ATEX Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

IDT has a net margin of -823.08% compared to Anterix's net margin of 6.68%. Anterix's return on equity of -19.58% beat IDT's return on equity of 30.53%.

Anterix has a consensus price target of $80.67, signalling upside risk potential of 197.66%. On the other hand IDT has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 26.64%. Given that Anterix has higher upside potential than IDT, analysts believe Anterix is more attractive than IDT.

Anterix has a beta of 0.940, which suggesting that the stock is 6.033% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison IDT has a beta of 0.689, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 31.103%.

Anterix has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. IDT offers a yield of 0.35% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share. Anterix pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. IDT pays out 3.94% of its earnings as a dividend. IDT's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Anterix quarterly revenues are $1.6M, which are smaller than IDT quarterly revenues of $303.3M. Anterix's net income of $7.7M is lower than IDT's net income of $20.3M. Notably, Anterix's price-to-earnings ratio is 39.67x while IDT's PE ratio is 19.35x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Anterix is 85.34x versus 1.27x for IDT. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

iQSTEL has a net margin of -823.08% compared to Anterix's net margin of -1.7%. Anterix's return on equity of -19.58% beat iQSTEL's return on equity of -48.27%.

Anterix has a consensus price target of $80.67, signalling upside risk potential of 197.66%. On the other hand iQSTEL has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Anterix has higher upside potential than iQSTEL, analysts believe Anterix is more attractive than iQSTEL.

Anterix has a beta of 0.940, which suggesting that the stock is 6.033% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison iQSTEL has a beta of 1.708, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 70.75%.

Anterix has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. iQSTEL offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Anterix pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. iQSTEL pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Anterix quarterly revenues are $1.6M, which are smaller than iQSTEL quarterly revenues of $54.2M. Anterix's net income of $7.7M is higher than iQSTEL's net income of -$923.8K. Notably, Anterix's price-to-earnings ratio is 39.67x while iQSTEL's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Anterix is 85.34x versus 4.76x for iQSTEL. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

KVH Industries has a net margin of -823.08% compared to Anterix's net margin of -6.73%. Anterix's return on equity of -19.58% beat KVH Industries's return on equity of -6.78%.

Anterix has a consensus price target of $80.67, signalling upside risk potential of 197.66%. On the other hand KVH Industries has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 31.33%. Given that Anterix has higher upside potential than KVH Industries, analysts believe Anterix is more attractive than KVH Industries.

Anterix has a beta of 0.940, which suggesting that the stock is 6.033% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison KVH Industries has a beta of 0.784, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 21.559%.

Anterix has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. KVH Industries offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Anterix pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. KVH Industries pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Anterix quarterly revenues are $1.6M, which are smaller than KVH Industries quarterly revenues of $25.4M. Anterix's net income of $7.7M is higher than KVH Industries's net income of -$1.7M. Notably, Anterix's price-to-earnings ratio is 39.67x while KVH Industries's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Anterix is 85.34x versus 0.94x for KVH Industries. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Lumen Technologies has a net margin of -823.08% compared to Anterix's net margin of -6.32%. Anterix's return on equity of -19.58% beat Lumen Technologies's return on equity of -75.79%.

Anterix has a consensus price target of $80.67, signalling upside risk potential of 197.66%. On the other hand Lumen Technologies has an analysts' consensus of $4.88 which suggests that it could grow by 31.11%. Given that Anterix has higher upside potential than Lumen Technologies, analysts believe Anterix is more attractive than Lumen Technologies.

Anterix has a beta of 0.940, which suggesting that the stock is 6.033% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lumen Technologies has a beta of 1.338, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 33.833%.

Anterix has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Lumen Technologies offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Anterix pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Lumen Technologies pays out -5.46% of its earnings as a dividend.

Anterix quarterly revenues are $1.6M, which are smaller than Lumen Technologies quarterly revenues of $3.2B. Anterix's net income of $7.7M is higher than Lumen Technologies's net income of -$201M. Notably, Anterix's price-to-earnings ratio is 39.67x while Lumen Technologies's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Anterix is 85.34x versus 0.28x for Lumen Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.