PVH Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Hyzon Motors(DELISTED) has a net margin of 6.63% compared to PVH's net margin of --. PVH's return on equity of 11.6% beat Hyzon Motors(DELISTED)'s return on equity of --.

PVH has a consensus price target of $98.64, signalling upside risk potential of 45.62%. On the other hand Hyzon Motors(DELISTED) has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 12401.95%. Given that Hyzon Motors(DELISTED) has higher upside potential than PVH, analysts believe Hyzon Motors(DELISTED) is more attractive than PVH.

PVH has a beta of 1.892, which suggesting that the stock is 89.171% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Hyzon Motors(DELISTED) has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

PVH has a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.22%. Hyzon Motors(DELISTED) offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. PVH pays 1.44% of its earnings as a dividend. Hyzon Motors(DELISTED) pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. PVH's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

PVH quarterly revenues are $2.4B, which are larger than Hyzon Motors(DELISTED) quarterly revenues of --. PVH's net income of $157.2M is higher than Hyzon Motors(DELISTED)'s net income of --. Notably, PVH's price-to-earnings ratio is 6.41x while Hyzon Motors(DELISTED)'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for PVH is 0.44x versus 0.30x for Hyzon Motors(DELISTED). Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Lucid Group has a net margin of 6.63% compared to PVH's net margin of -169.41%. PVH's return on equity of 11.6% beat Lucid Group's return on equity of -70.84%.

PVH has a consensus price target of $98.64, signalling upside risk potential of 45.62%. On the other hand Lucid Group has an analysts' consensus of $2.43 which suggests that it could grow by 4.98%. Given that PVH has higher upside potential than Lucid Group, analysts believe PVH is more attractive than Lucid Group.

PVH has a beta of 1.892, which suggesting that the stock is 89.171% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lucid Group has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

PVH has a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.22%. Lucid Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. PVH pays 1.44% of its earnings as a dividend. Lucid Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. PVH's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

PVH quarterly revenues are $2.4B, which are larger than Lucid Group quarterly revenues of $234.5M. PVH's net income of $157.2M is higher than Lucid Group's net income of -$397.2M. Notably, PVH's price-to-earnings ratio is 6.41x while Lucid Group's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for PVH is 0.44x versus 6.99x for Lucid Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Levi Strauss & has a net margin of 6.63% compared to PVH's net margin of 8.84%. PVH's return on equity of 11.6% beat Levi Strauss &'s return on equity of 18.16%.

PVH has a consensus price target of $98.64, signalling upside risk potential of 45.62%. On the other hand Levi Strauss & has an analysts' consensus of $18.53 which suggests that it could grow by 31.33%. Given that PVH has higher upside potential than Levi Strauss &, analysts believe PVH is more attractive than Levi Strauss &.

PVH has a beta of 1.892, which suggesting that the stock is 89.171% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Levi Strauss & has a beta of 1.071, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 7.132%.

PVH has a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.22%. Levi Strauss & offers a yield of 3.62% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share. PVH pays 1.44% of its earnings as a dividend. Levi Strauss & pays out 94.26% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

PVH quarterly revenues are $2.4B, which are larger than Levi Strauss & quarterly revenues of $1.5B. PVH's net income of $157.2M is higher than Levi Strauss &'s net income of $135M. Notably, PVH's price-to-earnings ratio is 6.41x while Levi Strauss &'s PE ratio is 15.85x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for PVH is 0.44x versus 0.90x for Levi Strauss &. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Tesla has a net margin of 6.63% compared to PVH's net margin of 9.17%. PVH's return on equity of 11.6% beat Tesla's return on equity of 10.47%.

PVH has a consensus price target of $98.64, signalling upside risk potential of 45.62%. On the other hand Tesla has an analysts' consensus of $312.46 which suggests that it could grow by 29.36%. Given that PVH has higher upside potential than Tesla, analysts believe PVH is more attractive than Tesla.

PVH has a beta of 1.892, which suggesting that the stock is 89.171% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Tesla has a beta of 2.576, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 157.555%.

PVH has a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.22%. Tesla offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. PVH pays 1.44% of its earnings as a dividend. Tesla pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. PVH's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

PVH quarterly revenues are $2.4B, which are smaller than Tesla quarterly revenues of $25.7B. PVH's net income of $157.2M is lower than Tesla's net income of $2.4B. Notably, PVH's price-to-earnings ratio is 6.41x while Tesla's PE ratio is 118.41x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for PVH is 0.44x versus 8.65x for Tesla. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.