PESI Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

LanzaTech Global has a net margin of -53.41% compared to Perma-Fix Environmental Services's net margin of -577.6%. Perma-Fix Environmental Services's return on equity of -39.49% beat LanzaTech Global's return on equity of -155.58%.

Perma-Fix Environmental Services has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 107.74%. On the other hand LanzaTech Global has an analysts' consensus of $3.75 which suggests that it could grow by 134.38%. Given that LanzaTech Global has higher upside potential than Perma-Fix Environmental Services, analysts believe LanzaTech Global is more attractive than Perma-Fix Environmental Services.

Perma-Fix Environmental Services has a beta of 0.419, which suggesting that the stock is 58.12% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison LanzaTech Global has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Perma-Fix Environmental Services has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. LanzaTech Global offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Perma-Fix Environmental Services pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. LanzaTech Global pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Perma-Fix Environmental Services quarterly revenues are $16.8M, which are larger than LanzaTech Global quarterly revenues of $9.9M. Perma-Fix Environmental Services's net income of -$9M is higher than LanzaTech Global's net income of -$57.4M. Notably, Perma-Fix Environmental Services's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while LanzaTech Global's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Perma-Fix Environmental Services is 2.28x versus 5.43x for LanzaTech Global. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Spectaire Holdings has a net margin of -53.41% compared to Perma-Fix Environmental Services's net margin of --. Perma-Fix Environmental Services's return on equity of -39.49% beat Spectaire Holdings's return on equity of --.

Perma-Fix Environmental Services has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 107.74%. On the other hand Spectaire Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 10029.43%. Given that Spectaire Holdings has higher upside potential than Perma-Fix Environmental Services, analysts believe Spectaire Holdings is more attractive than Perma-Fix Environmental Services.

Perma-Fix Environmental Services has a beta of 0.419, which suggesting that the stock is 58.12% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Spectaire Holdings has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Perma-Fix Environmental Services has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Spectaire Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Perma-Fix Environmental Services pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Spectaire Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Perma-Fix Environmental Services quarterly revenues are $16.8M, which are larger than Spectaire Holdings quarterly revenues of --. Perma-Fix Environmental Services's net income of -$9M is lower than Spectaire Holdings's net income of $4.5M. Notably, Perma-Fix Environmental Services's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Spectaire Holdings's PE ratio is 0.02x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Perma-Fix Environmental Services is 2.28x versus -- for Spectaire Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Titan Environmental Solutions has a net margin of -53.41% compared to Perma-Fix Environmental Services's net margin of -349.06%. Perma-Fix Environmental Services's return on equity of -39.49% beat Titan Environmental Solutions's return on equity of -443.56%.

Perma-Fix Environmental Services has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 107.74%. On the other hand Titan Environmental Solutions has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Perma-Fix Environmental Services has higher upside potential than Titan Environmental Solutions, analysts believe Perma-Fix Environmental Services is more attractive than Titan Environmental Solutions.

Perma-Fix Environmental Services has a beta of 0.419, which suggesting that the stock is 58.12% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Titan Environmental Solutions has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Perma-Fix Environmental Services has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Titan Environmental Solutions offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Perma-Fix Environmental Services pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Titan Environmental Solutions pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Perma-Fix Environmental Services quarterly revenues are $16.8M, which are larger than Titan Environmental Solutions quarterly revenues of $3.9M. Perma-Fix Environmental Services's net income of -$9M is higher than Titan Environmental Solutions's net income of -$13.6M. Notably, Perma-Fix Environmental Services's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Titan Environmental Solutions's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Perma-Fix Environmental Services is 2.28x versus 3.29x for Titan Environmental Solutions. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Zurn Elkay Water Solutions has a net margin of -53.41% compared to Perma-Fix Environmental Services's net margin of 10.61%. Perma-Fix Environmental Services's return on equity of -39.49% beat Zurn Elkay Water Solutions's return on equity of 8.6%.

Perma-Fix Environmental Services has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 107.74%. On the other hand Zurn Elkay Water Solutions has an analysts' consensus of $35.29 which suggests that it could grow by 4.25%. Given that Perma-Fix Environmental Services has higher upside potential than Zurn Elkay Water Solutions, analysts believe Perma-Fix Environmental Services is more attractive than Zurn Elkay Water Solutions.

Perma-Fix Environmental Services has a beta of 0.419, which suggesting that the stock is 58.12% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Zurn Elkay Water Solutions has a beta of 1.158, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 15.793%.

Perma-Fix Environmental Services has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Zurn Elkay Water Solutions offers a yield of 0.87% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.09 per share. Perma-Fix Environmental Services pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Zurn Elkay Water Solutions pays out 44.72% of its earnings as a dividend. Zurn Elkay Water Solutions's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Perma-Fix Environmental Services quarterly revenues are $16.8M, which are smaller than Zurn Elkay Water Solutions quarterly revenues of $410M. Perma-Fix Environmental Services's net income of -$9M is lower than Zurn Elkay Water Solutions's net income of $43.5M. Notably, Perma-Fix Environmental Services's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Zurn Elkay Water Solutions's PE ratio is 47.87x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Perma-Fix Environmental Services is 2.28x versus 4.27x for Zurn Elkay Water Solutions. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.