Financhill
Sell
38

ZIM Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Last price:
$15.92
Seasonality move :
-15.79%
Day range:
$15.74 - $16.12
52-week range:
$11.04 - $30.15
Dividend yield:
47.99%
P/E ratio:
0.82x
P/S ratio:
0.22x
P/B ratio:
0.49x
Volume:
4.4M
Avg. volume:
6.4M
1-year change:
-10.8%
Market cap:
$1.9B
Revenue:
$8.4B
EPS (TTM):
$19.53

Price Performance History

Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks

SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS

GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS

Competitors

Company Revenue Forecast Earnings Forecast Revenue Growth Forecast Earnings Growth Forecast Analyst Price Target Median
ZIM
ZIM Integrated Shipping Services
$1.8B $1.44 -6.43% -53.27% $14.51
CSTE
Caesarstone
$106.9M -$0.18 -10.49% -33.33% $5.00
ESLT
Elbit Systems
$1.9B $2.57 16.16% 46.02% $372.33
KRNT
Kornit Digital
$52.1M $0.02 7.08% -85.25% $30.17
SPCB
SuperCom
$6.5M $0.44 -14.43% -60.82% $14.00
TATT
TAT Technologies
$43.8M $0.30 20.04% 20% $35.50
Company Price Analyst Target Market Cap P/E Ratio Dividend per Share Dividend Yield Price / LTM Sales
ZIM
ZIM Integrated Shipping Services
$15.94 $14.51 $1.9B 0.82x $0.74 47.99% 0.22x
CSTE
Caesarstone
$1.75 $5.00 $60.5M -- $0.00 0% 0.14x
ESLT
Elbit Systems
$447.42 $372.33 $20.7B 56.78x $0.60 0.49% 2.80x
KRNT
Kornit Digital
$20.14 $30.17 $912.9M -- $0.00 0% 4.59x
SPCB
SuperCom
$10.52 $14.00 $46.8M 14.30x $0.00 0% 0.69x
TATT
TAT Technologies
$29.82 $35.50 $326.2M 25.71x $0.00 0% 2.06x
Company Total Debt / Total Capital Beta Debt to Equity Quick Ratio
ZIM
ZIM Integrated Shipping Services
2.54% 0.238 5.86% 1.10x
CSTE
Caesarstone
1.49% 1.459 4.97% 1.46x
ESLT
Elbit Systems
20.97% -0.678 5.11% 0.70x
KRNT
Kornit Digital
-- 3.560 -- 10.24x
SPCB
SuperCom
41.47% 5.822 106.43% 7.79x
TATT
TAT Technologies
16.54% 1.155 7.68% 0.92x
Company Gross Profit Operating Income Return on Invested Capital Return on Common Equity EBIT Margin Free Cash Flow
ZIM
ZIM Integrated Shipping Services
$533.2M $466.7M 65.63% 67.71% 25.13% $776.7M
CSTE
Caesarstone
$21.2M -$11.3M -16.96% -17.3% -11.38% -$16.8M
ESLT
Elbit Systems
$454.3M $149.7M 8.6% 11.29% 8.16% $160.9M
KRNT
Kornit Digital
$19.8M -$12.1M -1.14% -1.14% -25.98% $2M
SPCB
SuperCom
$4.5M $1.2M 12.21% 44.56% 17.24% --
TATT
TAT Technologies
$10M $4.2M 10.2% 12.24% 10.55% -$7.9M

ZIM Integrated Shipping Services vs. Competitors

  • Which has Higher Returns ZIM or CSTE?

    Caesarstone has a net margin of 14.72% compared to ZIM Integrated Shipping Services's net margin of -12.94%. ZIM Integrated Shipping Services's return on equity of 67.71% beat Caesarstone's return on equity of -17.3%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    ZIM
    ZIM Integrated Shipping Services
    26.57% $2.45 $4.1B
    CSTE
    Caesarstone
    21.26% -$0.37 $265.4M
  • What do Analysts Say About ZIM or CSTE?

