LEVI Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Lucid Group has a net margin of 1.25% compared to Levi Strauss &'s net margin of -496.14%. Levi Strauss &'s return on equity of 7.3% beat Lucid Group's return on equity of -71.79%.

Levi Strauss & has a consensus price target of $21.98, signalling upside risk potential of 29.25%. On the other hand Lucid Group has an analysts' consensus of $3.27 which suggests that it could fall by -8.94%. Given that Levi Strauss & has higher upside potential than Lucid Group, analysts believe Levi Strauss & is more attractive than Lucid Group.

Levi Strauss & has a beta of 1.179, which suggesting that the stock is 17.933% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lucid Group has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Levi Strauss & has a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.89%. Lucid Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Levi Strauss & pays 76.32% of its earnings as a dividend. Lucid Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Levi Strauss &'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Levi Strauss & quarterly revenues are $1.4B, which are larger than Lucid Group quarterly revenues of $200M. Levi Strauss &'s net income of $18M is higher than Lucid Group's net income of -$992.5M. Notably, Levi Strauss &'s price-to-earnings ratio is 45.58x while Lucid Group's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Levi Strauss & is 1.13x versus 9.79x for Lucid Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Nike has a net margin of 1.25% compared to Levi Strauss &'s net margin of 9.41%. Levi Strauss &'s return on equity of 7.3% beat Nike's return on equity of 34.51%.

Levi Strauss & has a consensus price target of $21.98, signalling upside risk potential of 29.25%. On the other hand Nike has an analysts' consensus of $86.60 which suggests that it could grow by 12.82%. Given that Levi Strauss & has higher upside potential than Nike, analysts believe Levi Strauss & is more attractive than Nike.

Levi Strauss & has a beta of 1.179, which suggesting that the stock is 17.933% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Nike has a beta of 1.023, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 2.318%.

Levi Strauss & has a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.89%. Nike offers a yield of 1.97% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share. Levi Strauss & pays 76.32% of its earnings as a dividend. Nike pays out 38.05% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Levi Strauss & quarterly revenues are $1.4B, which are smaller than Nike quarterly revenues of $12.4B. Levi Strauss &'s net income of $18M is lower than Nike's net income of $1.2B. Notably, Levi Strauss &'s price-to-earnings ratio is 45.58x while Nike's PE ratio is 23.69x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Levi Strauss & is 1.13x versus 2.36x for Nike. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Tesla has a net margin of 1.25% compared to Levi Strauss &'s net margin of 8.61%. Levi Strauss &'s return on equity of 7.3% beat Tesla's return on equity of 19.77%.

Levi Strauss & has a consensus price target of $21.98, signalling upside risk potential of 29.25%. On the other hand Tesla has an analysts' consensus of $283.88 which suggests that it could fall by -34.07%. Given that Levi Strauss & has higher upside potential than Tesla, analysts believe Levi Strauss & is more attractive than Tesla.

Levi Strauss & has a beta of 1.179, which suggesting that the stock is 17.933% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Tesla has a beta of 2.361, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 136.098%.

Levi Strauss & has a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.89%. Tesla offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Levi Strauss & pays 76.32% of its earnings as a dividend. Tesla pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Levi Strauss &'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Levi Strauss & quarterly revenues are $1.4B, which are smaller than Tesla quarterly revenues of $25.2B. Levi Strauss &'s net income of $18M is lower than Tesla's net income of $2.2B. Notably, Levi Strauss &'s price-to-earnings ratio is 45.58x while Tesla's PE ratio is 117.97x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Levi Strauss & is 1.13x versus 15.47x for Tesla. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Workhorse Group has a net margin of 1.25% compared to Levi Strauss &'s net margin of -1001.53%. Levi Strauss &'s return on equity of 7.3% beat Workhorse Group's return on equity of -170.46%.

Levi Strauss & has a consensus price target of $21.98, signalling upside risk potential of 29.25%. On the other hand Workhorse Group has an analysts' consensus of $3.83 which suggests that it could grow by 32.07%. Given that Workhorse Group has higher upside potential than Levi Strauss &, analysts believe Workhorse Group is more attractive than Levi Strauss &.

Levi Strauss & has a beta of 1.179, which suggesting that the stock is 17.933% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Workhorse Group has a beta of 2.628, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 162.766%.

Levi Strauss & has a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.89%. Workhorse Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Levi Strauss & pays 76.32% of its earnings as a dividend. Workhorse Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Levi Strauss &'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Levi Strauss & quarterly revenues are $1.4B, which are larger than Workhorse Group quarterly revenues of $2.5M. Levi Strauss &'s net income of $18M is higher than Workhorse Group's net income of -$25.1M. Notably, Levi Strauss &'s price-to-earnings ratio is 45.58x while Workhorse Group's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Levi Strauss & is 1.13x versus 1.51x for Workhorse Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.