KOS Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Flotek Industries has a net margin of 11.03% compared to Kosmos Energy's net margin of 5.09%. Kosmos Energy's return on equity of 20.04% beat Flotek Industries's return on equity of 7.85%.

Kosmos Energy has a consensus price target of $6.58, signalling upside risk potential of 112.1%. On the other hand Flotek Industries has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 3.79%. Given that Kosmos Energy has higher upside potential than Flotek Industries, analysts believe Kosmos Energy is more attractive than Flotek Industries.

Kosmos Energy has a beta of 2.416, which suggesting that the stock is 141.589% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Flotek Industries has a beta of 1.237, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 23.698%.

Kosmos Energy has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Flotek Industries offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Kosmos Energy pays 0.08% of its earnings as a dividend. Flotek Industries pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Kosmos Energy's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Kosmos Energy quarterly revenues are $407.8M, which are larger than Flotek Industries quarterly revenues of $49.7M. Kosmos Energy's net income of $45M is higher than Flotek Industries's net income of $2.5M. Notably, Kosmos Energy's price-to-earnings ratio is 7.05x while Flotek Industries's PE ratio is 32.12x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Kosmos Energy is 0.84x versus 1.42x for Flotek Industries. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Halliburton has a net margin of 11.03% compared to Kosmos Energy's net margin of 10.02%. Kosmos Energy's return on equity of 20.04% beat Halliburton's return on equity of 26.15%.

Kosmos Energy has a consensus price target of $6.58, signalling upside risk potential of 112.1%. On the other hand Halliburton has an analysts' consensus of $37.20 which suggests that it could grow by 38.59%. Given that Kosmos Energy has higher upside potential than Halliburton, analysts believe Kosmos Energy is more attractive than Halliburton.

Kosmos Energy has a beta of 2.416, which suggesting that the stock is 141.589% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Halliburton has a beta of 1.903, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 90.341%.

Kosmos Energy has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Halliburton offers a yield of 2.53% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share. Kosmos Energy pays 0.08% of its earnings as a dividend. Halliburton pays out 21.84% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Kosmos Energy quarterly revenues are $407.8M, which are smaller than Halliburton quarterly revenues of $5.7B. Kosmos Energy's net income of $45M is lower than Halliburton's net income of $571M. Notably, Kosmos Energy's price-to-earnings ratio is 7.05x while Halliburton's PE ratio is 9.35x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Kosmos Energy is 0.84x versus 1.03x for Halliburton. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Nine Energy Service has a net margin of 11.03% compared to Kosmos Energy's net margin of -7.34%. Kosmos Energy's return on equity of 20.04% beat Nine Energy Service's return on equity of --.

Kosmos Energy has a consensus price target of $6.58, signalling upside risk potential of 112.1%. On the other hand Nine Energy Service has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 2.97%. Given that Kosmos Energy has higher upside potential than Nine Energy Service, analysts believe Kosmos Energy is more attractive than Nine Energy Service.

Kosmos Energy has a beta of 2.416, which suggesting that the stock is 141.589% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Nine Energy Service has a beta of 3.504, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 250.441%.

Kosmos Energy has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Nine Energy Service offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Kosmos Energy pays 0.08% of its earnings as a dividend. Nine Energy Service pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Kosmos Energy's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Kosmos Energy quarterly revenues are $407.8M, which are larger than Nine Energy Service quarterly revenues of $138.2M. Kosmos Energy's net income of $45M is higher than Nine Energy Service's net income of -$10.1M. Notably, Kosmos Energy's price-to-earnings ratio is 7.05x while Nine Energy Service's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Kosmos Energy is 0.84x versus 0.06x for Nine Energy Service. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Targa Resources has a net margin of 11.03% compared to Kosmos Energy's net margin of 10.06%. Kosmos Energy's return on equity of 20.04% beat Targa Resources's return on equity of 28.18%.

Kosmos Energy has a consensus price target of $6.58, signalling upside risk potential of 112.1%. On the other hand Targa Resources has an analysts' consensus of $198.41 which suggests that it could grow by 9.79%. Given that Kosmos Energy has higher upside potential than Targa Resources, analysts believe Kosmos Energy is more attractive than Targa Resources.

Kosmos Energy has a beta of 2.416, which suggesting that the stock is 141.589% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Targa Resources has a beta of 2.281, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 128.053%.

Kosmos Energy has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Targa Resources offers a yield of 1.52% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.75 per share. Kosmos Energy pays 0.08% of its earnings as a dividend. Targa Resources pays out 31.75% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Kosmos Energy quarterly revenues are $407.8M, which are smaller than Targa Resources quarterly revenues of $3.9B. Kosmos Energy's net income of $45M is lower than Targa Resources's net income of $387.4M. Notably, Kosmos Energy's price-to-earnings ratio is 7.05x while Targa Resources's PE ratio is 32.68x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Kosmos Energy is 0.84x versus 2.48x for Targa Resources. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.