LDOS Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Aurora Innovation has a net margin of 8.69% compared to Leidos Holdings's net margin of --. Leidos Holdings's return on equity of 27.31% beat Aurora Innovation's return on equity of --.

Leidos Holdings has a consensus price target of $192.17, signalling upside risk potential of 32%. On the other hand Aurora Innovation has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by -24.57%. Given that Leidos Holdings has higher upside potential than Aurora Innovation, analysts believe Leidos Holdings is more attractive than Aurora Innovation.

Leidos Holdings has a beta of 0.637, which suggesting that the stock is 36.266% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Aurora Innovation has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Leidos Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.06%. Aurora Innovation offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Leidos Holdings pays 101.01% of its earnings as a dividend. Aurora Innovation pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Leidos Holdings quarterly revenues are $4.2B, which are larger than Aurora Innovation quarterly revenues of --. Leidos Holdings's net income of $364M is higher than Aurora Innovation's net income of -$208M. Notably, Leidos Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 16.58x while Aurora Innovation's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Leidos Holdings is 1.23x versus 163.51x for Aurora Innovation. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Cantaloupe has a net margin of 8.69% compared to Leidos Holdings's net margin of 5.04%. Leidos Holdings's return on equity of 27.31% beat Cantaloupe's return on equity of 7.51%.

Leidos Holdings has a consensus price target of $192.17, signalling upside risk potential of 32%. On the other hand Cantaloupe has an analysts' consensus of $11.50 which suggests that it could grow by 18.19%. Given that Leidos Holdings has higher upside potential than Cantaloupe, analysts believe Leidos Holdings is more attractive than Cantaloupe.

Leidos Holdings has a beta of 0.637, which suggesting that the stock is 36.266% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Cantaloupe has a beta of 1.659, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 65.884%.

Leidos Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.06%. Cantaloupe offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Leidos Holdings pays 101.01% of its earnings as a dividend. Cantaloupe pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Leidos Holdings quarterly revenues are $4.2B, which are larger than Cantaloupe quarterly revenues of $70.8M. Leidos Holdings's net income of $364M is higher than Cantaloupe's net income of $3.6M. Notably, Leidos Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 16.58x while Cantaloupe's PE ratio is 57.24x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Leidos Holdings is 1.23x versus 2.61x for Cantaloupe. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Parsons has a net margin of 8.69% compared to Leidos Holdings's net margin of 3.98%. Leidos Holdings's return on equity of 27.31% beat Parsons's return on equity of 3.39%.

Leidos Holdings has a consensus price target of $192.17, signalling upside risk potential of 32%. On the other hand Parsons has an analysts' consensus of $121.71 which suggests that it could grow by 30.27%. Given that Leidos Holdings has higher upside potential than Parsons, analysts believe Leidos Holdings is more attractive than Parsons.

Leidos Holdings has a beta of 0.637, which suggesting that the stock is 36.266% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Parsons has a beta of 0.736, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 26.399%.

Leidos Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.06%. Parsons offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Leidos Holdings pays 101.01% of its earnings as a dividend. Parsons pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Leidos Holdings quarterly revenues are $4.2B, which are larger than Parsons quarterly revenues of $1.8B. Leidos Holdings's net income of $364M is higher than Parsons's net income of $72M. Notably, Leidos Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 16.58x while Parsons's PE ratio is 141.56x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Leidos Holdings is 1.23x versus 1.59x for Parsons. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Science Applications International has a net margin of 8.69% compared to Leidos Holdings's net margin of 5.36%. Leidos Holdings's return on equity of 27.31% beat Science Applications International's return on equity of 17.6%.

Leidos Holdings has a consensus price target of $192.17, signalling upside risk potential of 32%. On the other hand Science Applications International has an analysts' consensus of $137.11 which suggests that it could grow by 23.24%. Given that Leidos Holdings has higher upside potential than Science Applications International, analysts believe Leidos Holdings is more attractive than Science Applications International.

Leidos Holdings has a beta of 0.637, which suggesting that the stock is 36.266% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Science Applications International has a beta of 0.646, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 35.41%.

Leidos Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.06%. Science Applications International offers a yield of 1.33% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.37 per share. Leidos Holdings pays 101.01% of its earnings as a dividend. Science Applications International pays out 16.56% of its earnings as a dividend. Science Applications International's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Leidos Holdings's is not.

Leidos Holdings quarterly revenues are $4.2B, which are larger than Science Applications International quarterly revenues of $2B. Leidos Holdings's net income of $364M is higher than Science Applications International's net income of $106M. Notably, Leidos Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 16.58x while Science Applications International's PE ratio is 18.76x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Leidos Holdings is 1.23x versus 0.78x for Science Applications International. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.