Financhill
Buy
75

OLO Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Last price:
$10.12
Seasonality move :
-4.14%
Day range:
$8.71 - $8.93
52-week range:
$4.20 - $9.78
Dividend yield:
0%
P/E ratio:
445.50x
P/S ratio:
5.03x
P/B ratio:
2.14x
Volume:
2M
Avg. volume:
1.4M
1-year change:
107.21%
Market cap:
$1.5B
Revenue:
$284.9M
EPS (TTM):
$0.02

Price Performance History

Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks

SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS

GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS

Competitors

Company Revenue Forecast Earnings Forecast Revenue Growth Forecast Earnings Growth Forecast Analyst Price Target Median
OLO
Olo
$82.2M $0.08 16.63% 150% $9.25
AFRM
Affirm Holdings
$835.2M $0.53 26.62% -89.54% $68.69
INLX
Intellinetics
$4.3M -- -8.44% -- $16.50
PATH
UiPath
$332.3M $0.10 9.85% 223.42% $14.39
TOST
Toast
$1.5B $0.23 22.64% 1012.05% $43.34
WYY
WidePoint
$39.9M -- 10.78% -- $7.50
Company Price Analyst Target Market Cap P/E Ratio Dividend per Share Dividend Yield Price / LTM Sales
OLO
Olo
$8.91 $9.25 $1.5B 445.50x $0.00 0% 5.03x
AFRM
Affirm Holdings
$68.37 $68.69 $22.1B -- $0.00 0% 7.52x
INLX
Intellinetics
$12.12 $16.50 $52.3M 248.75x $0.00 0% 2.98x
PATH
UiPath
$12.85 $14.39 $6.9B -- $0.00 0% 4.91x
TOST
Toast
$42.54 $43.34 $24.6B 184.96x $0.00 0% 5.04x
WYY
WidePoint
$3.42 $7.50 $33.4M -- $0.00 0% 0.23x
Company Total Debt / Total Capital Beta Debt to Equity Quick Ratio
OLO
Olo
-- 3.527 -- 7.47x
AFRM
Affirm Holdings
71.81% 4.858 50.24% 59.88x
INLX
Intellinetics
11.21% -0.423 2.47% 0.72x
PATH
UiPath
-- 2.110 -- 2.69x
TOST
Toast
-- 3.461 -- 1.90x
WYY
WidePoint
-- 0.593 -- 0.93x
Company Gross Profit Operating Income Return on Invested Capital Return on Common Equity EBIT Margin Free Cash Flow
OLO
Olo
$44.3M -$2.4M 0.49% 0.49% 2.36% -$1.9M
AFRM
Affirm Holdings
$512.1M $99.2M -0.64% -2.25% 14.43% $157.4M
INLX
Intellinetics
$2.9M -$684.6K -9.15% -10.61% -16.12% -$334.3K
PATH
UiPath
$292.8M -$16.4M -3.7% -3.7% -4.6% $106.2M
TOST
Toast
$346M $50M 11.09% 11.09% 3.74% $69M
WYY
WidePoint
$4.8M -$816.4K -14.61% -14.61% -2.23% -$3.3M

Olo vs. Competitors

  • Which has Higher Returns OLO or AFRM?

    Affirm Holdings has a net margin of 2.24% compared to Olo's net margin of 0.36%. Olo's return on equity of 0.49% beat Affirm Holdings's return on equity of -2.25%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    OLO
    Olo
    54.93% $0.01 $695.3M
    AFRM
    Affirm Holdings
    65.39% $0.01 $10.2B
  • What do Analysts Say About OLO or AFRM?

    Olo has a consensus price target of $9.25, signalling upside risk potential of 3.82%. On the other hand Affirm Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $68.69 which suggests that it could grow by 0.47%. Given that Olo has higher upside potential than Affirm Holdings, analysts believe Olo is more attractive than Affirm Holdings.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    OLO
    Olo
    1 4 0
    AFRM
    Affirm Holdings
    11 8 0
  • Is OLO or AFRM More Risky?