    ZIM Integrated Shipping Services has a consensus price target of $14.51, signalling downside risk potential of -8.97%. On the other hand Caesarstone has an analysts' consensus of $5.00 which suggests that it could grow by 128.57%. Given that Caesarstone has higher upside potential than ZIM Integrated Shipping Services, analysts believe Caesarstone is more attractive than ZIM Integrated Shipping Services.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    ZIM
    ZIM Integrated Shipping Services
    0 2 2
    CSTE
    Caesarstone
    1 0 0
  • Is ZIM or CSTE More Risky?

    ZIM Integrated Shipping Services has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Caesarstone has a beta of 0.220, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 77.954%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock ZIM or CSTE?

    ZIM Integrated Shipping Services has a quarterly dividend of $0.74 per share corresponding to a yield of 47.99%. Caesarstone offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. ZIM Integrated Shipping Services pays 26.97% of its earnings as a dividend. Caesarstone pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. ZIM Integrated Shipping Services's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios ZIM or CSTE?

    ZIM Integrated Shipping Services quarterly revenues are $2B, which are larger than Caesarstone quarterly revenues of $99.6M. ZIM Integrated Shipping Services's net income of $295.3M is higher than Caesarstone's net income of -$12.9M. Notably, ZIM Integrated Shipping Services's price-to-earnings ratio is 0.82x while Caesarstone's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ZIM Integrated Shipping Services is 0.22x versus 0.14x for Caesarstone. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    ZIM
    ZIM Integrated Shipping Services
    0.22x 0.82x $2B $295.3M
    CSTE
    Caesarstone
    0.14x -- $99.6M -$12.9M
  • Which has Higher Returns ZIM or ESLT?

    Elbit Systems has a net margin of 14.72% compared to ZIM Integrated Shipping Services's net margin of 5.65%. ZIM Integrated Shipping Services's return on equity of 67.71% beat Elbit Systems's return on equity of 11.29%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    ZIM
    ZIM Integrated Shipping Services
    26.57% $2.45 $4.1B
    ESLT
    Elbit Systems
    23.96% $2.35 $4.2B
  • What do Analysts Say About ZIM or ESLT?

    ZIM Integrated Shipping Services has a consensus price target of $14.51, signalling downside risk potential of -8.97%. On the other hand Elbit Systems has an analysts' consensus of $372.33 which suggests that it could fall by -16.78%. Given that Elbit Systems has more downside risk than ZIM Integrated Shipping Services, analysts believe ZIM Integrated Shipping Services is more attractive than Elbit Systems.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    ZIM
    ZIM Integrated Shipping Services
    0 2 2
    ESLT
    Elbit Systems
    0 3 0
  • Is ZIM or ESLT More Risky?

    ZIM Integrated Shipping Services has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Elbit Systems has a beta of 0.329, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 67.092%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock ZIM or ESLT?

    ZIM Integrated Shipping Services has a quarterly dividend of $0.74 per share corresponding to a yield of 47.99%. Elbit Systems offers a yield of 0.49% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.60 per share. ZIM Integrated Shipping Services pays 26.97% of its earnings as a dividend. Elbit Systems pays out 27.7% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios ZIM or ESLT?

    ZIM Integrated Shipping Services quarterly revenues are $2B, which are larger than Elbit Systems quarterly revenues of $1.9B. ZIM Integrated Shipping Services's net income of $295.3M is higher than Elbit Systems's net income of $107.1M. Notably, ZIM Integrated Shipping Services's price-to-earnings ratio is 0.82x while Elbit Systems's PE ratio is 56.78x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ZIM Integrated Shipping Services is 0.22x versus 2.80x for Elbit Systems. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    ZIM
    ZIM Integrated Shipping Services
    0.22x 0.82x $2B $295.3M
    ESLT
    Elbit Systems
    2.80x 56.78x $1.9B $107.1M
  • Which has Higher Returns ZIM or KRNT?

