PVH Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Mattel has a net margin of -2.26% compared to PVH's net margin of -4.88%. PVH's return on equity of 7.95% beat Mattel's return on equity of 24.74%.

PVH has a consensus price target of $90.13, signalling upside risk potential of 24.58%. On the other hand Mattel has an analysts' consensus of $24.18 which suggests that it could grow by 21.26%. Given that PVH has higher upside potential than Mattel, analysts believe PVH is more attractive than Mattel.

PVH has a beta of 1.813, which suggesting that the stock is 81.346% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Mattel has a beta of 0.663, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 33.704%.

PVH has a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.21%. Mattel offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. PVH pays 1.44% of its earnings as a dividend. Mattel pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. PVH's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

PVH quarterly revenues are $2B, which are larger than Mattel quarterly revenues of $826.6M. PVH's net income of -$44.8M is lower than Mattel's net income of -$40.3M. Notably, PVH's price-to-earnings ratio is 10.20x while Mattel's PE ratio is 12.78x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for PVH is 0.46x versus 1.25x for Mattel. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Rivian Automotive has a net margin of -2.26% compared to PVH's net margin of -43.95%. PVH's return on equity of 7.95% beat Rivian Automotive's return on equity of -57.26%.

PVH has a consensus price target of $90.13, signalling upside risk potential of 24.58%. On the other hand Rivian Automotive has an analysts' consensus of $14.83 which suggests that it could grow by 16.32%. Given that PVH has higher upside potential than Rivian Automotive, analysts believe PVH is more attractive than Rivian Automotive.

PVH has a beta of 1.813, which suggesting that the stock is 81.346% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Rivian Automotive has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

PVH has a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.21%. Rivian Automotive offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. PVH pays 1.44% of its earnings as a dividend. Rivian Automotive pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. PVH's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

PVH quarterly revenues are $2B, which are larger than Rivian Automotive quarterly revenues of $1.2B. PVH's net income of -$44.8M is higher than Rivian Automotive's net income of -$545M. Notably, PVH's price-to-earnings ratio is 10.20x while Rivian Automotive's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for PVH is 0.46x versus 2.68x for Rivian Automotive. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Ralph Lauren has a net margin of -2.26% compared to PVH's net margin of 7.6%. PVH's return on equity of 7.95% beat Ralph Lauren's return on equity of 29.99%.

PVH has a consensus price target of $90.13, signalling upside risk potential of 24.58%. On the other hand Ralph Lauren has an analysts' consensus of $308.95 which suggests that it could grow by 6.91%. Given that PVH has higher upside potential than Ralph Lauren, analysts believe PVH is more attractive than Ralph Lauren.

PVH has a beta of 1.813, which suggesting that the stock is 81.346% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Ralph Lauren has a beta of 1.488, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 48.75%.

PVH has a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.21%. Ralph Lauren offers a yield of 1.17% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.91 per share. PVH pays 1.44% of its earnings as a dividend. Ralph Lauren pays out 27.07% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

PVH quarterly revenues are $2B, which are larger than Ralph Lauren quarterly revenues of $1.7B. PVH's net income of -$44.8M is lower than Ralph Lauren's net income of $129M. Notably, PVH's price-to-earnings ratio is 10.20x while Ralph Lauren's PE ratio is 24.89x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for PVH is 0.46x versus 2.61x for Ralph Lauren. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Thor Industries has a net margin of -2.26% compared to PVH's net margin of 4.67%. PVH's return on equity of 7.95% beat Thor Industries's return on equity of 5.48%.

PVH has a consensus price target of $90.13, signalling upside risk potential of 24.58%. On the other hand Thor Industries has an analysts' consensus of $88.08 which suggests that it could fall by -4.38%. Given that PVH has higher upside potential than Thor Industries, analysts believe PVH is more attractive than Thor Industries.

PVH has a beta of 1.813, which suggesting that the stock is 81.346% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Thor Industries has a beta of 1.212, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 21.234%.

PVH has a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.21%. Thor Industries offers a yield of 2.17% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share. PVH pays 1.44% of its earnings as a dividend. Thor Industries pays out 38.5% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

PVH quarterly revenues are $2B, which are smaller than Thor Industries quarterly revenues of $2.9B. PVH's net income of -$44.8M is lower than Thor Industries's net income of $135.2M. Notably, PVH's price-to-earnings ratio is 10.20x while Thor Industries's PE ratio is 22.09x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for PVH is 0.46x versus 0.51x for Thor Industries. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.