TPC Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Granite Construction has a net margin of -9.32% compared to Tutor Perini's net margin of 6.19%. Tutor Perini's return on equity of -10.19% beat Granite Construction's return on equity of 10.88%.

Tutor Perini has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 61.6%. On the other hand Granite Construction has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 5.08%. Given that Tutor Perini has higher upside potential than Granite Construction, analysts believe Tutor Perini is more attractive than Granite Construction.

Tutor Perini has a beta of 1.492, which suggesting that the stock is 49.195% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Granite Construction has a beta of 1.410, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 41.036%.

Tutor Perini has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Granite Construction offers a yield of 0.57% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share. Tutor Perini pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Granite Construction pays out 52.32% of its earnings as a dividend. Granite Construction's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Tutor Perini quarterly revenues are $1.1B, which are smaller than Granite Construction quarterly revenues of $1.3B. Tutor Perini's net income of -$100.9M is lower than Granite Construction's net income of $79M. Notably, Tutor Perini's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Granite Construction's PE ratio is 41.80x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Tutor Perini is 0.30x versus 1.30x for Granite Construction. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Moro has a net margin of -9.32% compared to Tutor Perini's net margin of --. Tutor Perini's return on equity of -10.19% beat Moro's return on equity of --.

Tutor Perini has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 61.6%. On the other hand Moro has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Tutor Perini has higher upside potential than Moro, analysts believe Tutor Perini is more attractive than Moro.

Tutor Perini has a beta of 1.492, which suggesting that the stock is 49.195% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Moro has a beta of 0.053, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 94.692%.

Tutor Perini has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Moro offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Tutor Perini pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Moro pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Tutor Perini quarterly revenues are $1.1B, which are larger than Moro quarterly revenues of --. Tutor Perini's net income of -$100.9M is higher than Moro's net income of --. Notably, Tutor Perini's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Moro's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Tutor Perini is 0.30x versus -- for Moro. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Construction Partners has a net margin of -9.32% compared to Tutor Perini's net margin of 5.45%. Tutor Perini's return on equity of -10.19% beat Construction Partners's return on equity of 12.82%.

Tutor Perini has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 61.6%. On the other hand Construction Partners has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 15.02%. Given that Tutor Perini has higher upside potential than Construction Partners, analysts believe Tutor Perini is more attractive than Construction Partners.

Tutor Perini has a beta of 1.492, which suggesting that the stock is 49.195% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Construction Partners has a beta of 0.701, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 29.881%.

Tutor Perini has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Construction Partners offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Tutor Perini pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Construction Partners pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Tutor Perini quarterly revenues are $1.1B, which are larger than Construction Partners quarterly revenues of $538.2M. Tutor Perini's net income of -$100.9M is lower than Construction Partners's net income of $29.3M. Notably, Tutor Perini's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Construction Partners's PE ratio is 68.50x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Tutor Perini is 0.30x versus 2.60x for Construction Partners. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Innovate has a net margin of -9.32% compared to Tutor Perini's net margin of -6.19%. Tutor Perini's return on equity of -10.19% beat Innovate's return on equity of --.

Tutor Perini has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 61.6%. On the other hand Innovate has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 849.67%. Given that Innovate has higher upside potential than Tutor Perini, analysts believe Innovate is more attractive than Tutor Perini.

Tutor Perini has a beta of 1.492, which suggesting that the stock is 49.195% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Innovate has a beta of 2.066, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 106.61%.

Tutor Perini has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Innovate offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Tutor Perini pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Innovate pays out -6.25% of its earnings as a dividend.

Tutor Perini quarterly revenues are $1.1B, which are larger than Innovate quarterly revenues of $242.2M. Tutor Perini's net income of -$100.9M is lower than Innovate's net income of -$15M. Notably, Tutor Perini's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Innovate's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Tutor Perini is 0.30x versus 0.05x for Innovate. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.