NINE Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Core Laboratories has a net margin of -7.34% compared to Nine Energy Service's net margin of 8.74%. Nine Energy Service's return on equity of -- beat Core Laboratories's return on equity of 10.93%.

Nine Energy Service has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 2.97%. On the other hand Core Laboratories has an analysts' consensus of $19.33 which suggests that it could grow by 14.26%. Given that Core Laboratories has higher upside potential than Nine Energy Service, analysts believe Core Laboratories is more attractive than Nine Energy Service.

Nine Energy Service has a beta of 3.504, which suggesting that the stock is 250.441% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Core Laboratories has a beta of 2.352, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 135.22%.

Nine Energy Service has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Core Laboratories offers a yield of 0.24% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share. Nine Energy Service pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Core Laboratories pays out 5.09% of its earnings as a dividend. Core Laboratories's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Nine Energy Service quarterly revenues are $138.2M, which are larger than Core Laboratories quarterly revenues of $134.4M. Nine Energy Service's net income of -$10.1M is lower than Core Laboratories's net income of $11.7M. Notably, Nine Energy Service's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Core Laboratories's PE ratio is 30.76x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Nine Energy Service is 0.06x versus 1.54x for Core Laboratories. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Flotek Industries has a net margin of -7.34% compared to Nine Energy Service's net margin of 5.09%. Nine Energy Service's return on equity of -- beat Flotek Industries's return on equity of 7.85%.

Nine Energy Service has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 2.97%. On the other hand Flotek Industries has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 3.79%. Given that Flotek Industries has higher upside potential than Nine Energy Service, analysts believe Flotek Industries is more attractive than Nine Energy Service.

Nine Energy Service has a beta of 3.504, which suggesting that the stock is 250.441% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Flotek Industries has a beta of 1.237, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 23.698%.

Nine Energy Service has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Flotek Industries offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Nine Energy Service pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Flotek Industries pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Nine Energy Service quarterly revenues are $138.2M, which are larger than Flotek Industries quarterly revenues of $49.7M. Nine Energy Service's net income of -$10.1M is lower than Flotek Industries's net income of $2.5M. Notably, Nine Energy Service's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Flotek Industries's PE ratio is 32.12x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Nine Energy Service is 0.06x versus 1.42x for Flotek Industries. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

MPLX LP has a net margin of -7.34% compared to Nine Energy Service's net margin of 37.36%. Nine Energy Service's return on equity of -- beat MPLX LP's return on equity of 31.81%.

Nine Energy Service has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 2.97%. On the other hand MPLX LP has an analysts' consensus of $51.25 which suggests that it could grow by 5.76%. Given that MPLX LP has higher upside potential than Nine Energy Service, analysts believe MPLX LP is more attractive than Nine Energy Service.

Nine Energy Service has a beta of 3.504, which suggesting that the stock is 250.441% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison MPLX LP has a beta of 1.426, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 42.634%.

Nine Energy Service has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. MPLX LP offers a yield of 7.24% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.96 per share. Nine Energy Service pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. MPLX LP pays out 83.91% of its earnings as a dividend. MPLX LP's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Nine Energy Service quarterly revenues are $138.2M, which are smaller than MPLX LP quarterly revenues of $2.8B. Nine Energy Service's net income of -$10.1M is lower than MPLX LP's net income of $1B. Notably, Nine Energy Service's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while MPLX LP's PE ratio is 11.43x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Nine Energy Service is 0.06x versus 4.57x for MPLX LP. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Smart Sand has a net margin of -7.34% compared to Nine Energy Service's net margin of -0.16%. Nine Energy Service's return on equity of -- beat Smart Sand's return on equity of -2.27%.

Nine Energy Service has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 2.97%. On the other hand Smart Sand has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 38.89%. Given that Smart Sand has higher upside potential than Nine Energy Service, analysts believe Smart Sand is more attractive than Nine Energy Service.

Nine Energy Service has a beta of 3.504, which suggesting that the stock is 250.441% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Smart Sand has a beta of 1.097, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 9.742%.

Nine Energy Service has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Smart Sand offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share. Nine Energy Service pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Smart Sand pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Nine Energy Service quarterly revenues are $138.2M, which are larger than Smart Sand quarterly revenues of $63.2M. Nine Energy Service's net income of -$10.1M is lower than Smart Sand's net income of -$98K. Notably, Nine Energy Service's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Smart Sand's PE ratio is 52.50x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Nine Energy Service is 0.06x versus 0.30x for Smart Sand. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.