AMWD Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Flexsteel Industries has a net margin of 6.39% compared to American Woodmark's net margin of -3.28%. American Woodmark's return on equity of 10.87% beat Flexsteel Industries's return on equity of 9.33%.

American Woodmark has a consensus price target of $70.33, signalling upside risk potential of 24.09%. On the other hand Flexsteel Industries has an analysts' consensus of $54.00 which suggests that it could grow by 40.19%. Given that Flexsteel Industries has higher upside potential than American Woodmark, analysts believe Flexsteel Industries is more attractive than American Woodmark.

American Woodmark has a beta of 1.211, which suggesting that the stock is 21.063% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Flexsteel Industries has a beta of 0.393, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 60.682%.

American Woodmark has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Flexsteel Industries offers a yield of 1.84% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share. American Woodmark pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Flexsteel Industries pays out 30.58% of its earnings as a dividend. Flexsteel Industries's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

American Woodmark quarterly revenues are $400.4M, which are larger than Flexsteel Industries quarterly revenues of $114M. American Woodmark's net income of $25.6M is higher than Flexsteel Industries's net income of -$3.7M. Notably, American Woodmark's price-to-earnings ratio is 8.75x while Flexsteel Industries's PE ratio is 15.17x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for American Woodmark is 0.51x versus 0.49x for Flexsteel Industries. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

MasterBrand has a net margin of 6.39% compared to American Woodmark's net margin of 2.01%. American Woodmark's return on equity of 10.87% beat MasterBrand's return on equity of 7.97%.

American Woodmark has a consensus price target of $70.33, signalling upside risk potential of 24.09%. On the other hand MasterBrand has an analysts' consensus of $15.00 which suggests that it could grow by 26.9%. Given that MasterBrand has higher upside potential than American Woodmark, analysts believe MasterBrand is more attractive than American Woodmark.

American Woodmark has a beta of 1.211, which suggesting that the stock is 21.063% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison MasterBrand has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

American Woodmark has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. MasterBrand offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. American Woodmark pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. MasterBrand pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

American Woodmark quarterly revenues are $400.4M, which are smaller than MasterBrand quarterly revenues of $660.3M. American Woodmark's net income of $25.6M is higher than MasterBrand's net income of $13.3M. Notably, American Woodmark's price-to-earnings ratio is 8.75x while MasterBrand's PE ratio is 15.15x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for American Woodmark is 0.51x versus 0.57x for MasterBrand. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Marwynn Holdings has a net margin of 6.39% compared to American Woodmark's net margin of --. American Woodmark's return on equity of 10.87% beat Marwynn Holdings's return on equity of --.

American Woodmark has a consensus price target of $70.33, signalling upside risk potential of 24.09%. On the other hand Marwynn Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that American Woodmark has higher upside potential than Marwynn Holdings, analysts believe American Woodmark is more attractive than Marwynn Holdings.

American Woodmark has a beta of 1.211, which suggesting that the stock is 21.063% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Marwynn Holdings has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

American Woodmark has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Marwynn Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. American Woodmark pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Marwynn Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

American Woodmark quarterly revenues are $400.4M, which are larger than Marwynn Holdings quarterly revenues of --. American Woodmark's net income of $25.6M is higher than Marwynn Holdings's net income of --. Notably, American Woodmark's price-to-earnings ratio is 8.75x while Marwynn Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for American Woodmark is 0.51x versus 2.43x for Marwynn Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Regional Brands has a net margin of 6.39% compared to American Woodmark's net margin of --. American Woodmark's return on equity of 10.87% beat Regional Brands's return on equity of --.

American Woodmark has a consensus price target of $70.33, signalling upside risk potential of 24.09%. On the other hand Regional Brands has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that American Woodmark has higher upside potential than Regional Brands, analysts believe American Woodmark is more attractive than Regional Brands.

American Woodmark has a beta of 1.211, which suggesting that the stock is 21.063% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Regional Brands has a beta of -0.261, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 126.093%.

American Woodmark has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Regional Brands offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $12.00 per share. American Woodmark pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Regional Brands pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

American Woodmark quarterly revenues are $400.4M, which are larger than Regional Brands quarterly revenues of --. American Woodmark's net income of $25.6M is higher than Regional Brands's net income of --. Notably, American Woodmark's price-to-earnings ratio is 8.75x while Regional Brands's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for American Woodmark is 0.51x versus 0.66x for Regional Brands. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.