Financhill
Buy
52

NINE Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Last price:
$0.87
Seasonality move :
-21.6%
Day range:
$0.75 - $0.87
52-week range:
$0.44 - $2.02
Dividend yield:
0%
P/E ratio:
--
P/S ratio:
0.06x
P/B ratio:
--
Volume:
1.2M
Avg. volume:
6M
1-year change:
-49.06%
Market cap:
$36.7M
Revenue:
$554.1M
EPS (TTM):
-$1.06

Price Performance History

Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks

SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS

GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS

Competitors

Company Revenue Forecast Earnings Forecast Revenue Growth Forecast Earnings Growth Forecast Analyst Price Target Median
NINE
Nine Energy Service
$143M -$0.22 8.46% -45% $0.75
AROC
Archrock
$365.8M $0.39 35.24% 76.19% $30.88
DWSN
Dawson Geophysical
-- -- -- -- --
FTK
Flotek Industries
$52.4M $0.09 13.54% 50% $13.50
KMI
Kinder Morgan
$3.7B $0.27 4.22% 3.7% $30.49
MTR
Mesa Royalty Trust
-- -- -- -- --
Company Price Analyst Target Market Cap P/E Ratio Dividend per Share Dividend Yield Price / LTM Sales
NINE
Nine Energy Service
$0.87 $0.75 $36.7M -- $0.00 0% 0.06x
AROC
Archrock
$24.71 $30.88 $4.4B 20.94x $0.19 2.91% 3.34x
DWSN
Dawson Geophysical
$1.43 -- $44.3M -- $0.32 0% 0.75x
FTK
Flotek Industries
$14.86 $13.50 $443.2M 33.02x $0.00 0% 2.30x
KMI
Kinder Morgan
$28.50 $30.49 $63.3B 24.57x $0.29 4.05% 4.08x
MTR
Mesa Royalty Trust
$5.63 -- $10.5M 24.87x $0.04 2.92% 18.20x
Company Total Debt / Total Capital Beta Debt to Equity Quick Ratio
NINE
Nine Energy Service
128.93% 3.989 671.62% 1.31x
AROC
Archrock
62.99% 1.741 49.89% 0.92x
DWSN
Dawson Geophysical
16.59% 0.807 9.54% 1.16x
FTK
Flotek Industries
0.01% 6.314 0.01% 1.80x
KMI
Kinder Morgan
51.81% 0.639 50.84% 0.27x
MTR
Mesa Royalty Trust
-- 1.421 0.53% 31.70x
Company Gross Profit Operating Income Return on Invested Capital Return on Common Equity EBIT Margin Free Cash Flow
NINE
Nine Energy Service
$19.4M $6.1M -15.3% -- 3.94% -$9.3M
AROC
Archrock
$164.5M $127.3M 7.53% 17.64% 37.37% -$52.5M
DWSN
Dawson Geophysical
$14.8M $1M -38.78% -42.79% 6.66% $1.8M
FTK
Flotek Industries
$12.4M $5.6M 12.59% 12.95% 10.25% $6.7M
KMI
Kinder Morgan
$2.2B $1.1B 4.05% 8.13% 27% $396M
MTR
Mesa Royalty Trust
-- $61.3K 13.54% 13.54% 55.22% --

Nine Energy Service vs. Competitors

  • Which has Higher Returns NINE or AROC?

    Archrock has a net margin of -4.69% compared to Nine Energy Service's net margin of 20.41%. Nine Energy Service's return on equity of -- beat Archrock's return on equity of 17.64%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    NINE
    Nine Energy Service
    12.87% -$0.18 $249.3M
    AROC
    Archrock
    47.38% $0.40 $3.6B
  • What do Analysts Say About NINE or AROC?

    Nine Energy Service has a consensus price target of $0.75, signalling downside risk potential of -13.4%. On the other hand Archrock has an analysts' consensus of $30.88 which suggests that it could grow by 25.66%. Given that Archrock has higher upside potential than Nine Energy Service, analysts believe Archrock is more attractive than Nine Energy Service.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    NINE
    Nine Energy Service
    0 0 1
    AROC
    Archrock
    4 0 0
  • Is NINE or AROC More Risky?

    Nine Energy Service has a beta of 2.642, which suggesting that the stock is 164.159% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Archrock has a beta of 1.086, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 8.571%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock NINE or AROC?

    Nine Energy Service has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Archrock offers a yield of 2.91% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.19 per share. Nine Energy Service pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Archrock pays out 64.09% of its earnings as a dividend. Archrock's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios NINE or AROC?

