella Waste Systems has a beta of 0.837, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 16.285%.

PureCycle Technologies has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Casella Waste Systems offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. PureCycle Technologies pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Casella Waste Systems pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

PureCycle Technologies quarterly revenues are $1.6M, which are smaller than Casella Waste Systems quarterly revenues of $417.1M. PureCycle Technologies's net income of $8.8M is higher than Casella Waste Systems's net income of -$4.8M. Notably, PureCycle Technologies's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Casella Waste Systems's PE ratio is 508.91x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for PureCycle Technologies is -- versus 4.18x for Casella Waste Systems. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

LanzaTech Global has a net margin of -- compared to PureCycle Technologies's net margin of -202.77%. PureCycle Technologies's return on equity of -- beat LanzaTech Global's return on equity of -354.84%.

PureCycle Technologies has a consensus price target of $14.33, signalling downside risk potential of -8.65%. On the other hand LanzaTech Global has an analysts' consensus of $1.35 which suggests that it could grow by 359.34%. Given that LanzaTech Global has higher upside potential than PureCycle Technologies, analysts believe LanzaTech Global is more attractive than PureCycle Technologies.

PureCycle Technologies has a beta of 1.904, which suggesting that the stock is 90.371% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison LanzaTech Global has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

PureCycle Technologies has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. LanzaTech Global offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. PureCycle Technologies pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. LanzaTech Global pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

PureCycle Technologies quarterly revenues are $1.6M, which are smaller than LanzaTech Global quarterly revenues of $9.5M. PureCycle Technologies's net income of $8.8M is higher than LanzaTech Global's net income of -$19.2M. Notably, PureCycle Technologies's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while LanzaTech Global's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for PureCycle Technologies is -- versus 1.19x for LanzaTech Global. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Perma-Fix Environmental Services has a net margin of -- compared to PureCycle Technologies's net margin of -25.67%. PureCycle Technologies's return on equity of -- beat Perma-Fix Environmental Services's return on equity of -39.8%.

PureCycle Technologies has a consensus price target of $14.33, signalling downside risk potential of -8.65%. On the other hand Perma-Fix Environmental Services has an analysts' consensus of $18.00 which suggests that it could grow by 59.01%. Given that Perma-Fix Environmental Services has higher upside potential than PureCycle Technologies, analysts believe Perma-Fix Environmental Services is more attractive than PureCycle Technologies.

PureCycle Technologies has a beta of 1.904, which suggesting that the stock is 90.371% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Perma-Fix Environmental Services has a beta of 0.285, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 71.538%.

PureCycle Technologies has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Perma-Fix Environmental Services offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. PureCycle Technologies pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Perma-Fix Environmental Services pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

PureCycle Technologies quarterly revenues are $1.6M, which are smaller than Perma-Fix Environmental Services quarterly revenues of $13.9M. PureCycle Technologies's net income of $8.8M is higher than Perma-Fix Environmental Services's net income of -$3.6M. Notably, PureCycle Technologies's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Perma-Fix Environmental Services's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for PureCycle Technologies is -- versus 3.10x for Perma-Fix Environmental Services. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Republic Services has a net margin of -- compared to PureCycle Technologies's net margin of 12.35%. PureCycle Technologies's return on equity of -- beat Republic Services's return on equity of 18.57%.

PureCycle Technologies has a consensus price target of $14.33, signalling downside risk potential of -8.65%. On the other hand Republic Services has an analysts' consensus of $259.29 which suggests that it could grow by 6.19%. Given that Republic Services has higher upside potential than PureCycle Technologies, analysts believe Republic Services is more attractive than PureCycle Technologies.

PureCycle Technologies has a beta of 1.904, which suggesting that the stock is 90.371% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Republic Services has a beta of 0.610, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 38.966%.

PureCycle Technologies has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Republic Services offers a yield of 0.95% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.58 per share. PureCycle Technologies pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Republic Services pays out 33.63% of its earnings as a dividend. Republic Services's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

PureCycle Technologies quarterly revenues are $1.6M, which are smaller than Republic Services quarterly revenues of $4B. PureCycle Technologies's net income of $8.8M is lower than Republic Services's net income of $495M. Notably, PureCycle Technologies's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Republic Services's PE ratio is 36.83x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for PureCycle Technologies is -- versus 4.74x for Republic Services. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.