    Olo has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Affirm Holdings has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock OLO or AFRM?

    Olo has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Affirm Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Olo pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Affirm Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios OLO or AFRM?

    Olo quarterly revenues are $80.7M, which are smaller than Affirm Holdings quarterly revenues of $783.1M. Olo's net income of $1.8M is lower than Affirm Holdings's net income of $2.8M. Notably, Olo's price-to-earnings ratio is 445.50x while Affirm Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Olo is 5.03x versus 7.52x for Affirm Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    OLO
    Olo
    5.03x 445.50x $80.7M $1.8M
    AFRM
    Affirm Holdings
    7.52x -- $783.1M $2.8M
  • Which has Higher Returns OLO or INLX?

    Intellinetics has a net margin of 2.24% compared to Olo's net margin of -17.13%. Olo's return on equity of 0.49% beat Intellinetics's return on equity of -10.61%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    OLO
    Olo
    54.93% $0.01 $695.3M
    INLX
    Intellinetics
    67.55% -$0.17 $11.7M
  • What do Analysts Say About OLO or INLX?

    Olo has a consensus price target of $9.25, signalling upside risk potential of 3.82%. On the other hand Intellinetics has an analysts' consensus of $16.50 which suggests that it could grow by 36.14%. Given that Intellinetics has higher upside potential than Olo, analysts believe Intellinetics is more attractive than Olo.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    OLO
    Olo
    1 4 0
    INLX
    Intellinetics
    0 0 0
  • Is OLO or INLX More Risky?

    Olo has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Intellinetics has a beta of 0.510, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 48.997%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock OLO or INLX?

    Olo has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Intellinetics offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Olo pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Intellinetics pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios OLO or INLX?

    Olo quarterly revenues are $80.7M, which are larger than Intellinetics quarterly revenues of $4.2M. Olo's net income of $1.8M is higher than Intellinetics's net income of -$727.6K. Notably, Olo's price-to-earnings ratio is 445.50x while Intellinetics's PE ratio is 248.75x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Olo is 5.03x versus 2.98x for Intellinetics. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    OLO
    Olo
    5.03x 445.50x $80.7M $1.8M
    INLX
    Intellinetics
    2.98x 248.75x $4.2M -$727.6K
  • Which has Higher Returns OLO or PATH?

    UiPath has a net margin of 2.24% compared to Olo's net margin of -6.33%. Olo's return on equity of 0.49% beat UiPath's return on equity of -3.7%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    OLO
    Olo
    54.93% $0.01 $695.3M
    PATH
    UiPath
    82.09% -$0.04 $1.7B
  • What do Analysts Say About OLO or PATH?

    Olo has a consensus price target of $9.25, signalling upside risk potential of 3.82%. On the other hand UiPath has an analysts' consensus of $14.39 which suggests that it could grow by 11.95%. Given that UiPath has higher upside potential than Olo, analysts believe UiPath is more attractive than Olo.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    OLO
    Olo
    1 4 0
    PATH
    UiPath
    3 17 0
  • Is OLO or PATH More Risky?

    Olo has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison UiPath has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock OLO or PATH?

    Olo has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. UiPath offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Olo pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. UiPath pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios OLO or PATH?

    Olo quarterly revenues are $80.7M, which are smaller than UiPath quarterly revenues of $356.6M. Olo's net income of $1.8M is higher than UiPath's net income of -$22.6M. Notably, Olo's price-to-earnings ratio is 445.50x while UiPath's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Olo is 5.03x versus 4.91x for UiPath. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    OLO
    Olo
    5.03x 445.50x $80.7M $1.8M
    PATH
    UiPath
    4.91x -- $356.6M -$22.6M
  • Which has Higher Returns OLO or TOST?

