MOV Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Bassett Furniture Industries has a net margin of 1.08% compared to Movado Group's net margin of 2.26%. Movado Group's return on equity of 3.39% beat Bassett Furniture Industries's return on equity of -3.9%.

Movado Group has a consensus price target of $31.50, signalling upside risk potential of 103.88%. On the other hand Bassett Furniture Industries has an analysts' consensus of $19.00 which suggests that it could grow by 31.94%. Given that Movado Group has higher upside potential than Bassett Furniture Industries, analysts believe Movado Group is more attractive than Bassett Furniture Industries.

Movado Group has a beta of 1.218, which suggesting that the stock is 21.8% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Bassett Furniture Industries has a beta of 1.243, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 24.311%.

Movado Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.35 per share corresponding to a yield of 9.06%. Bassett Furniture Industries offers a yield of 5.56% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share. Movado Group pays 169.18% of its earnings as a dividend. Bassett Furniture Industries pays out -68.63% of its earnings as a dividend.

Movado Group quarterly revenues are $131.8M, which are larger than Bassett Furniture Industries quarterly revenues of $82.2M. Movado Group's net income of $1.4M is lower than Bassett Furniture Industries's net income of $1.9M. Notably, Movado Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 19.31x while Bassett Furniture Industries's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Movado Group is 0.54x versus 0.39x for Bassett Furniture Industries. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Commercial Vehicle Group has a net margin of 1.08% compared to Movado Group's net margin of -2.54%. Movado Group's return on equity of 3.39% beat Commercial Vehicle Group's return on equity of -22.04%.

Movado Group has a consensus price target of $31.50, signalling upside risk potential of 103.88%. On the other hand Commercial Vehicle Group has an analysts' consensus of $4.00 which suggests that it could grow by 183.69%. Given that Commercial Vehicle Group has higher upside potential than Movado Group, analysts believe Commercial Vehicle Group is more attractive than Movado Group.

Movado Group has a beta of 1.218, which suggesting that the stock is 21.8% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Commercial Vehicle Group has a beta of 2.032, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 103.216%.

Movado Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.35 per share corresponding to a yield of 9.06%. Commercial Vehicle Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Movado Group pays 169.18% of its earnings as a dividend. Commercial Vehicle Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Movado Group quarterly revenues are $131.8M, which are smaller than Commercial Vehicle Group quarterly revenues of $169.8M. Movado Group's net income of $1.4M is higher than Commercial Vehicle Group's net income of -$4.3M. Notably, Movado Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 19.31x while Commercial Vehicle Group's PE ratio is 1.77x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Movado Group is 0.54x versus 0.06x for Commercial Vehicle Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Hyliion Holdings has a net margin of 1.08% compared to Movado Group's net margin of -3528.43%. Movado Group's return on equity of 3.39% beat Hyliion Holdings's return on equity of --.

Movado Group has a consensus price target of $31.50, signalling upside risk potential of 103.88%. On the other hand Hyliion Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 45.99%. Given that Movado Group has higher upside potential than Hyliion Holdings, analysts believe Movado Group is more attractive than Hyliion Holdings.

Movado Group has a beta of 1.218, which suggesting that the stock is 21.8% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Hyliion Holdings has a beta of 2.738, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 173.793%.

Movado Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.35 per share corresponding to a yield of 9.06%. Hyliion Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Movado Group pays 169.18% of its earnings as a dividend. Hyliion Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Movado Group quarterly revenues are $131.8M, which are larger than Hyliion Holdings quarterly revenues of $489K. Movado Group's net income of $1.4M is higher than Hyliion Holdings's net income of -$17.3M. Notably, Movado Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 19.31x while Hyliion Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Movado Group is 0.54x versus 124.74x for Hyliion Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Northann has a net margin of 1.08% compared to Movado Group's net margin of --. Movado Group's return on equity of 3.39% beat Northann's return on equity of --.

Movado Group has a consensus price target of $31.50, signalling upside risk potential of 103.88%. On the other hand Northann has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Movado Group has higher upside potential than Northann, analysts believe Movado Group is more attractive than Northann.

Movado Group has a beta of 1.218, which suggesting that the stock is 21.8% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Northann has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Movado Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.35 per share corresponding to a yield of 9.06%. Northann offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Movado Group pays 169.18% of its earnings as a dividend. Northann pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Movado Group quarterly revenues are $131.8M, which are larger than Northann quarterly revenues of --. Movado Group's net income of $1.4M is higher than Northann's net income of --. Notably, Movado Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 19.31x while Northann's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Movado Group is 0.54x versus 0.32x for Northann. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.