CCOI Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

IDT has a net margin of -21.07% compared to Cogent Communications Holdings's net margin of 7.18%. Cogent Communications Holdings's return on equity of -59.43% beat IDT's return on equity of 34.57%.

Cogent Communications Holdings has a consensus price target of $70.82, signalling upside risk potential of 44.65%. On the other hand IDT has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 18.81%. Given that Cogent Communications Holdings has higher upside potential than IDT, analysts believe Cogent Communications Holdings is more attractive than IDT.

Cogent Communications Holdings has a beta of 0.723, which suggesting that the stock is 27.723% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison IDT has a beta of 0.717, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 28.295%.

Cogent Communications Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $1.01 per share corresponding to a yield of 8.16%. IDT offers a yield of 0.34% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share. Cogent Communications Holdings pays -92.81% of its earnings as a dividend. IDT pays out 3.94% of its earnings as a dividend. IDT's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Cogent Communications Holdings quarterly revenues are $247M, which are smaller than IDT quarterly revenues of $302M. Cogent Communications Holdings's net income of -$52M is lower than IDT's net income of $21.7M. Notably, Cogent Communications Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 92.90x while IDT's PE ratio is 17.15x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cogent Communications Holdings is 2.30x versus 1.35x for IDT. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

iQSTEL has a net margin of -21.07% compared to Cogent Communications Holdings's net margin of -1.7%. Cogent Communications Holdings's return on equity of -59.43% beat iQSTEL's return on equity of -48.27%.

Cogent Communications Holdings has a consensus price target of $70.82, signalling upside risk potential of 44.65%. On the other hand iQSTEL has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Cogent Communications Holdings has higher upside potential than iQSTEL, analysts believe Cogent Communications Holdings is more attractive than iQSTEL.

Cogent Communications Holdings has a beta of 0.723, which suggesting that the stock is 27.723% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison iQSTEL has a beta of 1.708, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 70.75%.

Cogent Communications Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $1.01 per share corresponding to a yield of 8.16%. iQSTEL offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Cogent Communications Holdings pays -92.81% of its earnings as a dividend. iQSTEL pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Cogent Communications Holdings quarterly revenues are $247M, which are larger than iQSTEL quarterly revenues of $54.2M. Cogent Communications Holdings's net income of -$52M is lower than iQSTEL's net income of -$923.8K. Notably, Cogent Communications Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 92.90x while iQSTEL's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cogent Communications Holdings is 2.30x versus 4.76x for iQSTEL. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

KVH Industries has a net margin of -21.07% compared to Cogent Communications Holdings's net margin of -6.73%. Cogent Communications Holdings's return on equity of -59.43% beat KVH Industries's return on equity of -6.78%.

Cogent Communications Holdings has a consensus price target of $70.82, signalling upside risk potential of 44.65%. On the other hand KVH Industries has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 33.59%. Given that Cogent Communications Holdings has higher upside potential than KVH Industries, analysts believe Cogent Communications Holdings is more attractive than KVH Industries.

Cogent Communications Holdings has a beta of 0.723, which suggesting that the stock is 27.723% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison KVH Industries has a beta of 0.802, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 19.777%.

Cogent Communications Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $1.01 per share corresponding to a yield of 8.16%. KVH Industries offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Cogent Communications Holdings pays -92.81% of its earnings as a dividend. KVH Industries pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Cogent Communications Holdings quarterly revenues are $247M, which are larger than KVH Industries quarterly revenues of $25.4M. Cogent Communications Holdings's net income of -$52M is lower than KVH Industries's net income of -$1.7M. Notably, Cogent Communications Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 92.90x while KVH Industries's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cogent Communications Holdings is 2.30x versus 0.93x for KVH Industries. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Lumen Technologies has a net margin of -21.07% compared to Cogent Communications Holdings's net margin of -6.32%. Cogent Communications Holdings's return on equity of -59.43% beat Lumen Technologies's return on equity of -75.79%.

Cogent Communications Holdings has a consensus price target of $70.82, signalling upside risk potential of 44.65%. On the other hand Lumen Technologies has an analysts' consensus of $4.97 which suggests that it could grow by 18.29%. Given that Cogent Communications Holdings has higher upside potential than Lumen Technologies, analysts believe Cogent Communications Holdings is more attractive than Lumen Technologies.

Cogent Communications Holdings has a beta of 0.723, which suggesting that the stock is 27.723% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lumen Technologies has a beta of 1.378, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 37.781%.

Cogent Communications Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $1.01 per share corresponding to a yield of 8.16%. Lumen Technologies offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Cogent Communications Holdings pays -92.81% of its earnings as a dividend. Lumen Technologies pays out -5.46% of its earnings as a dividend.

Cogent Communications Holdings quarterly revenues are $247M, which are smaller than Lumen Technologies quarterly revenues of $3.2B. Cogent Communications Holdings's net income of -$52M is higher than Lumen Technologies's net income of -$201M. Notably, Cogent Communications Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 92.90x while Lumen Technologies's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cogent Communications Holdings is 2.30x versus 0.32x for Lumen Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.