DINO Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Delek US Holdings has a net margin of -0.06% compared to HF Sinclair's net margin of -6.54%. HF Sinclair's return on equity of -1.46% beat Delek US Holdings's return on equity of -88.27%.

HF Sinclair has a consensus price target of $42.82, signalling upside risk potential of 14.76%. On the other hand Delek US Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $16.10 which suggests that it could fall by -17.92%. Given that HF Sinclair has higher upside potential than Delek US Holdings, analysts believe HF Sinclair is more attractive than Delek US Holdings.

HF Sinclair has a beta of 0.896, which suggesting that the stock is 10.383% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Delek US Holdings has a beta of 0.967, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 3.306%.

HF Sinclair has a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.36%. Delek US Holdings offers a yield of 5.2% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.26 per share. HF Sinclair pays 218.08% of its earnings as a dividend. Delek US Holdings pays out -11.46% of its earnings as a dividend.

HF Sinclair quarterly revenues are $6.4B, which are larger than Delek US Holdings quarterly revenues of $2.6B. HF Sinclair's net income of -$4M is higher than Delek US Holdings's net income of -$172.7M. Notably, HF Sinclair's price-to-earnings ratio is 39.04x while Delek US Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for HF Sinclair is 0.25x versus 0.11x for Delek US Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Marathon Petroleum has a net margin of -0.06% compared to HF Sinclair's net margin of -0.24%. HF Sinclair's return on equity of -1.46% beat Marathon Petroleum's return on equity of 9.28%.

HF Sinclair has a consensus price target of $42.82, signalling upside risk potential of 14.76%. On the other hand Marathon Petroleum has an analysts' consensus of $166.15 which suggests that it could grow by 2.16%. Given that HF Sinclair has higher upside potential than Marathon Petroleum, analysts believe HF Sinclair is more attractive than Marathon Petroleum.

HF Sinclair has a beta of 0.896, which suggesting that the stock is 10.383% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Marathon Petroleum has a beta of 0.893, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 10.743%.

HF Sinclair has a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.36%. Marathon Petroleum offers a yield of 2.19% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.91 per share. HF Sinclair pays 218.08% of its earnings as a dividend. Marathon Petroleum pays out 33.5% of its earnings as a dividend. Marathon Petroleum's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but HF Sinclair's is not.

HF Sinclair quarterly revenues are $6.4B, which are smaller than Marathon Petroleum quarterly revenues of $31.5B. HF Sinclair's net income of -$4M is higher than Marathon Petroleum's net income of -$74M. Notably, HF Sinclair's price-to-earnings ratio is 39.04x while Marathon Petroleum's PE ratio is 22.87x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for HF Sinclair is 0.25x versus 0.39x for Marathon Petroleum. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Phillips 66 has a net margin of -0.06% compared to HF Sinclair's net margin of 1.6%. HF Sinclair's return on equity of -1.46% beat Phillips 66's return on equity of 6.28%.

HF Sinclair has a consensus price target of $42.82, signalling upside risk potential of 14.76%. On the other hand Phillips 66 has an analysts' consensus of $131.12 which suggests that it could grow by 10.46%. Given that HF Sinclair has higher upside potential than Phillips 66, analysts believe HF Sinclair is more attractive than Phillips 66.

HF Sinclair has a beta of 0.896, which suggesting that the stock is 10.383% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Phillips 66 has a beta of 1.017, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 1.711%.

HF Sinclair has a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.36%. Phillips 66 offers a yield of 3.92% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.20 per share. HF Sinclair pays 218.08% of its earnings as a dividend. Phillips 66 pays out 88.9% of its earnings as a dividend. Phillips 66's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but HF Sinclair's is not.

HF Sinclair quarterly revenues are $6.4B, which are smaller than Phillips 66 quarterly revenues of $30.4B. HF Sinclair's net income of -$4M is lower than Phillips 66's net income of $487M. Notably, HF Sinclair's price-to-earnings ratio is 39.04x while Phillips 66's PE ratio is 27.04x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for HF Sinclair is 0.25x versus 0.36x for Phillips 66. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Valero Energy has a net margin of -0.06% compared to HF Sinclair's net margin of -1.97%. HF Sinclair's return on equity of -1.46% beat Valero Energy's return on equity of 3.35%.

HF Sinclair has a consensus price target of $42.82, signalling upside risk potential of 14.76%. On the other hand Valero Energy has an analysts' consensus of $144.42 which suggests that it could grow by 9.47%. Given that HF Sinclair has higher upside potential than Valero Energy, analysts believe HF Sinclair is more attractive than Valero Energy.

HF Sinclair has a beta of 0.896, which suggesting that the stock is 10.383% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Valero Energy has a beta of 0.995, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 0.482%.

HF Sinclair has a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.36%. Valero Energy offers a yield of 3.34% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.13 per share. HF Sinclair pays 218.08% of its earnings as a dividend. Valero Energy pays out 49.96% of its earnings as a dividend. Valero Energy's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but HF Sinclair's is not.

HF Sinclair quarterly revenues are $6.4B, which are smaller than Valero Energy quarterly revenues of $30.3B. HF Sinclair's net income of -$4M is higher than Valero Energy's net income of -$595M. Notably, HF Sinclair's price-to-earnings ratio is 39.04x while Valero Energy's PE ratio is 46.62x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for HF Sinclair is 0.25x versus 0.33x for Valero Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.