    Kornit Digital has a net margin of 14.72% compared to ZIM Integrated Shipping Services's net margin of -10.89%. ZIM Integrated Shipping Services's return on equity of 67.71% beat Kornit Digital's return on equity of -1.14%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    ZIM
    ZIM Integrated Shipping Services
    26.57% $2.45 $4.1B
    KRNT
    Kornit Digital
    42.62% -$0.11 $720.8M
  • What do Analysts Say About ZIM or KRNT?

    ZIM Integrated Shipping Services has a consensus price target of $14.51, signalling downside risk potential of -8.97%. On the other hand Kornit Digital has an analysts' consensus of $30.17 which suggests that it could grow by 49.79%. Given that Kornit Digital has higher upside potential than ZIM Integrated Shipping Services, analysts believe Kornit Digital is more attractive than ZIM Integrated Shipping Services.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    ZIM
    ZIM Integrated Shipping Services
    0 2 2
    KRNT
    Kornit Digital
    3 1 0
  • Is ZIM or KRNT More Risky?

    ZIM Integrated Shipping Services has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kornit Digital has a beta of 1.878, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 87.758%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock ZIM or KRNT?

    ZIM Integrated Shipping Services has a quarterly dividend of $0.74 per share corresponding to a yield of 47.99%. Kornit Digital offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. ZIM Integrated Shipping Services pays 26.97% of its earnings as a dividend. Kornit Digital pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. ZIM Integrated Shipping Services's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios ZIM or KRNT?

    ZIM Integrated Shipping Services quarterly revenues are $2B, which are larger than Kornit Digital quarterly revenues of $46.5M. ZIM Integrated Shipping Services's net income of $295.3M is higher than Kornit Digital's net income of -$5.1M. Notably, ZIM Integrated Shipping Services's price-to-earnings ratio is 0.82x while Kornit Digital's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ZIM Integrated Shipping Services is 0.22x versus 4.59x for Kornit Digital. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    ZIM
    ZIM Integrated Shipping Services
    0.22x 0.82x $2B $295.3M
    KRNT
    Kornit Digital
    4.59x -- $46.5M -$5.1M
  • Which has Higher Returns ZIM or SPCB?

    SuperCom has a net margin of 14.72% compared to ZIM Integrated Shipping Services's net margin of 59.95%. ZIM Integrated Shipping Services's return on equity of 67.71% beat SuperCom's return on equity of 44.56%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    ZIM
    ZIM Integrated Shipping Services
    26.57% $2.45 $4.1B
    SPCB
    SuperCom
    63.28% $1.20 $59.4M
  • What do Analysts Say About ZIM or SPCB?

    ZIM Integrated Shipping Services has a consensus price target of $14.51, signalling downside risk potential of -8.97%. On the other hand SuperCom has an analysts' consensus of $14.00 which suggests that it could grow by 33.08%. Given that SuperCom has higher upside potential than ZIM Integrated Shipping Services, analysts believe SuperCom is more attractive than ZIM Integrated Shipping Services.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    ZIM
    ZIM Integrated Shipping Services
    0 2 2
    SPCB
    SuperCom
    1 0 0
  • Is ZIM or SPCB More Risky?

    ZIM Integrated Shipping Services has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison SuperCom has a beta of 1.091, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 9.059%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock ZIM or SPCB?

    ZIM Integrated Shipping Services has a quarterly dividend of $0.74 per share corresponding to a yield of 47.99%. SuperCom offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. ZIM Integrated Shipping Services pays 26.97% of its earnings as a dividend. SuperCom pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. ZIM Integrated Shipping Services's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios ZIM or SPCB?

