GHC Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Ambow Education Holding has a net margin of 2.05% compared to Graham Holdings's net margin of --. Graham Holdings's return on equity of 14.93% beat Ambow Education Holding's return on equity of --.

Graham Holdings has a consensus price target of $785.00, signalling downside risk potential of -18.76%. On the other hand Ambow Education Holding has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Graham Holdings has higher upside potential than Ambow Education Holding, analysts believe Graham Holdings is more attractive than Ambow Education Holding.

Graham Holdings has a beta of 0.935, which suggesting that the stock is 6.546% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Ambow Education Holding has a beta of 0.675, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 32.529%.

Graham Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $1.80 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.73%. Ambow Education Holding offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Graham Holdings pays 4.19% of its earnings as a dividend. Ambow Education Holding pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Graham Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Graham Holdings quarterly revenues are $1.2B, which are larger than Ambow Education Holding quarterly revenues of --. Graham Holdings's net income of $23.9M is higher than Ambow Education Holding's net income of --. Notably, Graham Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 6.77x while Ambow Education Holding's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Graham Holdings is 0.88x versus 0.49x for Ambow Education Holding. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Lincoln Educational Services has a net margin of 2.05% compared to Graham Holdings's net margin of 1.65%. Graham Holdings's return on equity of 14.93% beat Lincoln Educational Services's return on equity of 7.04%.

Graham Holdings has a consensus price target of $785.00, signalling downside risk potential of -18.76%. On the other hand Lincoln Educational Services has an analysts' consensus of $25.80 which suggests that it could grow by 12.17%. Given that Lincoln Educational Services has higher upside potential than Graham Holdings, analysts believe Lincoln Educational Services is more attractive than Graham Holdings.

Graham Holdings has a beta of 0.935, which suggesting that the stock is 6.546% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lincoln Educational Services has a beta of 1.619, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 61.917%.

Graham Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $1.80 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.73%. Lincoln Educational Services offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Graham Holdings pays 4.19% of its earnings as a dividend. Lincoln Educational Services pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Graham Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Graham Holdings quarterly revenues are $1.2B, which are larger than Lincoln Educational Services quarterly revenues of $117.5M. Graham Holdings's net income of $23.9M is higher than Lincoln Educational Services's net income of $1.9M. Notably, Graham Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 6.77x while Lincoln Educational Services's PE ratio is 58.97x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Graham Holdings is 0.88x versus 1.57x for Lincoln Educational Services. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Mynd.ai has a net margin of 2.05% compared to Graham Holdings's net margin of --. Graham Holdings's return on equity of 14.93% beat Mynd.ai's return on equity of -126.08%.

Graham Holdings has a consensus price target of $785.00, signalling downside risk potential of -18.76%. On the other hand Mynd.ai has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Graham Holdings has higher upside potential than Mynd.ai, analysts believe Graham Holdings is more attractive than Mynd.ai.

Graham Holdings has a beta of 0.935, which suggesting that the stock is 6.546% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Mynd.ai has a beta of 1.529, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 52.915%.

Graham Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $1.80 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.73%. Mynd.ai offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $5.63 per share. Graham Holdings pays 4.19% of its earnings as a dividend. Mynd.ai pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Graham Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Graham Holdings quarterly revenues are $1.2B, which are larger than Mynd.ai quarterly revenues of --. Graham Holdings's net income of $23.9M is higher than Mynd.ai's net income of --. Notably, Graham Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 6.77x while Mynd.ai's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Graham Holdings is 0.88x versus 0.16x for Mynd.ai. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Perdoceo Education has a net margin of 2.05% compared to Graham Holdings's net margin of 20.51%. Graham Holdings's return on equity of 14.93% beat Perdoceo Education's return on equity of 16.39%.

Graham Holdings has a consensus price target of $785.00, signalling downside risk potential of -18.76%. On the other hand Perdoceo Education has an analysts' consensus of $40.00 which suggests that it could grow by 23.46%. Given that Perdoceo Education has higher upside potential than Graham Holdings, analysts believe Perdoceo Education is more attractive than Graham Holdings.

Graham Holdings has a beta of 0.935, which suggesting that the stock is 6.546% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Perdoceo Education has a beta of 0.850, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 15.017%.

Graham Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $1.80 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.73%. Perdoceo Education offers a yield of 1.61% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share. Graham Holdings pays 4.19% of its earnings as a dividend. Perdoceo Education pays out 21.48% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Graham Holdings quarterly revenues are $1.2B, which are larger than Perdoceo Education quarterly revenues of $213M. Graham Holdings's net income of $23.9M is lower than Perdoceo Education's net income of $43.7M. Notably, Graham Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 6.77x while Perdoceo Education's PE ratio is 14.34x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Graham Holdings is 0.88x versus 3.00x for Perdoceo Education. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.