PESI Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

LanzaTech Global has a net margin of -25.67% compared to Perma-Fix Environmental Services's net margin of -202.77%. Perma-Fix Environmental Services's return on equity of -39.8% beat LanzaTech Global's return on equity of -354.84%.

Perma-Fix Environmental Services has a consensus price target of $18.00, signalling upside risk potential of 66.21%. On the other hand LanzaTech Global has an analysts' consensus of $1.35 which suggests that it could grow by 422.65%. Given that LanzaTech Global has higher upside potential than Perma-Fix Environmental Services, analysts believe LanzaTech Global is more attractive than Perma-Fix Environmental Services.

Perma-Fix Environmental Services has a beta of 0.178, which suggesting that the stock is 82.214% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison LanzaTech Global has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Perma-Fix Environmental Services has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. LanzaTech Global offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Perma-Fix Environmental Services pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. LanzaTech Global pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Perma-Fix Environmental Services quarterly revenues are $13.9M, which are larger than LanzaTech Global quarterly revenues of $9.5M. Perma-Fix Environmental Services's net income of -$3.6M is higher than LanzaTech Global's net income of -$19.2M. Notably, Perma-Fix Environmental Services's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while LanzaTech Global's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Perma-Fix Environmental Services is 2.96x versus 1.04x for LanzaTech Global. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Republic Services has a net margin of -25.67% compared to Perma-Fix Environmental Services's net margin of 12.35%. Perma-Fix Environmental Services's return on equity of -39.8% beat Republic Services's return on equity of 18.57%.

Perma-Fix Environmental Services has a consensus price target of $18.00, signalling upside risk potential of 66.21%. On the other hand Republic Services has an analysts' consensus of $256.87 which suggests that it could grow by 1.1%. Given that Perma-Fix Environmental Services has higher upside potential than Republic Services, analysts believe Perma-Fix Environmental Services is more attractive than Republic Services.

Perma-Fix Environmental Services has a beta of 0.178, which suggesting that the stock is 82.214% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Republic Services has a beta of 0.655, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 34.487%.

Perma-Fix Environmental Services has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Republic Services offers a yield of 0.9% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.58 per share. Perma-Fix Environmental Services pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Republic Services pays out 33.63% of its earnings as a dividend. Republic Services's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Perma-Fix Environmental Services quarterly revenues are $13.9M, which are smaller than Republic Services quarterly revenues of $4B. Perma-Fix Environmental Services's net income of -$3.6M is lower than Republic Services's net income of $495M. Notably, Perma-Fix Environmental Services's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Republic Services's PE ratio is 38.32x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Perma-Fix Environmental Services is 2.96x versus 4.93x for Republic Services. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Waste Management has a net margin of -25.67% compared to Perma-Fix Environmental Services's net margin of 10.59%. Perma-Fix Environmental Services's return on equity of -39.8% beat Waste Management's return on equity of 33.94%.

Perma-Fix Environmental Services has a consensus price target of $18.00, signalling upside risk potential of 66.21%. On the other hand Waste Management has an analysts' consensus of $247.35 which suggests that it could grow by 4.3%. Given that Perma-Fix Environmental Services has higher upside potential than Waste Management, analysts believe Perma-Fix Environmental Services is more attractive than Waste Management.

Perma-Fix Environmental Services has a beta of 0.178, which suggesting that the stock is 82.214% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Waste Management has a beta of 0.674, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 32.562%.

Perma-Fix Environmental Services has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Waste Management offers a yield of 1.3% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.83 per share. Perma-Fix Environmental Services pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Waste Management pays out 44.06% of its earnings as a dividend. Waste Management's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Perma-Fix Environmental Services quarterly revenues are $13.9M, which are smaller than Waste Management quarterly revenues of $6B. Perma-Fix Environmental Services's net income of -$3.6M is lower than Waste Management's net income of $637M. Notably, Perma-Fix Environmental Services's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Waste Management's PE ratio is 35.77x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Perma-Fix Environmental Services is 2.96x versus 4.18x for Waste Management. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Zurn Elkay Water Solutions has a net margin of -25.67% compared to Perma-Fix Environmental Services's net margin of 11.21%. Perma-Fix Environmental Services's return on equity of -39.8% beat Zurn Elkay Water Solutions's return on equity of 10.69%.

Perma-Fix Environmental Services has a consensus price target of $18.00, signalling upside risk potential of 66.21%. On the other hand Zurn Elkay Water Solutions has an analysts' consensus of $37.00 which suggests that it could grow by 2.07%. Given that Perma-Fix Environmental Services has higher upside potential than Zurn Elkay Water Solutions, analysts believe Perma-Fix Environmental Services is more attractive than Zurn Elkay Water Solutions.

Perma-Fix Environmental Services has a beta of 0.178, which suggesting that the stock is 82.214% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Zurn Elkay Water Solutions has a beta of 1.067, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 6.72%.

Perma-Fix Environmental Services has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Zurn Elkay Water Solutions offers a yield of 0.97% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.09 per share. Perma-Fix Environmental Services pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Zurn Elkay Water Solutions pays out 35.33% of its earnings as a dividend. Zurn Elkay Water Solutions's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Perma-Fix Environmental Services quarterly revenues are $13.9M, which are smaller than Zurn Elkay Water Solutions quarterly revenues of $388.8M. Perma-Fix Environmental Services's net income of -$3.6M is lower than Zurn Elkay Water Solutions's net income of $43.6M. Notably, Perma-Fix Environmental Services's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Zurn Elkay Water Solutions's PE ratio is 36.62x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Perma-Fix Environmental Services is 2.96x versus 3.98x for Zurn Elkay Water Solutions. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.