IT Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Cantaloupe has a net margin of 13.75% compared to Gartner's net margin of 65.17%. Gartner's return on equity of 118.61% beat Cantaloupe's return on equity of 30.22%.

Gartner has a consensus price target of $485.32, signalling upside risk potential of 11.21%. On the other hand Cantaloupe has an analysts' consensus of $12.30 which suggests that it could grow by 46.95%. Given that Cantaloupe has higher upside potential than Gartner, analysts believe Cantaloupe is more attractive than Gartner.

Gartner has a beta of 1.231, which suggesting that the stock is 23.082% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Cantaloupe has a beta of 1.093, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 9.28%.

Gartner has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Cantaloupe offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Gartner pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Cantaloupe pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Gartner quarterly revenues are $1.5B, which are larger than Cantaloupe quarterly revenues of $75.4M. Gartner's net income of $210.9M is higher than Cantaloupe's net income of $49.2M. Notably, Gartner's price-to-earnings ratio is 27.16x while Cantaloupe's PE ratio is 10.59x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Gartner is 5.38x versus 2.13x for Cantaloupe. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

DXC Technology has a net margin of 13.75% compared to Gartner's net margin of 8.33%. Gartner's return on equity of 118.61% beat DXC Technology's return on equity of 12.05%.

Gartner has a consensus price target of $485.32, signalling upside risk potential of 11.21%. On the other hand DXC Technology has an analysts' consensus of $17.11 which suggests that it could grow by 12.57%. Given that DXC Technology has higher upside potential than Gartner, analysts believe DXC Technology is more attractive than Gartner.

Gartner has a beta of 1.231, which suggesting that the stock is 23.082% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison DXC Technology has a beta of 1.217, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 21.732%.

Gartner has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. DXC Technology offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Gartner pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. DXC Technology pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Gartner quarterly revenues are $1.5B, which are smaller than DXC Technology quarterly revenues of $3.2B. Gartner's net income of $210.9M is lower than DXC Technology's net income of $264M. Notably, Gartner's price-to-earnings ratio is 27.16x while DXC Technology's PE ratio is 7.20x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Gartner is 5.38x versus 0.22x for DXC Technology. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Grid Dynamics Holdings has a net margin of 13.75% compared to Gartner's net margin of 2.9%. Gartner's return on equity of 118.61% beat Grid Dynamics Holdings's return on equity of 2.47%.

Gartner has a consensus price target of $485.32, signalling upside risk potential of 11.21%. On the other hand Grid Dynamics Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $18.25 which suggests that it could grow by 45.65%. Given that Grid Dynamics Holdings has higher upside potential than Gartner, analysts believe Grid Dynamics Holdings is more attractive than Gartner.

Gartner has a beta of 1.231, which suggesting that the stock is 23.082% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Grid Dynamics Holdings has a beta of 1.069, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 6.946%.

Gartner has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Grid Dynamics Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Gartner pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Grid Dynamics Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Gartner quarterly revenues are $1.5B, which are larger than Grid Dynamics Holdings quarterly revenues of $100.4M. Gartner's net income of $210.9M is higher than Grid Dynamics Holdings's net income of $2.9M. Notably, Gartner's price-to-earnings ratio is 27.16x while Grid Dynamics Holdings's PE ratio is 104.42x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Gartner is 5.38x versus 2.82x for Grid Dynamics Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Leidos Holdings has a net margin of 13.75% compared to Gartner's net margin of 8.55%. Gartner's return on equity of 118.61% beat Leidos Holdings's return on equity of 29.95%.

Gartner has a consensus price target of $485.32, signalling upside risk potential of 11.21%. On the other hand Leidos Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $173.49 which suggests that it could grow by 16.81%. Given that Leidos Holdings has higher upside potential than Gartner, analysts believe Leidos Holdings is more attractive than Gartner.

Gartner has a beta of 1.231, which suggesting that the stock is 23.082% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Leidos Holdings has a beta of 0.631, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 36.932%.

Gartner has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Leidos Holdings offers a yield of 1.05% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share. Gartner pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Leidos Holdings pays out 16.59% of its earnings as a dividend. Leidos Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Gartner quarterly revenues are $1.5B, which are smaller than Leidos Holdings quarterly revenues of $4.2B. Gartner's net income of $210.9M is lower than Leidos Holdings's net income of $363M. Notably, Gartner's price-to-earnings ratio is 27.16x while Leidos Holdings's PE ratio is 14.94x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Gartner is 5.38x versus 1.18x for Leidos Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.