SPCB Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Elbit Systems has a net margin of 59.95% compared to SuperCom's net margin of 5.65%. SuperCom's return on equity of 44.56% beat Elbit Systems's return on equity of 11.29%.

SuperCom has a consensus price target of $14.00, signalling upside risk potential of 61.11%. On the other hand Elbit Systems has an analysts' consensus of $357.33 which suggests that it could fall by -5.7%. Given that SuperCom has higher upside potential than Elbit Systems, analysts believe SuperCom is more attractive than Elbit Systems.

SuperCom has a beta of 0.813, which suggesting that the stock is 18.726% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Elbit Systems has a beta of 0.312, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 68.79%.

SuperCom has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Elbit Systems offers a yield of 0.55% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.60 per share. SuperCom pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Elbit Systems pays out 27.7% of its earnings as a dividend. Elbit Systems's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

SuperCom quarterly revenues are $7M, which are smaller than Elbit Systems quarterly revenues of $1.9B. SuperCom's net income of $4.2M is lower than Elbit Systems's net income of $107.1M. Notably, SuperCom's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.81x while Elbit Systems's PE ratio is 48.09x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for SuperCom is 0.57x versus 2.37x for Elbit Systems. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Kornit Digital has a net margin of 59.95% compared to SuperCom's net margin of -10.89%. SuperCom's return on equity of 44.56% beat Kornit Digital's return on equity of -1.14%.

SuperCom has a consensus price target of $14.00, signalling upside risk potential of 61.11%. On the other hand Kornit Digital has an analysts' consensus of $30.17 which suggests that it could grow by 37.5%. Given that SuperCom has higher upside potential than Kornit Digital, analysts believe SuperCom is more attractive than Kornit Digital.

SuperCom has a beta of 0.813, which suggesting that the stock is 18.726% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kornit Digital has a beta of 1.998, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 99.818%.

SuperCom has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Kornit Digital offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. SuperCom pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Kornit Digital pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

SuperCom quarterly revenues are $7M, which are smaller than Kornit Digital quarterly revenues of $46.5M. SuperCom's net income of $4.2M is higher than Kornit Digital's net income of -$5.1M. Notably, SuperCom's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.81x while Kornit Digital's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for SuperCom is 0.57x versus 5.00x for Kornit Digital. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Rail Vision has a net margin of 59.95% compared to SuperCom's net margin of --. SuperCom's return on equity of 44.56% beat Rail Vision's return on equity of --.

SuperCom has a consensus price target of $14.00, signalling upside risk potential of 61.11%. On the other hand Rail Vision has an analysts' consensus of $2.00 which suggests that it could grow by 418%. Given that Rail Vision has higher upside potential than SuperCom, analysts believe Rail Vision is more attractive than SuperCom.

SuperCom has a beta of 0.813, which suggesting that the stock is 18.726% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Rail Vision has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

SuperCom has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Rail Vision offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. SuperCom pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Rail Vision pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

SuperCom quarterly revenues are $7M, which are larger than Rail Vision quarterly revenues of --. SuperCom's net income of $4.2M is higher than Rail Vision's net income of --. Notably, SuperCom's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.81x while Rail Vision's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for SuperCom is 0.57x versus 4.94x for Rail Vision. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

TAT Technologies has a net margin of 59.95% compared to SuperCom's net margin of 9.05%. SuperCom's return on equity of 44.56% beat TAT Technologies's return on equity of 12.24%.

SuperCom has a consensus price target of $14.00, signalling upside risk potential of 61.11%. On the other hand TAT Technologies has an analysts' consensus of $39.00 which suggests that it could grow by 28.59%. Given that SuperCom has higher upside potential than TAT Technologies, analysts believe SuperCom is more attractive than TAT Technologies.

SuperCom has a beta of 0.813, which suggesting that the stock is 18.726% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison TAT Technologies has a beta of 0.723, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 27.693%.

SuperCom has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. TAT Technologies offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. SuperCom pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. TAT Technologies pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

SuperCom quarterly revenues are $7M, which are smaller than TAT Technologies quarterly revenues of $42.1M. SuperCom's net income of $4.2M is higher than TAT Technologies's net income of $3.8M. Notably, SuperCom's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.81x while TAT Technologies's PE ratio is 26.15x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for SuperCom is 0.57x versus 2.10x for TAT Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.