    ZIM Integrated Shipping Services quarterly revenues are $2B, which are larger than SuperCom quarterly revenues of $7M. ZIM Integrated Shipping Services's net income of $295.3M is higher than SuperCom's net income of $4.2M. Notably, ZIM Integrated Shipping Services's price-to-earnings ratio is 0.82x while SuperCom's PE ratio is 14.30x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ZIM Integrated Shipping Services is 0.22x versus 0.69x for SuperCom. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    ZIM
    ZIM Integrated Shipping Services
    0.22x 0.82x $2B $295.3M
    SPCB
    SuperCom
    0.69x 14.30x $7M $4.2M
  • Which has Higher Returns ZIM or TATT?

    TAT Technologies has a net margin of 14.72% compared to ZIM Integrated Shipping Services's net margin of 9.05%. ZIM Integrated Shipping Services's return on equity of 67.71% beat TAT Technologies's return on equity of 12.24%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    ZIM
    ZIM Integrated Shipping Services
    26.57% $2.45 $4.1B
    TATT
    TAT Technologies
    23.62% $0.34 $139.6M
  • What do Analysts Say About ZIM or TATT?

    ZIM Integrated Shipping Services has a consensus price target of $14.51, signalling downside risk potential of -8.97%. On the other hand TAT Technologies has an analysts' consensus of $35.50 which suggests that it could grow by 19.05%. Given that TAT Technologies has higher upside potential than ZIM Integrated Shipping Services, analysts believe TAT Technologies is more attractive than ZIM Integrated Shipping Services.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    ZIM
    ZIM Integrated Shipping Services
    0 2 2
    TATT
    TAT Technologies
    4 0 0
  • Is ZIM or TATT More Risky?

    ZIM Integrated Shipping Services has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison TAT Technologies has a beta of 0.725, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 27.522%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock ZIM or TATT?

    ZIM Integrated Shipping Services has a quarterly dividend of $0.74 per share corresponding to a yield of 47.99%. TAT Technologies offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. ZIM Integrated Shipping Services pays 26.97% of its earnings as a dividend. TAT Technologies pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. ZIM Integrated Shipping Services's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios ZIM or TATT?

    ZIM Integrated Shipping Services quarterly revenues are $2B, which are larger than TAT Technologies quarterly revenues of $42.1M. ZIM Integrated Shipping Services's net income of $295.3M is higher than TAT Technologies's net income of $3.8M. Notably, ZIM Integrated Shipping Services's price-to-earnings ratio is 0.82x while TAT Technologies's PE ratio is 25.71x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ZIM Integrated Shipping Services is 0.22x versus 2.06x for TAT Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    ZIM
    ZIM Integrated Shipping Services
    0.22x 0.82x $2B $295.3M
    TATT
    TAT Technologies
    2.06x 25.71x $42.1M $3.8M

SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS

GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS

Popular

Is Roku Stock Undervalued Now?
Is Roku Stock Undervalued Now?

At roughly $89 a share, Roku (NASDAQ: ROKU) trades for barely…

Will Microsoft Be a $5 Trillion Stock?
Will Microsoft Be a $5 Trillion Stock?

Microsoft’s market capitalization sits near $3.73 trillion today. To clear the…

Where Will C3.ai Stock Be in 1 Year?
Where Will C3.ai Stock Be in 1 Year?

C3 .ai (NYSE: AI) has been the poster child for “hype versus execution.”…

Stock Ideas

Buy
69
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $4T
P/E Ratio: 56x

Buy
62
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $3.7T
P/E Ratio: 43x

Sell
45
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $3.2T
P/E Ratio: 35x

Alerts

Buy
58
INKT alert for Jul 12

MiNK Therapeutics [INKT] is up 727.94% over the past day.

Buy
51
NEGG alert for Jul 12

Newegg Commerce [NEGG] is up 74.03% over the past day.

Buy
68
ATRO alert for Jul 12

Astronics [ATRO] is up 16.28% over the past day.

THE #1 STOCK ANALYSIS TOOL
TO MAKE SMARTER BUY AND SELL DECISIONS

Show me the best stock