    Toast has a net margin of 2.24% compared to Olo's net margin of 4.19%. Olo's return on equity of 0.49% beat Toast's return on equity of 11.09%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    OLO
    Olo
    54.93% $0.01 $695.3M
    TOST
    Toast
    25.88% $0.09 $1.7B
  • What do Analysts Say About OLO or TOST?

    Olo has a consensus price target of $9.25, signalling upside risk potential of 3.82%. On the other hand Toast has an analysts' consensus of $43.34 which suggests that it could grow by 1.88%. Given that Olo has higher upside potential than Toast, analysts believe Olo is more attractive than Toast.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    OLO
    Olo
    1 4 0
    TOST
    Toast
    11 16 0
  • Is OLO or TOST More Risky?

    Olo has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Toast has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock OLO or TOST?

    Olo has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Toast offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Olo pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Toast pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios OLO or TOST?

    Olo quarterly revenues are $80.7M, which are smaller than Toast quarterly revenues of $1.3B. Olo's net income of $1.8M is lower than Toast's net income of $56M. Notably, Olo's price-to-earnings ratio is 445.50x while Toast's PE ratio is 184.96x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Olo is 5.03x versus 5.04x for Toast. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    OLO
    Olo
    5.03x 445.50x $80.7M $1.8M
    TOST
    Toast
    5.04x 184.96x $1.3B $56M
  • Which has Higher Returns OLO or WYY?

    WidePoint has a net margin of 2.24% compared to Olo's net margin of -2.12%. Olo's return on equity of 0.49% beat WidePoint's return on equity of -14.61%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    OLO
    Olo
    54.93% $0.01 $695.3M
    WYY
    WidePoint
    13.97% -$0.08 $13M
  • What do Analysts Say About OLO or WYY?

    Olo has a consensus price target of $9.25, signalling upside risk potential of 3.82%. On the other hand WidePoint has an analysts' consensus of $7.50 which suggests that it could grow by 119.3%. Given that WidePoint has higher upside potential than Olo, analysts believe WidePoint is more attractive than Olo.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    OLO
    Olo
    1 4 0
    WYY
    WidePoint
    1 0 0
  • Is OLO or WYY More Risky?

    Olo has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison WidePoint has a beta of 1.603, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 60.329%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock OLO or WYY?

    Olo has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. WidePoint offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Olo pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. WidePoint pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios OLO or WYY?

    Olo quarterly revenues are $80.7M, which are larger than WidePoint quarterly revenues of $34.2M. Olo's net income of $1.8M is higher than WidePoint's net income of -$724.1K. Notably, Olo's price-to-earnings ratio is 445.50x while WidePoint's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Olo is 5.03x versus 0.23x for WidePoint. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    OLO
    Olo
    5.03x 445.50x $80.7M $1.8M
    WYY
    WidePoint
    0.23x -- $34.2M -$724.1K

SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS

GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS

Popular

Where Will Hershey Stock Be In 1 Year?
Where Will Hershey Stock Be In 1 Year?

Chocolate stocks used to be the epitome of sleepy stability,…

Where Will KNOT Stock Be In 1 Year?
Where Will KNOT Stock Be In 1 Year?

In the case of KNOT Offshore Partners (KNOP), most headlines…

Why Is Goldman Sachs Stock Up So Much?
Why Is Goldman Sachs Stock Up So Much?

Investment banking giant Goldman Sachs (NYSE:GS) has sharply outperformed the…

Stock Ideas

Buy
63
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $3.8T
P/E Ratio: 53x

Buy
60
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $3.7T
P/E Ratio: 42x

Sell
48
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $3.2T
P/E Ratio: 35x

Alerts

Buy
92
BGL alert for Jul 3

Blue Gold [BGL] is down 20.3% over the past day.

Sell
18
CNC alert for Jul 3

Centene [CNC] is down 1.3% over the past day.

Sell
12
MOH alert for Jul 3

Molina Healthcare [MOH] is up 0.3% over the past day.

THE #1 STOCK ANALYSIS TOOL
TO MAKE SMARTER BUY AND SELL DECISIONS

Show me the best stock