IDT Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Cogent Communications Holdings has a net margin of 7.18% compared to IDT's net margin of -21.07%. IDT's return on equity of 34.57% beat Cogent Communications Holdings's return on equity of -59.43%.

IDT has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 18.81%. On the other hand Cogent Communications Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $70.82 which suggests that it could grow by 44.65%. Given that Cogent Communications Holdings has higher upside potential than IDT, analysts believe Cogent Communications Holdings is more attractive than IDT.

IDT has a beta of 0.717, which suggesting that the stock is 28.295% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Cogent Communications Holdings has a beta of 0.723, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 27.723%.

IDT has a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.34%. Cogent Communications Holdings offers a yield of 8.16% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.01 per share. IDT pays 3.94% of its earnings as a dividend. Cogent Communications Holdings pays out -92.81% of its earnings as a dividend. IDT's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

IDT quarterly revenues are $302M, which are larger than Cogent Communications Holdings quarterly revenues of $247M. IDT's net income of $21.7M is higher than Cogent Communications Holdings's net income of -$52M. Notably, IDT's price-to-earnings ratio is 17.15x while Cogent Communications Holdings's PE ratio is 92.90x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for IDT is 1.35x versus 2.30x for Cogent Communications Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

iQSTEL has a net margin of 7.18% compared to IDT's net margin of -1.7%. IDT's return on equity of 34.57% beat iQSTEL's return on equity of -48.27%.

IDT has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 18.81%. On the other hand iQSTEL has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that IDT has higher upside potential than iQSTEL, analysts believe IDT is more attractive than iQSTEL.

IDT has a beta of 0.717, which suggesting that the stock is 28.295% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison iQSTEL has a beta of 1.708, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 70.75%.

IDT has a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.34%. iQSTEL offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. IDT pays 3.94% of its earnings as a dividend. iQSTEL pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. IDT's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

IDT quarterly revenues are $302M, which are larger than iQSTEL quarterly revenues of $54.2M. IDT's net income of $21.7M is higher than iQSTEL's net income of -$923.8K. Notably, IDT's price-to-earnings ratio is 17.15x while iQSTEL's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for IDT is 1.35x versus 4.76x for iQSTEL. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

KVH Industries has a net margin of 7.18% compared to IDT's net margin of -6.73%. IDT's return on equity of 34.57% beat KVH Industries's return on equity of -6.78%.

IDT has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 18.81%. On the other hand KVH Industries has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 33.59%. Given that KVH Industries has higher upside potential than IDT, analysts believe KVH Industries is more attractive than IDT.

IDT has a beta of 0.717, which suggesting that the stock is 28.295% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison KVH Industries has a beta of 0.802, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 19.777%.

IDT has a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.34%. KVH Industries offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. IDT pays 3.94% of its earnings as a dividend. KVH Industries pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. IDT's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

IDT quarterly revenues are $302M, which are larger than KVH Industries quarterly revenues of $25.4M. IDT's net income of $21.7M is higher than KVH Industries's net income of -$1.7M. Notably, IDT's price-to-earnings ratio is 17.15x while KVH Industries's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for IDT is 1.35x versus 0.93x for KVH Industries. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Lumen Technologies has a net margin of 7.18% compared to IDT's net margin of -6.32%. IDT's return on equity of 34.57% beat Lumen Technologies's return on equity of -75.79%.

IDT has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 18.81%. On the other hand Lumen Technologies has an analysts' consensus of $4.97 which suggests that it could grow by 18.29%. Given that IDT has higher upside potential than Lumen Technologies, analysts believe IDT is more attractive than Lumen Technologies.

IDT has a beta of 0.717, which suggesting that the stock is 28.295% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lumen Technologies has a beta of 1.378, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 37.781%.

IDT has a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.34%. Lumen Technologies offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. IDT pays 3.94% of its earnings as a dividend. Lumen Technologies pays out -5.46% of its earnings as a dividend. IDT's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

IDT quarterly revenues are $302M, which are smaller than Lumen Technologies quarterly revenues of $3.2B. IDT's net income of $21.7M is higher than Lumen Technologies's net income of -$201M. Notably, IDT's price-to-earnings ratio is 17.15x while Lumen Technologies's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for IDT is 1.35x versus 0.32x for Lumen Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.