    Nine Energy Service quarterly revenues are $150.5M, which are smaller than Archrock quarterly revenues of $347.2M. Nine Energy Service's net income of -$7.1M is lower than Archrock's net income of $70.9M. Notably, Nine Energy Service's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Archrock's PE ratio is 20.94x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Nine Energy Service is 0.06x versus 3.34x for Archrock. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    NINE
    Nine Energy Service
    0.06x -- $150.5M -$7.1M
    AROC
    Archrock
    3.34x 20.94x $347.2M $70.9M
  • Which has Higher Returns NINE or DWSN?

    Dawson Geophysical has a net margin of -4.69% compared to Nine Energy Service's net margin of 6.17%. Nine Energy Service's return on equity of -- beat Dawson Geophysical's return on equity of -42.79%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    NINE
    Nine Energy Service
    12.87% -$0.18 $249.3M
    DWSN
    Dawson Geophysical
    92.1% $0.03 $21.9M
  • What do Analysts Say About NINE or DWSN?

    Nine Energy Service has a consensus price target of $0.75, signalling downside risk potential of -13.4%. On the other hand Dawson Geophysical has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 179.72%. Given that Dawson Geophysical has higher upside potential than Nine Energy Service, analysts believe Dawson Geophysical is more attractive than Nine Energy Service.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    NINE
    Nine Energy Service
    0 0 1
    DWSN
    Dawson Geophysical
    0 0 0
  • Is NINE or DWSN More Risky?

    Nine Energy Service has a beta of 2.642, which suggesting that the stock is 164.159% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Dawson Geophysical has a beta of 0.030, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 96.979%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock NINE or DWSN?

    Nine Energy Service has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Dawson Geophysical offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.32 per share. Nine Energy Service pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Dawson Geophysical pays out -239.38% of its earnings as a dividend.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios NINE or DWSN?

    Nine Energy Service quarterly revenues are $150.5M, which are larger than Dawson Geophysical quarterly revenues of $16.1M. Nine Energy Service's net income of -$7.1M is lower than Dawson Geophysical's net income of $992K. Notably, Nine Energy Service's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Dawson Geophysical's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Nine Energy Service is 0.06x versus 0.75x for Dawson Geophysical. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    NINE
    Nine Energy Service
    0.06x -- $150.5M -$7.1M
    DWSN
    Dawson Geophysical
    0.75x -- $16.1M $992K
  • Which has Higher Returns NINE or FTK?

    Flotek Industries has a net margin of -4.69% compared to Nine Energy Service's net margin of 9.72%. Nine Energy Service's return on equity of -- beat Flotek Industries's return on equity of 12.95%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    NINE
    Nine Energy Service
    12.87% -$0.18 $249.3M
    FTK
    Flotek Industries
    22.49% $0.17 $119.7M
  • What do Analysts Say About NINE or FTK?

    Nine Energy Service has a consensus price target of $0.75, signalling downside risk potential of -13.4%. On the other hand Flotek Industries has an analysts' consensus of $13.50 which suggests that it could fall by -9.15%. Given that Nine Energy Service has more downside risk than Flotek Industries, analysts believe Flotek Industries is more attractive than Nine Energy Service.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    NINE
    Nine Energy Service
    0 0 1
    FTK
    Flotek Industries
    1 0 0
  • Is NINE or FTK More Risky?

    Nine Energy Service has a beta of 2.642, which suggesting that the stock is 164.159% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Flotek Industries has a beta of 1.356, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 35.582%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock NINE or FTK?

    Nine Energy Service has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Flotek Industries offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Nine Energy Service pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Flotek Industries pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios NINE or FTK?

    Nine Energy Service quarterly revenues are $150.5M, which are larger than Flotek Industries quarterly revenues of $55.4M. Nine Energy Service's net income of -$7.1M is lower than Flotek Industries's net income of $5.4M. Notably, Nine Energy Service's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Flotek Industries's PE ratio is 33.02x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Nine Energy Service is 0.06x versus 2.30x for Flotek Industries. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    NINE
    Nine Energy Service
    0.06x -- $150.5M -$7.1M
    FTK
    Flotek Industries
    2.30x 33.02x $55.4M $5.4M
  • Which has Higher Returns NINE or KMI?

    Kinder Morgan has a net margin of -4.69% compared to Nine Energy Service's net margin of 16.91%. Nine Energy Service's return on equity of -- beat Kinder Morgan's return on equity of 8.13%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    NINE
    Nine Energy Service
    12.87% -$0.18 $249.3M
    KMI
    Kinder Morgan
    50.81% $0.32 $64.8B
  • What do Analysts Say About NINE or KMI?

