UVE Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

HCI Group has a net margin of 10.49% compared to Universal Insurance Holdings's net margin of 32.1%. Universal Insurance Holdings's return on equity of 17.07% beat HCI Group's return on equity of 28.29%.

Universal Insurance Holdings has a consensus price target of $29.00, signalling upside risk potential of 9.89%. On the other hand HCI Group has an analysts' consensus of $202.50 which suggests that it could grow by 35.52%. Given that HCI Group has higher upside potential than Universal Insurance Holdings, analysts believe HCI Group is more attractive than Universal Insurance Holdings.

Universal Insurance Holdings has a beta of 0.870, which suggesting that the stock is 12.972% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison HCI Group has a beta of 1.256, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 25.613%.

Universal Insurance Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.16 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.43%. HCI Group offers a yield of 1.07% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share. Universal Insurance Holdings pays 37.89% of its earnings as a dividend. HCI Group pays out 15.1% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Universal Insurance Holdings quarterly revenues are $394.9M, which are larger than HCI Group quarterly revenues of $217.1M. Universal Insurance Holdings's net income of $41.4M is lower than HCI Group's net income of $69.7M. Notably, Universal Insurance Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.52x while HCI Group's PE ratio is 14.45x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Universal Insurance Holdings is 0.49x versus 2.40x for HCI Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Heritage Insurance Holdings has a net margin of 10.49% compared to Universal Insurance Holdings's net margin of 13.2%. Universal Insurance Holdings's return on equity of 17.07% beat Heritage Insurance Holdings's return on equity of 27.99%.

Universal Insurance Holdings has a consensus price target of $29.00, signalling upside risk potential of 9.89%. On the other hand Heritage Insurance Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $29.00 which suggests that it could grow by 24.68%. Given that Heritage Insurance Holdings has higher upside potential than Universal Insurance Holdings, analysts believe Heritage Insurance Holdings is more attractive than Universal Insurance Holdings.

Universal Insurance Holdings has a beta of 0.870, which suggesting that the stock is 12.972% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Heritage Insurance Holdings has a beta of 1.029, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 2.945%.

Universal Insurance Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.16 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.43%. Heritage Insurance Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Universal Insurance Holdings pays 37.89% of its earnings as a dividend. Heritage Insurance Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Universal Insurance Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Universal Insurance Holdings quarterly revenues are $394.9M, which are larger than Heritage Insurance Holdings quarterly revenues of $230.9M. Universal Insurance Holdings's net income of $41.4M is higher than Heritage Insurance Holdings's net income of $30.5M. Notably, Universal Insurance Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.52x while Heritage Insurance Holdings's PE ratio is 9.19x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Universal Insurance Holdings is 0.49x versus 0.83x for Heritage Insurance Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Safety Insurance Group has a net margin of 10.49% compared to Universal Insurance Holdings's net margin of 7.31%. Universal Insurance Holdings's return on equity of 17.07% beat Safety Insurance Group's return on equity of 8.75%.

Universal Insurance Holdings has a consensus price target of $29.00, signalling upside risk potential of 9.89%. On the other hand Safety Insurance Group has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by -11.82%. Given that Universal Insurance Holdings has higher upside potential than Safety Insurance Group, analysts believe Universal Insurance Holdings is more attractive than Safety Insurance Group.

Universal Insurance Holdings has a beta of 0.870, which suggesting that the stock is 12.972% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Safety Insurance Group has a beta of 0.266, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 73.408%.

Universal Insurance Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.16 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.43%. Safety Insurance Group offers a yield of 4.54% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.90 per share. Universal Insurance Holdings pays 37.89% of its earnings as a dividend. Safety Insurance Group pays out 75.39% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Universal Insurance Holdings quarterly revenues are $394.9M, which are larger than Safety Insurance Group quarterly revenues of $299.6M. Universal Insurance Holdings's net income of $41.4M is higher than Safety Insurance Group's net income of $21.9M. Notably, Universal Insurance Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.52x while Safety Insurance Group's PE ratio is 16.23x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Universal Insurance Holdings is 0.49x versus 1.03x for Safety Insurance Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Selective Insurance Group has a net margin of 10.49% compared to Universal Insurance Holdings's net margin of 8.55%. Universal Insurance Holdings's return on equity of 17.07% beat Selective Insurance Group's return on equity of 7.57%.

Universal Insurance Holdings has a consensus price target of $29.00, signalling upside risk potential of 9.89%. On the other hand Selective Insurance Group has an analysts' consensus of $94.67 which suggests that it could grow by 8.27%. Given that Universal Insurance Holdings has higher upside potential than Selective Insurance Group, analysts believe Universal Insurance Holdings is more attractive than Selective Insurance Group.

Universal Insurance Holdings has a beta of 0.870, which suggesting that the stock is 12.972% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Selective Insurance Group has a beta of 0.494, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 50.563%.

Universal Insurance Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.16 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.43%. Selective Insurance Group offers a yield of 1.7% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.38 per share. Universal Insurance Holdings pays 37.89% of its earnings as a dividend. Selective Insurance Group pays out 45.47% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Universal Insurance Holdings quarterly revenues are $394.9M, which are smaller than Selective Insurance Group quarterly revenues of $1.3B. Universal Insurance Holdings's net income of $41.4M is lower than Selective Insurance Group's net income of $109.9M. Notably, Universal Insurance Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.52x while Selective Insurance Group's PE ratio is 23.83x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Universal Insurance Holdings is 0.49x versus 1.07x for Selective Insurance Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.