MBI Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Kemper has a net margin of -442.86% compared to MBIA's net margin of 8.38%. MBIA's return on equity of -- beat Kemper's return on equity of 12.61%.

MBIA has a consensus price target of $6.50, signalling upside risk potential of 45.09%. On the other hand Kemper has an analysts' consensus of $82.20 which suggests that it could grow by 32.35%. Given that MBIA has higher upside potential than Kemper, analysts believe MBIA is more attractive than Kemper.

MBIA has a beta of 1.821, which suggesting that the stock is 82.114% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kemper has a beta of 1.279, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 27.947%.

MBIA has a quarterly dividend of $8.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Kemper offers a yield of 2.03% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.32 per share. MBIA pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Kemper pays out 25.21% of its earnings as a dividend. Kemper's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

MBIA quarterly revenues are $14M, which are smaller than Kemper quarterly revenues of $1.2B. MBIA's net income of -$62M is lower than Kemper's net income of $99.7M. Notably, MBIA's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Kemper's PE ratio is 11.61x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for MBIA is 4.98x versus 0.86x for Kemper. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Safety Insurance Group has a net margin of -442.86% compared to MBIA's net margin of 7.31%. MBIA's return on equity of -- beat Safety Insurance Group's return on equity of 8.75%.

MBIA has a consensus price target of $6.50, signalling upside risk potential of 45.09%. On the other hand Safety Insurance Group has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by -4.55%. Given that MBIA has higher upside potential than Safety Insurance Group, analysts believe MBIA is more attractive than Safety Insurance Group.

MBIA has a beta of 1.821, which suggesting that the stock is 82.114% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Safety Insurance Group has a beta of 0.255, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 74.478%.

MBIA has a quarterly dividend of $8.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Safety Insurance Group offers a yield of 4.91% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.90 per share. MBIA pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Safety Insurance Group pays out 75.39% of its earnings as a dividend. Safety Insurance Group's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

MBIA quarterly revenues are $14M, which are smaller than Safety Insurance Group quarterly revenues of $299.6M. MBIA's net income of -$62M is lower than Safety Insurance Group's net income of $21.9M. Notably, MBIA's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Safety Insurance Group's PE ratio is 15.00x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for MBIA is 4.98x versus 0.95x for Safety Insurance Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Selective Insurance Group has a net margin of -442.86% compared to MBIA's net margin of 8.55%. MBIA's return on equity of -- beat Selective Insurance Group's return on equity of 7.57%.

MBIA has a consensus price target of $6.50, signalling upside risk potential of 45.09%. On the other hand Selective Insurance Group has an analysts' consensus of $94.67 which suggests that it could grow by 7.82%. Given that MBIA has higher upside potential than Selective Insurance Group, analysts believe MBIA is more attractive than Selective Insurance Group.

MBIA has a beta of 1.821, which suggesting that the stock is 82.114% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Selective Insurance Group has a beta of 0.482, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 51.821%.

MBIA has a quarterly dividend of $8.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Selective Insurance Group offers a yield of 1.7% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.38 per share. MBIA pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Selective Insurance Group pays out 45.47% of its earnings as a dividend. Selective Insurance Group's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

MBIA quarterly revenues are $14M, which are smaller than Selective Insurance Group quarterly revenues of $1.3B. MBIA's net income of -$62M is lower than Selective Insurance Group's net income of $109.9M. Notably, MBIA's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Selective Insurance Group's PE ratio is 23.92x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for MBIA is 4.98x versus 1.08x for Selective Insurance Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

United Fire Group has a net margin of -442.86% compared to MBIA's net margin of 5.35%. MBIA's return on equity of -- beat United Fire Group's return on equity of 8.6%.

MBIA has a consensus price target of $6.50, signalling upside risk potential of 45.09%. On the other hand United Fire Group has an analysts' consensus of $30.00 which suggests that it could grow by 6.95%. Given that MBIA has higher upside potential than United Fire Group, analysts believe MBIA is more attractive than United Fire Group.

MBIA has a beta of 1.821, which suggesting that the stock is 82.114% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison United Fire Group has a beta of 0.504, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 49.605%.

MBIA has a quarterly dividend of $8.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. United Fire Group offers a yield of 2.28% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.16 per share. MBIA pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. United Fire Group pays out 26.17% of its earnings as a dividend. United Fire Group's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

MBIA quarterly revenues are $14M, which are smaller than United Fire Group quarterly revenues of $331.1M. MBIA's net income of -$62M is lower than United Fire Group's net income of $17.7M. Notably, MBIA's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while United Fire Group's PE ratio is 11.09x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for MBIA is 4.98x versus 0.56x for United Fire Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.