AMBO Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Graham Holdings has a net margin of -- compared to Ambow Education Holding's net margin of 2.05%. Ambow Education Holding's return on equity of -- beat Graham Holdings's return on equity of 14.93%.

Ambow Education Holding has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Graham Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $785.00 which suggests that it could fall by -16.38%. Given that Graham Holdings has higher upside potential than Ambow Education Holding, analysts believe Graham Holdings is more attractive than Ambow Education Holding.

Ambow Education Holding has a beta of 0.675, which suggesting that the stock is 32.529% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Graham Holdings has a beta of 0.935, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 6.546%.

Ambow Education Holding has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Graham Holdings offers a yield of 0.75% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.80 per share. Ambow Education Holding pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Graham Holdings pays out 4.19% of its earnings as a dividend. Graham Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Ambow Education Holding quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Graham Holdings quarterly revenues of $1.2B. Ambow Education Holding's net income of -- is lower than Graham Holdings's net income of $23.9M. Notably, Ambow Education Holding's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Graham Holdings's PE ratio is 6.58x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ambow Education Holding is 0.54x versus 0.85x for Graham Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Lincoln Educational Services has a net margin of -- compared to Ambow Education Holding's net margin of 1.65%. Ambow Education Holding's return on equity of -- beat Lincoln Educational Services's return on equity of 7.04%.

Ambow Education Holding has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Lincoln Educational Services has an analysts' consensus of $25.80 which suggests that it could grow by 14.87%. Given that Lincoln Educational Services has higher upside potential than Ambow Education Holding, analysts believe Lincoln Educational Services is more attractive than Ambow Education Holding.

Ambow Education Holding has a beta of 0.675, which suggesting that the stock is 32.529% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lincoln Educational Services has a beta of 1.619, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 61.917%.

Ambow Education Holding has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Lincoln Educational Services offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Ambow Education Holding pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Lincoln Educational Services pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Ambow Education Holding quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Lincoln Educational Services quarterly revenues of $117.5M. Ambow Education Holding's net income of -- is lower than Lincoln Educational Services's net income of $1.9M. Notably, Ambow Education Holding's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Lincoln Educational Services's PE ratio is 57.59x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ambow Education Holding is 0.54x versus 1.53x for Lincoln Educational Services. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Mynd.ai has a net margin of -- compared to Ambow Education Holding's net margin of --. Ambow Education Holding's return on equity of -- beat Mynd.ai's return on equity of -126.08%.

Ambow Education Holding has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Mynd.ai has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Ambow Education Holding has higher upside potential than Mynd.ai, analysts believe Ambow Education Holding is more attractive than Mynd.ai.

Ambow Education Holding has a beta of 0.675, which suggesting that the stock is 32.529% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Mynd.ai has a beta of 1.529, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 52.915%.

Ambow Education Holding has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Mynd.ai offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $5.63 per share. Ambow Education Holding pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Mynd.ai pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Ambow Education Holding quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Mynd.ai quarterly revenues of --. Ambow Education Holding's net income of -- is lower than Mynd.ai's net income of --. Notably, Ambow Education Holding's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Mynd.ai's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ambow Education Holding is 0.54x versus 0.15x for Mynd.ai. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Perdoceo Education has a net margin of -- compared to Ambow Education Holding's net margin of 20.51%. Ambow Education Holding's return on equity of -- beat Perdoceo Education's return on equity of 16.39%.

Ambow Education Holding has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Perdoceo Education has an analysts' consensus of $40.00 which suggests that it could grow by 25.59%. Given that Perdoceo Education has higher upside potential than Ambow Education Holding, analysts believe Perdoceo Education is more attractive than Ambow Education Holding.

Ambow Education Holding has a beta of 0.675, which suggesting that the stock is 32.529% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Perdoceo Education has a beta of 0.850, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 15.017%.

Ambow Education Holding has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Perdoceo Education offers a yield of 1.63% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share. Ambow Education Holding pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Perdoceo Education pays out 21.48% of its earnings as a dividend. Perdoceo Education's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Ambow Education Holding quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Perdoceo Education quarterly revenues of $213M. Ambow Education Holding's net income of -- is lower than Perdoceo Education's net income of $43.7M. Notably, Ambow Education Holding's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Perdoceo Education's PE ratio is 14.09x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ambow Education Holding is 0.54x versus 2.95x for Perdoceo Education. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.