    Nine Energy Service has a consensus price target of $0.75, signalling downside risk potential of -13.4%. On the other hand Kinder Morgan has an analysts' consensus of $30.49 which suggests that it could grow by 6.98%. Given that Kinder Morgan has higher upside potential than Nine Energy Service, analysts believe Kinder Morgan is more attractive than Nine Energy Service.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    NINE
    Nine Energy Service
    0 0 1
    KMI
    Kinder Morgan
    9 8 0
  • Is NINE or KMI More Risky?

    Nine Energy Service has a beta of 2.642, which suggesting that the stock is 164.159% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kinder Morgan has a beta of 0.748, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 25.247%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock NINE or KMI?

    Nine Energy Service has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Kinder Morgan offers a yield of 4.05% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.29 per share. Nine Energy Service pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Kinder Morgan pays out 97.86% of its earnings as a dividend. Kinder Morgan's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios NINE or KMI?

    Nine Energy Service quarterly revenues are $150.5M, which are smaller than Kinder Morgan quarterly revenues of $4.2B. Nine Energy Service's net income of -$7.1M is lower than Kinder Morgan's net income of $717M. Notably, Nine Energy Service's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Kinder Morgan's PE ratio is 24.57x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Nine Energy Service is 0.06x versus 4.08x for Kinder Morgan. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    NINE
    Nine Energy Service
    0.06x -- $150.5M -$7.1M
    KMI
    Kinder Morgan
    4.08x 24.57x $4.2B $717M
  • Which has Higher Returns NINE or MTR?

    Mesa Royalty Trust has a net margin of -4.69% compared to Nine Energy Service's net margin of 73%. Nine Energy Service's return on equity of -- beat Mesa Royalty Trust's return on equity of 13.54%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    NINE
    Nine Energy Service
    12.87% -$0.18 $249.3M
    MTR
    Mesa Royalty Trust
    -- $0.04 $3.1M
  • What do Analysts Say About NINE or MTR?

    Nine Energy Service has a consensus price target of $0.75, signalling downside risk potential of -13.4%. On the other hand Mesa Royalty Trust has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Nine Energy Service has higher upside potential than Mesa Royalty Trust, analysts believe Nine Energy Service is more attractive than Mesa Royalty Trust.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    NINE
    Nine Energy Service
    0 0 1
    MTR
    Mesa Royalty Trust
    0 0 0
  • Is NINE or MTR More Risky?

    Nine Energy Service has a beta of 2.642, which suggesting that the stock is 164.159% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Mesa Royalty Trust has a beta of 0.399, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 60.085%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock NINE or MTR?

    Nine Energy Service has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Mesa Royalty Trust offers a yield of 2.92% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share. Nine Energy Service pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Mesa Royalty Trust pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios NINE or MTR?

    Nine Energy Service quarterly revenues are $150.5M, which are larger than Mesa Royalty Trust quarterly revenues of $111K. Nine Energy Service's net income of -$7.1M is lower than Mesa Royalty Trust's net income of $81K. Notably, Nine Energy Service's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Mesa Royalty Trust's PE ratio is 24.87x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Nine Energy Service is 0.06x versus 18.20x for Mesa Royalty Trust. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    NINE
    Nine Energy Service
    0.06x -- $150.5M -$7.1M
    MTR
    Mesa Royalty Trust
    18.20x 24.87x $111K $81K

SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS

GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS

Popular

Where Will Hershey Stock Be In 1 Year?
Where Will Hershey Stock Be In 1 Year?

Chocolate stocks used to be the epitome of sleepy stability,…

Where Will KNOT Stock Be In 1 Year?
Where Will KNOT Stock Be In 1 Year?

In the case of KNOT Offshore Partners (KNOP), most headlines…

Why Is Goldman Sachs Stock Up So Much?
Why Is Goldman Sachs Stock Up So Much?

Investment banking giant Goldman Sachs (NYSE:GS) has sharply outperformed the…

Stock Ideas

Buy
63
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $3.8T
P/E Ratio: 53x

Buy
60
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $3.7T
P/E Ratio: 42x

Sell
48
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $3.2T
P/E Ratio: 35x

Alerts

Sell
18
CNC alert for Jul 3

Centene [CNC] is down 40.18% over the past day.

Sell
12
MOH alert for Jul 3

Molina Healthcare [MOH] is down 22.06% over the past day.

Buy
67
GBX alert for Jul 3

Greenbrier Companies [GBX] is up 21.28% over the past day.

THE #1 STOCK ANALYSIS TOOL
TO MAKE SMARTER BUY AND SELL DECISIONS

Show me the best stock