TATT Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Elbit Systems has a net margin of 9.05% compared to TAT Technologies's net margin of 5.65%. TAT Technologies's return on equity of 12.24% beat Elbit Systems's return on equity of 11.29%.

TAT Technologies has a consensus price target of $35.00, signalling upside risk potential of 33.13%. On the other hand Elbit Systems has an analysts' consensus of $357.33 which suggests that it could fall by -21.45%. Given that TAT Technologies has higher upside potential than Elbit Systems, analysts believe TAT Technologies is more attractive than Elbit Systems.

TAT Technologies has a beta of 0.694, which suggesting that the stock is 30.557% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Elbit Systems has a beta of 0.308, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 69.154%.

TAT Technologies has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Elbit Systems offers a yield of 0.46% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.60 per share. TAT Technologies pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Elbit Systems pays out 27.7% of its earnings as a dividend. Elbit Systems's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

TAT Technologies quarterly revenues are $42.1M, which are smaller than Elbit Systems quarterly revenues of $1.9B. TAT Technologies's net income of $3.8M is lower than Elbit Systems's net income of $107.1M. Notably, TAT Technologies's price-to-earnings ratio is 22.66x while Elbit Systems's PE ratio is 57.73x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for TAT Technologies is 1.82x versus 2.85x for Elbit Systems. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Kornit Digital has a net margin of 9.05% compared to TAT Technologies's net margin of -10.89%. TAT Technologies's return on equity of 12.24% beat Kornit Digital's return on equity of -1.14%.

TAT Technologies has a consensus price target of $35.00, signalling upside risk potential of 33.13%. On the other hand Kornit Digital has an analysts' consensus of $30.17 which suggests that it could grow by 54.38%. Given that Kornit Digital has higher upside potential than TAT Technologies, analysts believe Kornit Digital is more attractive than TAT Technologies.

TAT Technologies has a beta of 0.694, which suggesting that the stock is 30.557% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kornit Digital has a beta of 1.929, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 92.867%.

TAT Technologies has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Kornit Digital offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. TAT Technologies pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Kornit Digital pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

TAT Technologies quarterly revenues are $42.1M, which are smaller than Kornit Digital quarterly revenues of $46.5M. TAT Technologies's net income of $3.8M is higher than Kornit Digital's net income of -$5.1M. Notably, TAT Technologies's price-to-earnings ratio is 22.66x while Kornit Digital's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for TAT Technologies is 1.82x versus 4.45x for Kornit Digital. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Rail Vision has a net margin of 9.05% compared to TAT Technologies's net margin of --. TAT Technologies's return on equity of 12.24% beat Rail Vision's return on equity of --.

TAT Technologies has a consensus price target of $35.00, signalling upside risk potential of 33.13%. On the other hand Rail Vision has an analysts' consensus of $2.00 which suggests that it could grow by 470.78%. Given that Rail Vision has higher upside potential than TAT Technologies, analysts believe Rail Vision is more attractive than TAT Technologies.

TAT Technologies has a beta of 0.694, which suggesting that the stock is 30.557% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Rail Vision has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

TAT Technologies has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Rail Vision offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. TAT Technologies pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Rail Vision pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

TAT Technologies quarterly revenues are $42.1M, which are larger than Rail Vision quarterly revenues of --. TAT Technologies's net income of $3.8M is higher than Rail Vision's net income of --. Notably, TAT Technologies's price-to-earnings ratio is 22.66x while Rail Vision's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for TAT Technologies is 1.82x versus 4.48x for Rail Vision. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

SuperCom has a net margin of 9.05% compared to TAT Technologies's net margin of 59.95%. TAT Technologies's return on equity of 12.24% beat SuperCom's return on equity of 44.56%.

TAT Technologies has a consensus price target of $35.00, signalling upside risk potential of 33.13%. On the other hand SuperCom has an analysts' consensus of $14.00 which suggests that it could grow by 42.71%. Given that SuperCom has higher upside potential than TAT Technologies, analysts believe SuperCom is more attractive than TAT Technologies.

TAT Technologies has a beta of 0.694, which suggesting that the stock is 30.557% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison SuperCom has a beta of 1.087, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 8.712%.

TAT Technologies has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. SuperCom offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. TAT Technologies pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. SuperCom pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

TAT Technologies quarterly revenues are $42.1M, which are larger than SuperCom quarterly revenues of $7M. TAT Technologies's net income of $3.8M is lower than SuperCom's net income of $4.2M. Notably, TAT Technologies's price-to-earnings ratio is 22.66x while SuperCom's PE ratio is 13.33x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for TAT Technologies is 1.82x versus 0.64x for SuperCom. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.